On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:16 AM, John Francis wrote:
My TiVo decided I might want to watch the 1966 Batman movie.
While I'm not convinced it was correct, I did happed to spot that
the featured camera in the first press conference bore the word
Pentax proudly on the pentaprism.
Terminator 2 was
I sent this earlier today, but from the wrong account.
My scavenger collection:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157626462969917/
This photo actually covers all of the terms:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5659923440/
It's made with cast metal, and the horses it adds to
Link:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/141875-new-lightroom-update-includes-trillion-pentax-lens-profiles.html
smc PENTAX-DA L 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED
smc PENTAX-DA L 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED
smc PENTAX-DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED
smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I much prefer biking to running for the aforementioned reasons. The current
thinking is to use minimal shoes, like the vibram 5-finger shoes because that
trains you to not pound so hard on your heels, and reduces injury to the rest
of your
I second that. I think most if not everybody will.
2011/4/27 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
On 4/27/2011 05:01, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
SMC Pentax f 1:1.4/50 1079293
Sigma zoom 1:3.5-4.5 f28-84mm Macro 1021659
Sigma zoom 75-210mm F3.5-4.5 Macro 1017656
Pentax ME Super (non-working)
That's because you're numb... :-)
Ciao,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
Sent from my iPad 2
On 27/04/2011, at 11:54, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
The discomfort goes away after 500-600 miles of riding.
stan
On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I just can't
I would appreciate it very much if we could avoid posts about the
royal wedding.
Dan
see what you started?
Besides, it wasn't a post about the royal wedding, which bores me as much as
it bores anyone, it was a post about an interesting photo essay, with a
little personal historical note.
My ancestors rejoiced in the smell of the Ruthenians' tents burning,
and the sound of their women wailing. Just saying. -T
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I would appreciate it very much if we could avoid posts about the
royal wedding.
Dan
see what you
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:25 +0100, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I would appreciate it very much if we could avoid posts about the
royal wedding.
Dan
see what you started?
Besides, it wasn't a post about the royal wedding, which bores me as much
as
it bores anyone, it was a
Finally! A Cormorant! :-)
https://picasaweb.google.com/petergly/Dropbox02?authkey=Gv1sRgCMejxoz119XGPg#5600171878626204882
Conversion to JPEG in PWP, slight sharpening, slight saturation increase.
Ciao,
Pete Mac in Melbourne
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:09 +1000, Peter McIntosh peter...@gmail.com
wrote:
Finally! A Cormorant! :-)
https://picasaweb.google.com/petergly/Dropbox02?authkey=Gv1sRgCMejxoz119XGPg#5600171878626204882
Yep - that's a shag all right.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:35 -0400, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Check out http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13017352
Taken on a recent spring afternoon
Comments - yeah or nay
Yeah.
Looks like alien creatures emerging from the depths (Take your loved
ones and run!)
The background
100% Yeah!
Do I spot a tortoise on the center stump?
Toine
On 26 April 2011 21:35, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Check out http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13017352
Taken on a recent spring afternoon
Comments - yeah or nay
Kenneth Waller
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:51 +0100, Timber tim...@clancode.hu wrote:
Hi List,
As some of you asked how to do Panoramas here's my little tutorial to
start with:
snip
Thanks for posting. It's always good to read how others approach a task.
I recently built a pano head which looks very similar
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:52 -0400, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see anyone else here. You must be talking to me.
You talking to me?
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/you-talkin-to-me.html
I have to admit, although I've never been a big fan of Canada
I have a little different problem related to the import place.
I may have screwed the whole thing so I'm not sure LR is the culprit.
I presently work with 2 catalogs. One for my personal work and one for
my photo courses.
It is easier (well I thought so at least) and I'm at no risk of
displaying
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Bob W,
Are we getting a little testy today?
You gotta chill out, it's only the internet!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I would appreciate it very much if we could avoid posts about the
royal wedding.
Dan
see what you started?
Besides,
Love the fuzzy one in shadow to the right.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Peter McIntosh peter...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally! A Cormorant! :-)
https://picasaweb.google.com/petergly/Dropbox02?authkey=Gv1sRgCMejxoz119XGPg#5600171878626204882
Conversion to JPEG in PWP, slight
Very good, I missed the turtle the first time! Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
100% Yeah!
Do I spot a tortoise on the center stump?
Toine
On 26 April 2011 21:35, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Check out
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You gotta chill out, it's only the internet!
4. The Internet
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR
smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll
On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Bob W wrote:
I would appreciate it very much if we could avoid posts about the
royal wedding.
Dan
Why don't we start up a database about the subjects that each PDMLer doesn't
want to appear on this list, along with
the subjects that might tangentially
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I presently work with 2 catalogs. One for my personal work and one for
my photo courses
Now, my problem: I realized I imported files from my Courses catalog
at the place I store my own files (lets call it Personal
http://cgi.ebay.com/Caltar-HR-210mm-f-5-6-lens-Copal-1-shutter-/260773330267?pt=Film_Camerashash=item3cb74d3d5b
At least in my opinion.
It's a Topcor and the little rear dent is generally meaningless.
If you shoot LF or want a lens with some movement for your DSLR,
this would be a really good
It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files.
Myself, I never owned the kit lenses at all and would never miss the
corrections.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that
minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe
You can remove a picture from the catalog without deleting it from the disk.
Delete the file (in LR), and when the prompt comes up, select Remove.
That will remove it from the catalog and keep it on disk.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, my problem: I
Or it could be that Pentax is lower on the priority list than Canon or
Nikon, and they got the profiles from Pentax later.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
How you omit the kit
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files.
No, profiles for the 18-55 lenses were not present in LR 3.3.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:26, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand.
Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that
minimal correction is needed. Second is that
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
I can't imagine our Pentaxes are that different, at a rough level of
granularity, inside:
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nikon-D5100-Teardown/5271/1
Awful slow way to load and unload film.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:12, Charles Robinson wrote:
BTW - is there any way to highlight a group of shots and turn on the lens
profile correction for all of them en masse?
(Answering my own question)
Select all images shot with the particular lens.
Develop one of them, select profile
On Apr 26, 2011, at 11:42, Boris Liberman wrote:
Galia certainly liked the multi-exposure feature of her camera...
Have a look here:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2011/04/peso-2011-13-in-motion.html
I keep forgetting that this function is there.
Neat shot! I have to remember to try
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
Toine
On 27 April 2011 08:48, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Link:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:52, frank theriault wrote:
I don't see anyone else here. You must be talking to me.
You talking to me?
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2011/04/you-talkin-to-me.html
I have to admit, although I've never been a big fan of Canada Geese,
I'm recently coming to
Final update:
I picked up the camera today. Issue fixed.
From the transport labeling I gather that the workshop is located in
Germany, not Belgium. However it doesn't say where.
Jostein
2011/4/21 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
Update: they missed the Easter deadline. :-(
Fingers crossed it
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens correction
on a fisheye.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and
the end result is very ugly...
It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens
Well done, everyone.
And Mark in particular, of course.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
While there are indeed correction profiles for this lens in LR... and LR finds
images taken with this lens and applies the corrections properly, LR reports
this lens (when, say, you filter by metadata) as unknown.
Obviously SOMETHING in LR knows that it's this particular lens.
Is anyone else
Construction-related, I think:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/04/27/-big/RUNE0422.jpg.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Sounds vaguely familiar to me. It was a while ago, but I think that shots with
the DA*50-135 are tagged as unknown in the metadata if imported into LR
before LR had an update that included that lens' information.
stan
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
While there are
I made a simple request. No one is bound to honor it. On the other
hand, I'm sure no one, especially not the Brits on this lists, want to
hear again my opinions on those who claim special status as royal or
noble personages in general, or my opinions on what the Norman and
German rulers of
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:04, Stan Halpin wrote:
Sounds vaguely familiar to me. It was a while ago, but I think that shots
with the DA*50-135 are tagged as unknown in the metadata if imported into
LR before LR had an update that included that lens' information.
Ah, I hadn't thought of that.
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:17, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 11:04, Stan Halpin wrote:
Sounds vaguely familiar to me. It was a while ago, but I think that shots
with the DA*50-135 are tagged as unknown in the metadata if imported into
LR before LR had an update that included
Apologies for the wrong day on this, but I must sell today in order to
have the funds to buy a stash of Pentax-A lenses locally this evening.
: )
Scarce SMC K 200mm f4: Doubt you will find a nicer one. Includes soft
case and original (correct) caps. $100 plus actual shipping
(worldwide). Email me
Yep. And correcting the CA manually gives beter results.
On 27 April 2011 17:42, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote:
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete
John Francis wrote:
Can we instead discuss why somebody who one might have thought would have been
a stickler for precise terminology chose to wrap the word royal in quotes?
Good point. I don't give a toss about the royal wedding, but the
misuse of quotation marks really bugs me.
--
Mark
Really bugs you?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Can we instead discuss why somebody who one might have thought would have been
a stickler for precise terminology chose to wrap the word royal in quotes?
Good point. I don't give a
Adds a whole new meaning to completely adjustable.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:14 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
I can't imagine our Pentaxes are that different, at a rough level of
granularity, inside:
On 11-04-27 10:14 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Tim Braytb...@textuality.com wrote:
I can't imagine our Pentaxes are that different, at a rough level of
granularity, inside:
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Nikon-D5100-Teardown/5271/1
Awful slow way to load and
The catalog's metadata needs to be updated.
- select All Photographs in the Library module, Catalog panel
- Set Grid view
- use the filter bar, Metadata switch, set the first column to Lens,
and click on Unknown
- Select all
- use the Metadata-Save metadata to file... command to write out
all
I got mine too. Lots of great photographs here :-)
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 27. apr. 2011 kl. 17.46 skrev AlunFoto:
Well done, everyone.
And Mark in particular, of course.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
One more...
First $59 to my paypal (cheekyg...@gmail.com) is the new owner. Free
First Class shipping to the Continental U.S. and Canada.
http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/m50f17-1.jpg
http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/m50f17-2.jpg
http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/m50f17-3.jpg
Looks like Time Warner Road-Runner has ended up on some kind of black list
again. I have not received anything from the list since Friday, April 22.
I have re-subscribed using one of my alternate email accounts.
I've had a note from Ann Sanfedele that she is also not receiving list emails
and
Thanks Dave and Christine!
No I haven´t tried to print them yet. It seems incredible now that the Magnolia
has flowers but I took them just a couple of weeks ago.
DagT
http://www.thrane.name
Den 25. apr. 2011 kl. 05.42 skrev Christine Aguila:
Intriguing! Have you ever printed these out,
On 4/27/11 1:48 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Looks like Time Warner Road-Runner has ended up on some kind of black list
again. I have not received anything from the list since Friday, April 22.
I have re-subscribed using one of my alternate email accounts.
I've had a note from Ann Sanfedele that
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2011/04/humleflue-bee-fly.html
Cheers,
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Hey, I'm the chillin'est dude in all Chillindom.
B
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bob Sullivan
Sent: 27 April 2011 12:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: From Horse Guards to Helmand
Bob W,
Are we getting a
It was not a misuse of quotation marks. It was a subtle reminder that
I refuse to accept pretensions that some people are better than others
because of royal or noble lineage.
Dan M
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Can we instead
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Can we instead discuss why somebody who one might have thought would
have been
a stickler for precise terminology chose to wrap the word royal in
quotes?
Good point. I don't give a toss about the royal
It was not a misuse of quotation marks. It was a subtle reminder that
I refuse to accept pretensions that some people are better than others
because of royal or noble lineage.
Dan M
they're not better than us because they're royal. They're royal because
they're better than us.
Or
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Peter McIntosh
Finally! A Cormorant! :-)
https://picasaweb.google.com/petergly/Dropbox02?authkey=Gv1sRgCMejxoz11
9XGPg#5600171878626204882
lovely plumage!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nice composition/positioning but the bug fades into the background.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - More macro
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2011/04/humleflue-bee-fly.html
Cheers,
Two possible places only, Hamburg and Braunschweig. Send me a pic of
the label if you want details.
2011/4/27 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
Final update:
I picked up the camera today. Issue fixed.
From the transport labeling I gather that the workshop is located in
Germany, not Belgium.
Strange bee never seen one.
The background has the wrong color (or the bee)
On 27 April 2011 20:16, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2011/04/humleflue-bee-fly.html
Cheers,
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:46, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The catalog's metadata needs to be updated.
- select All Photographs in the Library module, Catalog panel
- Set Grid view
- use the filter bar, Metadata switch, set the first column to Lens,
and click on Unknown
- Select all
- use the
AlunFoto wrote:
Final update:
I picked up the camera today. Issue fixed.
From the transport labeling I gather that the workshop is located in
Germany, not Belgium. However it doesn't say where.
If they told you they'd have to kill you.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
Charles:
I love the summary in step 14:
Approximately 4 billion screws hold the device together.
...and I can't imagine how the writer screwed that number up!
Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
On 11-04-27 2:57 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:46, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The catalog's metadata needs to be updated.
- select All Photographs in the Library module, Catalog panel
- Set Grid view
- use the filter bar, Metadata switch, set the first column to Lens,
and
There is no label from the repair shop in Germany. It has been
repacked in Oslo. However the description says the repair was
performed by a company called Tritec. Some guy at Pentaxforums is
pretty sure it's this place: http://www.tritec-service.de/ Which is
located in Vechelde, just west of
Subtle? I think not!
The Royals are a important part of the picture postcard trade, which
directly supports photographers, who in turn support the photographic
industry, including the Pentax portion of it.
It's a delicate ecosystem, so don't knock 'em.
-bmw
On 11-04-27 2:30 PM, Daniel J.
On 27/04/2011 10:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I made a simple request. No one is bound to honor it. On the other
hand, I'm sure no one, especially not the Brits on this lists, want to
hear again my opinions on those who claim special status as royal or
noble personages in general, or my
William, I don't want to get into that argument with you again, since
it provokes you to profanity.
You know how I feel about claims to royal status.
Besides my general objections to the very concept of nobility, I am
one of the few people on the planet who can actually be called a
Certified
On 27/04/2011 12:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
It was not a misuse of quotation marks. It was a subtle reminder that
I refuse to accept pretensions that some people are better than others
because of royal or noble lineage.
We get it Dan.
We get it every time the subject comes up.
Why not
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:29:57PM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
William, I don't want to get into that argument with you again, since
it provokes you to profanity.
You know how I feel about claims to royal status.
Tell you what, Dan - you stop posting your loony-tunes justification
for
The 50mm f1.7 is sold.
The SMC K 200mm f4
and Pentax-M 28mm f3.5
are still available.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
One more...
First $59 to my paypal (cheekyg...@gmail.com) is the new owner. Free
First Class shipping to the Continental U.S. and
I did not start it, William. I merely requested that we avoid posts
about THE wedding, and others responded with references to my Rusyn
heritage and things I had previously said. I have not said anything
today about the House of Windsor or its predessors, no about the
role of the British Empire
I have offered no political opinions in this thread, and I do not
intend to do so.
BTW, I will not object to posts and images about THE wedding, as long
as they are marked OT and the subject indicates that they are about
the wedding. Please feel free to share your joy among yourselves.
Dan
On
On 27/04/2011 1:29 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
You know how I feel about claims to royal status.
Yes, and expect to get sworn at by me every time you go off on another
of your tiresome tirades about it
Besides my general objections to the very concept of nobility, I am
one of the few
Fowa in Italy also offers a 48-hours repair service for the professionals
using the 645D (lending a backup camera in case of longer repairs).
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Since I'm driving to Chicago on Friday ...
#1 I still have the A70-210/4 that is physically (externally) rough
but optically and mechanically just fine. $35.
#2 Sunpak 611 #1. GN160 -- that means 10 feet @ f16.
With sensor adapter (The 611 had no camera control feature. Bummer.)
With Westcott
On Apr 27, 2011, at 14:14, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-04-27 2:57 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:46, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The catalog's metadata needs to be updated.
- select All Photographs in the Library module, Catalog panel
- Set Grid view
- use the filter bar,
Thanks very much Ann; I am spoiled.
Thanks also for the encouragment; my kettle photo which was uploaded
only a week ago has also been accepted!
I was not expecting such a fast/positive decision.
You are not one of the judges, are you?
:)
Bulent
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel J. Matyola
I did not start it, William. I merely requested that we avoid posts
about THE wedding, and others responded with references to my Rusyn
heritage and things I had previously said. I have not said
I think it's all the Canadians fault.
If they would have held the colonies together,
they could have sent an army down to crush the American rebels.
But nooo...
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/04/2011 10:06 AM, Daniel J.
On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So I posted this to the list at the time you see NOW I'm not even seeing
what I posted in the PDML archives...
(is that because the archives are not updated continually?)
anyway - if you didnt see it come up here it is
and if you did
I have no problem with just about anything being posted here, as long
as it is marked OT and labeled so we can tell what it is about, and
whether we want to read the thread. I don't want to read, for
example, about Donald Trump and his claims about President Obama's
birth certificate. I can't
On 2011-04-27 13:29 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I was given my Peasant's
Certificate on the stage of the Shubert Theater, on Easter Sunday,
2005 (also know as my Broadway review). The Certificate was presented
to me by David Hyde Pierce, Hank Azaria, Tim Curry, Sara (Dr Torres)
Ramirez, and the
From: Doug Brewer
On 4/27/11 1:48 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Looks like Time Warner Road-Runner has ended up on some kind of black
list again.
I have not received anything from the list since Friday, April 22.
I have re-subscribed using one of my alternate email accounts.
I've had a note from
Yes I can confirm that. Tritec is one of two places Pentax uses these days.
Cheers
Ecke
2011/4/27 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
There is no label from the repair shop in Germany. It has been
repacked in Oslo. However the description says the repair was
performed by a company called Tritec. Some
2011/4/27 Toine to...@repiuk.nl:
Strange bee never seen one.
The background has the wrong color (or the bee)
must be a white beelance problem then...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
This is just a test. I've had difficulty posting to the list every time I
have tried.
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel J. Matyola
I have no problem with just about anything being posted here, as long
as it is marked OT and labeled so we can tell what it is about, and
whether we want to read the thread. I don't want to read, for
On 2011-04-27 18:01, John Sessoms wrote:
Do I understand correctly that PDML has been added to a black-list that
Road-Runner subscribes to? And that Road-Runner is blocking the list because
it's coming from an IP address that's on that black-list?
One way is for it to have been an IP
This is just a test. I've had difficulty posting to the list every time I have
tried.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I haven't used the Update DNG ... command in quite a while. The
original implementation seemed a little buggy but that was way back in
v1.x.
My concern is that I have a lot of time invested in metadata
annotations: I want to be sure that when I re-read the metadata,
what's in the catalog is
I see your test message! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Keith Mosier jarheadpho...@yahoo.com
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc: w-keith2.mos...@usa.dupont.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:20 PM
Subject: test message
This is just a test. I've had difficulty posting to the list
Love the happy knarf, ann!!! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com; Pentax-Discuss Mail List
pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Geso: Scavenger hunt II]
On Apr 27, 2011,
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
