Shel,
You could try the Palm Desktop for Windows.
http://www.palm.com/us/support/downloads/win_desktop.html
Note that you do *not* need a Palm or any other handheld device - you
can load it onto your desktop computer and simply run it as a calendar
from there. I use it all the time, although I
On 30/3/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
(well, actually anti-colesteralol* non-
hydrowossname spread), and a quick skim of the emails.
* q.v. Manuel in Fawlty Towers :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 30/3/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know for sure, but I believe PIM means something like Personal
Information Manager.
Pimms means strawberries and Wimbledon :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote on 30.03.06 0:17:
That was one of the very few lenses i was thinking of converting to
Canon EF fit... I went for the 65mm 5X macro instead...
Wow! That's a very interesting lens. Do you have any samples from that?
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On 29/3/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Since you got it free, maybe you can donate it to someone or to a group
that needs it. You can always get your tax deduction, so it's not that
you'd really get ~nothing~ for it.
This is a very good point. Quite a few years ago now I had
Aaron Reynolds wrote on 30.03.06 6:29:
Hey, congrats.
Thanks.
If it's anything like the A* 200mm f2.8, it'll be
spectacular. I wish the 2.8 had a tripod collar, actually!
Well, I can't say for A* 200/2.8 as I have never used one. AFAIR Rob used to
have both of them, so he could probably
On 30/3/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
That was one of the very few lenses i was thinking of converting to
Canon EF fit... I went for the 65mm 5X macro instead...
Wow! That's a very interesting lens. Do you have any samples from that?
Lemme see
At least to me it is major!
I've bee reading about all over for this great lens. After losing
out on one in an eBay auction a few months back by being too cheap to
bid a decent price for it, I was really wanting very badly to add
this one to my collection. Finally, I decided that I would
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It may also be a good idea
to fill the tube with led.
I think what we have here is a communication breakdown.
It's always the same.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Cotty wrote on 30.03.06 10:26:
Lemme see
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic20.html
and
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic24.html
and
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic22.html
and
I knew about the content, but I didn't know any noticed it was present
on Tekade which is (it seems) weel informed usually.
On 3/30/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille wrote on 30.03.06 9:42:
After my post on the flash trigger voltage problem I noticed something
else
On 3/30/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug, it will go up to 3200, but you have to dive into the menus. I
don't have mine in front of me, or I'd tell you which menu.
I do.
Menu Sensitivity Range Normal (ISO 200-1600 default) or Wide (ISO 200-3200)
Once you set it, you have it
Thibouille wrote on 30.03.06 11:12:
I knew about the content, but I didn't know any noticed it was present
on Tekade which is (it seems) weel informed usually.
Yeah, exactly! All these things are confirmed by my reliable source too. So
I think we can be sure of SR, fast AF (finally) and 10 MPix
Jay Taylor wrote on 30.03.06 10:31:
At least to me it is major!
I've bee reading about all over for this great lens. After losing
out on one in an eBay auction a few months back by being too cheap to
bid a decent price for it, I was really wanting very badly to add
this one to my
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/30 Thu AM 08:16:46 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Workflow
On 29/3/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Since you got it free, maybe you can donate it to someone or to a group
that needs it. You can
Op Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:12:30 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I knew about the content, but I didn't know any noticed it was present
on Tekade which is (it seems) weel informed usually.
Hmm, I have my doubts about that. They've missed the mark repeatedly while
claiming to have
On 3/30/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug, it will go up to 3200, but you have to dive into the menus. I
don't have mine in front of me, or I'd tell you which menu.
I do.
Menu Custom Function Sensitivity Range Normal (ISO 200-1600
default) or Wide (ISO 200-3200)
Once you set
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sad in a way, isn't it? But I always read his posts.
Paul
Yes, and I used to too...but he fell off his balcony and hit my plonk list
last night.
I'd rather not have done that, but it's for my mental health...
I let my pique rule the moment.
I'll be quiet about it all
Lucas Rijnders wrote on 30.03.06 11:32:
Hmm, I have my doubts about that. They've missed the mark repeatedly while
claiming to have official information. Best example is when they confirmed
the 9 Mp cypress sensor in the first Samsung D-SLR. They seem more
interested in generating or
Well, I'd have doubts too if these rumours from tekade weren't confirmed
by my friend from Polish Pentax dealer :-)
Very interesting, Sylwester ;)
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
On Mar 30, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Give me OmniWeb 2.0 on NeXTSTEP 3.3 anyday. You get GIF and JPEG
support, but lose all the extra crap.
Bah... use ASCII art :)
http://sam.zoy.org/libcaca/
- Dave (over RFC1149, of course)
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, keith_w wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sad in a way, isn't it? But I always read his posts.
Paul
Yes, and I used to too...but he fell off his balcony and hit my plonk list
last night.
But, Keith, look at the opportunities:
http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/POB/DEC0998/0519.html
I had a second look at the picture.
There is one thing that bothers me a bit. There is a circular grey spot
right next to the tale of the bug. It looks like you was a bit to hasty with
a Healing brush there. I'm not saying it is traces of Healing brush, I'm
only describing how it looks to me.
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And you don't know squat about me.
Only what you expose to the list, of course.
Not only do I love nature, but I've
spent more time hiking, climbing, exploring, and lost in the back woods
than I venture many people on this list have. In
Ken, nice picture. I would crop the bottom part and a bit of the top and
forget about 2/3 ratio. This would improve the focus on the subject
itself. Perhaps first a bit of rotating to get the body part straight.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The D is capable of 3200, but it has to be selected in the menu as
extended range. I have no significant dust problems with either of my
D. Perhaps that camera's mirror box had taken on a load at some time.
Paul
On Mar 29, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So I used Dave Brooks' *ist D
I believe Mike is right.
Talking about led: It could be a communication meltdown ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: mike
On 3/30/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't have an ISBN for the book. I don't do ISBN's - just search for it
by name on Google - it's published by Lenswork
If you have the book, you have the ISBN. :-)
Thanks, I will order it from
On 3/30/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments solicited
Good/Bad/Indifferent
What can you suggest/what would you have done differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Beautiful shot Ken.
Though I
I have been wondering about one thing.
In the 10 months I've had my DS, I have had dust on sensor one time. I'm not
very careful with my equipment. I do change lens almost everywhere. I don't
leave the camera house open, and I do try to be a little careful, but I have
a rather relaxed attitude
Dario Bonazza wrote:
keith_w wrote:
Escellent! I've seen this test area before, and it works well for such
a display.
I did appreciate the tests. Any chance you used a tripod for the more
sharp images?
All pictures, blurred and sharp, were taken on a tripod.
One question please,
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, keith_w wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sad in a way, isn't it? But I always read his posts.
Paul
Yes, and I used to too...but he fell off his balcony and hit my plonk
list last night.
But, Keith, look at the opportunities:
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
I have been wondering about one thing.
In the 10 months I've had my DS, I have had dust on sensor one time. I'm
not
very careful with my equipment. I do change lens almost
Joe wrote:
Incidentally, I have seen the complaints about older Toshibas
overheating. I believe newer models have a vent on the side.
Right. My wife's laptop has been in twice for the problem. It is a
series that on sale about 18-24 months ago. Fresh air is sucked in
from the bottom. Not good
On 30 Mar 2006 at 6:25, William Robb wrote:
Some people are looking for problems, and find them.
Others aren't, and don't.
I often only find I have dust problems after a session of macro shots :-(
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This has been my conclusion so far. But Aarons post may suggest some
different course.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From:
On 3/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipsome buttered toast
snip
Only in England, must one specifiy ~buttered~ toast...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 30 Mar 2006 at 10:19, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Well, I can't say for A* 200/2.8 as I have never used one. AFAIR Rob used to
have both of them, so he could probably tell something more about
differencies between both lenses even that he now uses FA* 200/2.8 :-) Rob?
All I can tell about A*
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:58:25 +0100, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipsome buttered toast
snip
Only in England, must one specifiy ~buttered~ toast...
Definitely. One does not wish to consume some poly-unsaturated chemical
mess. :-)
On 3/30/06, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last issue is that as good as the lens tripod mount is on the A* 200/4
macro it's pretty useless when the lens is used on the DSLRs because the RTF
housing hits the bracket knobs when the lens is rotated. So for portrait
orientation the
On 3/29/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would hesitate to say, however, that Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas,
Descartes, Kant, Spinoza, Leibnitz, Wittgenstein, Russell, Arendt,
Sartre, Camus (my personal fave) ought to have their work dismissed.
I may disagree with some of them, I
Godfrey wrote:
good old boy bumpkin philosophy and half-formed thoughts
I really haven't found any good old boy bumpkins on this list. Many
pretend to be such, but after many years here I recognize it as a
charade. This list has an outstanding group of minds, regardless of
degree credentials.
On 3/29/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments solicited
Good/Bad/Indifferent
What can you suggest/what would you have done differently?
Thanks in advance
EXQUISITE!!!
Sorry for yelling, but it's just
Yes, but I removed CSS from my webpages when AnnSan reported that she
could not view them with her old Netscape program. There are a lot of
things that make it easier for the programer but harder for the user. It
is a choice one has to make in the design stage (not that I do much
design stage
Bill, I certainly wasn't looking for problems -- more that I've been pleasantly
surprised not to have to retouch dust spots!
I asked someone who should know this kind of stuff on the tech side, and he
said something incomprehensible to me about changing something to do with the
sensor's charge
On 3/29/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you got it free, maybe you can donate it to someone or to a group
that needs it. You can always get your tax deduction, so it's not that
you'd really get ~nothing~ for it.
Hand up, waving it like a third grade schoolboy who knows the
Hi folks,
since i am travelling next week, i opened the April PUG today.
It can be viewed at http://pug.komkon.org
Have fun with all the interpretations of an april fools theme.
Best
Adelheid
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
Feel free mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Ken,
All that shiny stuff really put me off on the picture. It was like a
big blast of flash was corrupting the image. On a 4th viewing, I
think it is perhaps dew that is drying on the dragon fly's wings and
body. Now that is interesting! Still, I am troubled by all the
sparkle...
Regards,
On 3/30/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hand up, waving it like a third grade schoolboy who knows the answer,
but the teacher's ignoring him
Oo! Oo! Pick me! Pick me!
O! Oo! Over here! Pick me!
cheers,
frank
ps: only kidding
pps: not really
--
frank theriault wrote:
As I was commuting home last night, I realized that I forgot to
mention one of my favourite philosophers, David Hume.
David 'ume could outconsume Schoepenhauer and Hegel,
and Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.
--
Thanks,
DougF
On Mar 30, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
In the 10 months I've had my DS, I have had dust on sensor one time.
I'm not
very careful with my equipment. I do change lens almost everywhere. I
don't
leave the camera house open, and I do try to be a little careful, but
I have
a rather
Doug Franklin wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
As I was commuting home last night, I realized that I forgot to
mention one of my favourite philosophers, David Hume.
David 'ume could outconsume Schoepenhauer and Hegel,
and Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.
On 30/3/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
But macro is indeed hard work. Fortunately I can often count on my friend's
help - he is a very good and well known in Polish photo community macro
photographer. Here are some of his works:
On 30/3/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic20.html
and
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic24.html
and
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/nature/images/pic22.html
and
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
At the moment I only believe Mark Roberts :o)
What??? You've forgotten the three basic rules of the PDML:
1) Don't believe anything Frank says
2) Don't believe anything Cotty says
3) Don't believe anything Mark says
Quite honestly, I'm kind of hoping that the D Super (or
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a little more for the web. It clearly shows a
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about (plus some not-so-bad
ones):
http://aaronreynolds.ca/albums/PDML/dust.jpg
Is this out-of-the-ordinary for an
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about (plus some not-so-bad ones):
http://aaronreynolds.ca/albums/PDML/dust.jpg
Is this out-of-the-ordinary for an *ist D?
It's out of the ordinary for mine. I'm not particularly attentive to
dust, and often have to change
Op Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:38:08 +0200 schreef Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
At the moment I only believe Mark Roberts :o)
What??? You've forgotten the three basic rules of the PDML:
Noone ever told me ;o)
1) Don't believe anything Frank says
2) Don't believe
But I don't have the book, or, more precisely, the book is not here. It is
out on loan. In any case, I never look up books using the ISBN, only by
author/title.
BTW, the same book may have different ISBN's depending on which edition
or printing it may be. So, if you have an earlier edition,
I had two - maybe three - dust spots on my first istDS.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a little more for the web. It clearly shows a
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about
Dust? Me thinks hot pixels.
Toine
On 3/30/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a little more for the web. It clearly shows a
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about (plus some not-so-bad
Quoting Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some decent solution e.g. would it help to use a ballhead?
Have a look at this:
http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/cache/offonce/pid/3224?livid=103lsf=103child=5
I use this device for macro
On 30 Mar 2006 at 8:46, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a little more for the web. It clearly shows a
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about (plus some not-so-bad
ones):
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I bought a Vivitar series one 70-210 after reading your page (and others),
and I can't say you're wrong...
Ah well, seriously, that's one nice lens. I just printed a 8 x 12
print of a flower shot (this print is for the customer who may be
financing the 77 Limited!) taken
Hmm, those don't look like any dust spots I've seen ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
http://aaronreynolds.ca/albums/PDML/dust.jpg
Is this out-of-the-ordinary for an *ist D?
On 3/30/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a little more for the web. It clearly shows a
couple of the mean dusties I'm talking about (plus some not-so-bad
ones):
On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:08 AM, David Savage wrote:
I can't see any dust. Just a some hot pixels.
Is that what those are?
Why do they go away when blown with a blower brush?
-Aaron
On 30 Mar 2006 at 22:08, David Savage wrote:
I can't see any dust. Just a some hot pixels.
Maybe it's pixel dust :-)
Sorry.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since
On 30 Mar 2006 at 9:11, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:08 AM, David Savage wrote:
I can't see any dust. Just a some hot pixels.
Is that what those are?
Why do they go away when blown with a blower brush?
Their intensity is a function of exposure time and ISO. High ISO
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/30 Thu AM 11:12:14 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm
(not SP))
I believe Mike is right.
Talking about led: It could be a communication meltdown ;-)
Now
On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Their intensity is a function of exposure time and ISO. High ISO and
long
exposure times (under 1/4 with NR off) providing the combination most
likely to
shot them in all their glory.
Hrm. I'd say 90% of what I shot was ISO 1600, 1/500 -
On 3/30/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 30, 2006, at 9:08 AM, David Savage wrote:
I can't see any dust. Just a some hot pixels.
Is that what those are?
Why do they go away when blown with a blower brush?
-Aaron
Maybe it helps to cool the sensor?
:-)
I don't know
On 3/30/06, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Mar 2006 at 22:08, David Savage wrote:
I can't see any dust. Just a some hot pixels.
Maybe it's pixel dust :-)
Sorry.
No your not.
Dave :-)
--
All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy. -
Spike Milligan
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060330.html
Thanks for your helpful suggestions.
Dan
On 3/28/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan, the San Diego Zoo offers a Safari experience at an off site facility,
somewhat north of the city and conventional zoo. I had a great experience
there last year, They transport you on the back of
Yep. Hot pixels in the one shot, dust in the other.
-- Original message --
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Mar 2006 at 8:46, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Here's a chunk out of the middle of a file, unresized, unsharpened,
uncorrected, compressed a
Thank you Adelheid for another fine job of putting this together.
rg
AvK wrote:
Hi folks,
since i am travelling next week, i opened the April PUG today.
It can be viewed at http://pug.komkon.org
Have fun with all the interpretations of an april fools theme.
Best
Adelheid
--
Someone
I've gotten into the habit of holding the DS level or face-down to avoid
dust.
It's happened twice and the results aren't what I want from a
good camera.
Sometimes the dust, when working in a dusty environment, will
even migrate up to the focusing screen.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/30 Thu PM 01:18:20 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Workflow
On 3/29/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you got it free, maybe you can donate it to someone or to a group
that needs it. You can always
There's been some interesting dialog about preferences.
So I thought it might be good to put things into a more civil
format.
So here's the question: What aspect of producing an image do you
enjoy the most?
Composition? And what type?
Cotty wrote:
On 30/3/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
But macro is indeed hard work. Fortunately I can often count on my friend's
help - he is a very good and well known in Polish photo community macro
photographer. Here are some of his works:
On 3/30/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL
Thanks Frank I needed that :-)
Dave
Always happy to help.
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I've had a dust spec wandering around at the focusing screen for nearly six
months. I have cleaned it about ten times. The same spec turns up again,
after some time at another place. It has bugged me, but now I'm used to it.
Perhaps I will miss it when it's gone ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
After private emails with Fred, i'v pretty much talked myself into
trying an Epson printer.The R220 seems adaqate for BW prints with 3rd
party black ink(s). More so than my Canon which displays the green tint
Fred mentioned he had, and sems to have gone in the R220.
Just wondering if anyone
Poping in late on this one.
I don't see any dust Aaron, but i see 1 bad pixel, upper left.
Dust on my sensors shows up as dark grayish blobs. A good hurricane
blow seems to work best.
FWIW i seem to have more dust problems on the D than with the Nikons.
Dave
Here's a chunk out of the
Some time I am. But it's not intentional. I simply get carried away, but I
do understand it can be tiresome sometimes.
Sorry.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Adam Maas wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So I used Dave Brooks' *ist D last summer a bunch of times. Since
then, I've used a DS and now own a DS2. I noticed a couple of things
and thought I'd ask the list about them.
ISO -- I thought the maximum ISO on the D was 1600. Was it raised
with
Dave, that's from your D. The spots I'm asking about are on the player's chin,
on the jersey logo and on the Nikon sign. So they're not dust -- how does one
get these bad pixels in the first place, and how does one get rid of them?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks
My D you say.
I have never noticed them before,but then it might have something to do
with you shooting high iso and the background.Alot of my D shots have
open sky and grass, so i might have missed them.
Dust i just clone out. I'd say do the same for the stuck pixel.
I'll have to look
Compared to my PZ-1, PZ-1p, and (especially) Super
Programs, the istD shutter noise is a whisper. I have
shot chamber music recitals with the PZ-1p without
disturbing anyone, so comparing the istD and istDS
noise is rather like comparing the noise of a fly fart
and a flea sneeze.
Rick
--- Lucas
David J Brooks wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
Yes, I've been cloning these spots out of about 2000 pictures -- I meant is
there anything that can be done to the camera to get rid of them, or is it a
permanent problem? And how do they happen?
I don't have this problem with the DS2 as yet, and I don't want to. How do I
avoid it?
-Aaron
Well, I live in Anaheim (Hills). I highly recommend:
Gulliver's ...for great steaks, prime rib, English fare and a fantastic
atmosphere. The theme of the restaurant follows the the book by Jonathan
Swift. Call a few days ahead and ask for a table by the fire.
18482 Macarthur Blvd, Irvine, CA
On 30/3/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some people are looking for problems, and find them.
Others aren't, and don't.
Amen.
Only after I started contributing to Alamy did I start to see more dust
than I cared for. I hate looking too closely, but their regs mean I
scour each pic
Jay, I think you're going to enjoy this lens. I've had one since the late
90's - its one of my most used lenses.
I too would like it to have a tripod collar but I'm very satisfied with the
results as is.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David J Brooks wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
Hey, not in front of the ladies, eh.:-)
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
I see.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I was looking back at some of the replies(i'm a bit behind in pdml mail
lately) and i did find someone who mentioned the combo of high iso and
slow shutter speeds.That has been echoed a lot over the years you were
in exile.:-)
It may be a problem just with the D. I dont remember to many
That's theologically possible.
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David J Brooks wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it not seem curious that the article doesn't mention what damage Kodak
is allegedly doing to their customer's files? I read the article twice and
found nothing but generalities and a degree of vagueness unusual even for
the web.
Shel
National
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
