Adrian Vickers makes some magical things to make me read
} At 16:06 06/11/2002, you wrote:
}
}
} Hi all,
} I just installed a 33MHz 68040 (no EC) on my QXL-II and I have the other
} one (68EC040-25) as a spare. If anyone wants it, please let me know :-)
}
} What does EC stand for?
}
James Hunkins wrote:
Guys,
I finally got my web sight for QDT converted to my new web publishing
tool. It now has two new images and progress table updates.
hi color notebook page [updated]
QDT installer [new]
If anyone wants to take a look, it is at:
http://www.jdh-stech.com
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 02:01:09, Jeremy Taffel wrote:
(ref: 007e01c28601$8a88b6e0$afba0050taff3)
One thing that puzzles me; Dennis states that Wolfgang used the wrong
address so he never received it. However the wrong address seems to be the
one that Derek uses to contact this list.
I keep
I believe, with my very limited hardware knowlege, that EC stands for
Embedded Controller. It is a version of a chip designed to be put into some
gizmo or other, and just left to get on with it. Usually a cut down version
of the full blown chip.
HTH - and if I'm wrong, at least I'll get told :o)
Doesn't everyone ?
:o)
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar;LFS.co.uk
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
While walking on the fells, I came across a sheep with its horns entangled
in a wire fence. With great difficulty I managed to free it and, by way of
reward for saving it from a certain, lingering death, it tried to take my
fingers off.
More about mad sheep and fingers later. This note is
Rocky Mountain Oysters anyone ?
:o)
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar;LFS.co.uk
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original
Dave,
is ql chat still online ?
I got the following back when I sent a message to it just now :
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 11:55:07, Norman Dunbar wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony,
Our email system is Exchange, and when I got the email in from the list,
there was no attachemnet and the format is 'plain text' (I hate HTML and RTF
emails - just so someone can have their signiture embedded
Mike, I've moved over to ql-chat - just in case !
Hungry, me ? I'm afraid that I don't actually have to hunt to eat. I have a
perfectly good set of local farm shops, and farmer's markets which I
frequent when the need to feed the freezer arises.
As for digging a trench - you've abviously never
Wolfgang
I understand where you are coming from, and I am not taking
sides, but with tongue in cheek.
Don't you think this can get out of hand? See below
Regards
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.macnamaras.com
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This also requires them to contribute their
changes to other branches of SMSQ too, and to divulge their
intellectual property.
NO. Read the licence again.
quote:
When such a proposal is made, the person proposing it may state
whether its
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
is ql chat still online ?
I got the following back when I sent a message to it just now :
Thanks Norman. I moved the mail server to a new machine and that was the
first post using a mailing list since then.
I'll get it patched up and running within
??? 7/11/2002 10:57:22 ??, ?/? Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
is ql chat still online ?
I got the following back when I sent a message to it just now :
Thanks Norman. I moved the mail server to a new machine and that was the
first post using a
Funny that Norman, I was fiddling with a power supply on the
ADSL, then nothing would download although all Leds showed green,
IE was affected to. Reloaded drivers and all appears OK. perhaps
it is BT line problem.
Haggis
You affluent Anglos wallowing in luxury, while we poor stay at
home suffer
Before replying to Phoebus' post, I'd just like to say that I have the
utmost respect for someone who changes their mind after expressing a view
for so long.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, [windows-1253] Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
If someone has copies of the list in-or-around '98 he will remember that
I
No worries, glad it was something simple.
Cheers,
Norman.
PS. Of course, this means that various Haggis Hunting scenarios might just
appear on QL users instead :o)
But then again, maybe not !
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems
Tony Tebby wrote:
(rest of message clipped).
I just hope that this put some doubts to rest. And again I appeal to
DD - let's get on with it, correct the situation, it isn't too late yet.
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 07/11/02 at 17:07 Dave P wrote:
The issue I take with it is this notion that all versions of SMSQ/E must
be identical. I think this is not in SMSQ/E's best interest because it
discourages development.
For example, I think it is good for a version to add a feature that may
not be supported by
TonyTebby wrote:
[much]
Thanks a lot for clarifying the issue. I think this was really
necessary.
May common sense return to the land of the sheep,
Marcel
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
May common sense return to the land of the sheep,
Baa!
I don't want common sense. I want extraordinary sense!
Yes, TT surely clarified the situation. I read it in my mind's ear in a
God-like voice. I was waiting for him to go to Eindhoven and jump
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, ZN wrote:
Obviously, this excludes all platforms where such
feature simply makes on sense or is impossible (by design - leack of need),
but does at least suggest some form of forethought, so that we don't get
'my way or the highway' style features. This breeds
Dave P wrote:
I don't want common sense. I want extraordinary sense!
I'd already be satisfied with common sense after the mails within the
last few days. Makes me stop wanting to bang my head against the wall.
I was waiting for him to go to Eindhoven and jump up and down on
stage screaming
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] QL Calendar for 2003
Has anyone thought of doing of doing a QL Calendar ?
Jochen did one as a freebie in QL Today a couple of years ago, and I don't
think he will ever do one again. It's much more work
TonyTebby writes:
Well, I think this sorts the sheep from the goats ;)
Id like to take this opportunity to thank Tony Tebby, and also many others,
some of whom he has mentioned in his mail, for all you have done for
QL-users! Id like to assure you that your ingenuity, time and effort has
given
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
I was waiting for him to go to Eindhoven and jump up and down on
stage screaming Developers! Developers! Developers! :o)
Is this some obscure reference I don't get? A joke? Or just
extraordinary sense?
Some top guy at Microsoft did this on stage
Hello Everybody!
I am SO tired of that endless piracy discussion. The only highlight of the
last days was the nice story of that old lady which Tony told. But that is
just one drop of normality in an endless ocean of rubbish. This is my
advice to the involved parties:
get your duel pistons out,
Thanks for the help Marcel, but:
Pardon my ignorance, How does one enable sound and where??
Regards,
Peter
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcel Kilgus) wrote:
Peter Fox wrote:
The sound is rather like grinding gears and also happened when I had
problems with flp1_
Jochen did one as a freebie in QL Today a couple of years ago, and I don't
think he will ever do one again. It's much more work than you think and in
spite of clear instructions about size and format of adverts, many traders
did not stick to these.
Well, correct. It was totally free - free
Dave P wrote:
Some top guy at Microsoft did this on stage at a developers conference,
and came off sounding a bit loony!
Ah, the ape. I actually saw that one.
Nah. I'm more famous to more people than TT, and I really crave the
anonymity he has. Never be in the music business :/
Right. I
Michael Berger wrote:
I am SO tired of that endless piracy discussion.
So is (almost?) everyone involved. Any suggestion how the discussion
could have been prevented? No?
Like it or not, some issues just have to be solved.
get your duel pistons out, involve lawyers, do whatever you want - but
Peter Fox wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, How does one enable sound and where??
Using MenuConfig on SMSQE.BIN. I somehow doubt this helps much, but
it's at least worth a shot.
Marcel
Do you mean that the many copies I have of SMSQ, if I don't agree
to be bound a a new imposed license, are illegal. That can't be
right, I have bought an item, and must surely be able to continue
using it, while still being entitled to expect it is repaired or
updated under warranty, ( sale of
Sorry to labour the point, not only I, but hundreds of others,
have purchased multiple copies of SMSQ/E with various bits and
bobs over many years. Don't tell me now that the copies Roy Wood
sells of SMSQ Gold which has been altered (not just repaired) is
illegal, and that I am a pirate.
Just
Ummm, that's exactly what I said. Not only source has intellectual
property rights. The compiled code does too. If they're forced to include
the results of their labors (if any) into every other version, regardless
then two things happen:
Funnily enough that evil commercial software developer
??? 7/11/2002 2:26:05 ??, ?/? Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
Quick, somebody give that man some crayons!
Nah he won't like them unless they have an ARM processor and embedded Linux in
them ;-)
Phoebus
??? 7/11/2002 12:07:12 ??, ?/? Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
Before replying to Phoebus' post, I'd just like to say that I have the
utmost respect for someone who changes their mind after expressing a view
for so long.
Thanks.
Please here note that if TT had made a different point in his
??? 7/11/2002 1:02:47 ??, ?/? ZN [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
snip
Then what you really want to say in the licence would be that additions to
SMSQ/E to add a feature of capability to one platform will not be accepted
if it may seriously hinder or even prevent adding an equivalent feature or
You are quite welcome to a copy of the free version of SMSQ which was
supplied with it. I can email it to you if want. SMSQ/E was always a
paid version and you can buy that if you want.
Thank you for the offer but you didn't supply the QXL and I still have a
debt to the person who did.
Hmmm I hope majordomo likes this address more than my dokos-gr.net one...
It took up to 2 hours to resend the messages... we'll see how this one works
Phoebus
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phoebus Dokos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi all,
I just installed a 33MHz 68040 (no EC) on my QXL-II and I have the other
one (68EC040-25) as a spare. If anyone wants it, please let me know :-)
Phoebus
-- This mail was written using The Arachne Browser -
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uk, Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
What sort - naked QLs all over the place - with their 'bits' hanging out :o)
Only if YOU volunteer first, Norman :-)
... Everyone seems obsessed with those northern ladies ...
A QL Calendar could be a serious one or a fun
In article 016e01c285e4$89b874c0$2901a8c0@pc119, Darren Branagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Excellent Tony. Nice to hear something like this for a change.
Have we truly forgotten why the hell we all keep this up? I haven't.
I lug a huge bloody suitcase full of QL stuff across the Irish sea half a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], James
Hunkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
If anyone wants to take a look, it is at:
http://www.jdh-stech.com
I am working on the installer now and have a list of things still to
do. If all goes well, I will release QDT into a very limited Beta
around the end
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tarquin Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In 2000 I went to the London workshop, I saw the Q40 and liked it.
In 2001 I went to the Byfleet workshop, tried to purchase a Q40 but QBranch
and the Grafs had split, so could not.
In 2002 I will go to the London workshop, I
In article 012501c285fd$2ce12d50$0100a8c0@gamma, P Witte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman writes:
Has anyone thought of doing of doing a QL Calendar ?
Ill vote for you to be Mr January 2003 ;)
Thanks :-) ... I am up for the digital camera photo ... at the London
Show this coming
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Phoebus wrote:
I just installed a 33MHz 68040 (no EC) on my QXL-II and I have the other
one (68EC040-25) as a spare. If anyone wants it, please let me know :-)
Did you just invalidate yer warranty? :o)
I hope you stuck a good heatsink on the logic.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: TonyTebby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: [ql-users] Pirates and mad sheep
snip You sent this to the Supanet address so it is auto deleted,
there is the fault, see other email. I have never seen your
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 01:28:45, P Witte wrote:
(ref: 012601c285fd$2d6ddcf0$0100a8c0@gamma)
The
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] QL Calendar for 2003
What sort - naked QLs all over the place - with their 'bits' hanging
out :o)
Uh won't you need a license to
Την 7/11/2002 4:28:35 ��, ο/η Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
έγραψε:
Looks like you got yourself sorted out ... with Arachne ...
Now you can call me Spiderman...
I just what to know who this 'Quantum Leap' organisation is :-)
Oh just me... check URL: http://www.dokos-gr.net/ to find
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
On 6 Nov 2002, at 21:23, dndsystems1 wrote:
That is the wrong address you fool and you know it.
Hmm, it's the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
On 6 Nov 2002, at 22:26, dndsystems1 wrote:
Peter has paid the licences in advance of sales. Sales to the end
of
In article PJ62EACXUUP94YVTGBAUT2ZIG0S.3dcae0a4@quantumcentral,
Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hmmm I hope majordomo likes this address more than my dokos-gr.net one...
It took up to 2 hours to resend the messages... we'll see how this one works
Well ... you're on the board :-)
--
In message 005201c2864a$e385e4e0$0d5c933e@tony, TonyTebby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
BIG SNIP
Confidential in as much as you will not pass information on to any other
interested party, this way I can speak freely and as I want. Don't tell
Wolfgang, Marcel, Jochen etc. etc. On my part I must tell
- Original Message -
From: Roy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
Roy Wood - read this.
From Peter reguarding never ending story from you about illeagl
versions.
- Original Message -
From: Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, dndsystems1 wrote:
You cannot be serious, man. We have a contracted agreement with
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] What the QL is really all about
Insert warm rosy glow here !
Well done Tony.
Just what I said at the start of the current discourse?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
The issue I take with it is this notion that all versions of SMSQ/E must
be identical. I think this is not in SMSQ/E's best interest because it
discourages development.
We never said they have to be identical just 'coherent'.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.macnamaras.com
- Original Message -
From: Bill Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL Calendar for 2003
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
??? 7/11/2002 5:39:48 ??, ?/? Bill Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] What the QL is really all about
Insert warm rosy glow here !
Well
In message 023001c286b2$90e7b480$91f4193e@asusone, dndsystems1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Roy Wood - read this.
From Peter reguarding never ending story from you about illeagl
versions.
It was a bug in the memory manager. TT told me that he was desperately
searching but
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 22:31:35, Bill Waugh wrote:
(ref: 00c601c286ad$6ee41220$b06401d5@famwaugh)
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?
On
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 20:52:36, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tarquin Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In 2000 I went to the London workshop, I saw the Q40 and liked it.
In 2001 I went to the Byfleet workshop, tried to purchase a Q40 but QBranch
??? 7/11/2002 6:37:57 ??, ?/? Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
I would have thought a property magnate ( sheds ) with access to the
ear of Radio 4 would have been a natural (;-)
(8-)#
... and I now have seven sheds.
Hmmm a clear win for PM Blair's policies Maybe they should turn it
At 00:19 08/11/2002, you wrote:
??? 7/11/2002 6:37:57 ??, ?/? Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
I would have thought a property magnate ( sheds ) with access to the
ear of Radio 4 would have been a natural (;-)
(8-)#
... and I now have seven sheds.
Hmmm a clear win for PM Blair's
Dave P writes:
Of course, now he's going to get a bunch of emails from his devotees
telling him how wonderful he is. I really should get started on mine, so I
have to go now.
I already sent mine. Looking forward to read yours ;)
Per
On 7 Nov 2002, at 17:07, Dave P wrote:
(different possibilities on different machines)
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but, obviously it is something.
I distinctly seem to remember that, as long as something is useful
only for one machine, I see no problem in putting it in the code for
On 7 Nov 2002, at 23:21, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(...). Which license would it be under, old or new??
This would be the new licence. But, anyway, for the end user
nothing much has changed, apart from the fact that, if they are
technically literate, they can get the sources and tinker with
On 7 Nov 2002, at 21:11, Michael Berger wrote:
Hello Everybody!
I am SO tired of that endless piracy discussion.
Do you really believe anybody likes it?
On the othe rhand, if there is really a problem like that, shouldn't
you be told?
(..)
This is my advice to the involved parties:
On 7 Nov 2002, at 21:46, dndsystems1 wrote:
But he has asked you, correct.
Not after the licence came into force correct...
You have not told him, correct. So I do
not know, correct.
You are selling them. correct. You must ask correct. You didn't
still correct. etc...
This is a
71 matches
Mail list logo
