Hello Sniffer folks,
We have discovered that some testing code escaped into the latest
tarball: snf-server-3.0.12.tar.gz
This testing code intentionally causes SNFServer to crash (seg fault)
under special conditions. This was done so that we could examine the
resulting core dump.
You may
044
x7010
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail t
Yes, the errors have now stopped with the new update. The issue ran across
all servers so I must have corrupted the last update at some point.
Thanks for the speedy response!
--Paul
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com]On Behalf
Of Pete
affiliate marketing. Sent with
lots of word salad).
Andrew 8)
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware
Hello Message Sniffer Folks,
We're recommending a change in the default settings for message sniffer
in order to improve our response times for new campaigns. The change is
small and enhances our virtual spamtrap technology so that we see new
spams sooner and with greater sampling coverage
because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode
it one way or the other.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:56 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Change in default settings
Hello Message Sniffer Folks,
We're
-1044
x7010
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http
Great. I'll remove the erroneous comment I made in my configuration
files.
FWIW, I've set both peek-one-in='3' and grab-one-in='3' as the new
recommended default.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent
Hi Sniffer Folks,
Many of you who use Imail also use the imail1.exe command line utility
to send yourself updates and reports from your system. Be advised (if
you don't already know) that this program has been removed from IMail
and there does not appear to be a replacement at this time
Pete, now that Microsoft has taken down the Rustock botnet, what's your
telemetry say about spam volumes? Any significant change?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2011/03/18/taking-down
-botnets-microsoft-and-the-rustock-botnet.aspx
On 3/18/2011 4:17 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Pete,
now that Microsoft has taken down the Rustock botnet, what's
your telemetry say about spam volumes? Any significant
change?
I don't see a dent.
hours. IPv4 only has 4.3
billion IP addresses.
Pete: Grab a cup of coffee. The botNet's are coming...
--Paul
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list
b.blok...@tio.nl / www.tio.nl
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] Namens
Peer-to-Peer (Support)
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 maart 2011 14:25
Aan: Message Sniffer Community
Onderwerp: [sniffer] IPv6
Hi everyone,
I've been thinking about
Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti
Hi Sniffer Folks,
Just a quick note to let you know we've updated the MS Windows version
of our Anti Spam / Anti Malware plugin for CommunigGate Pro.
http://www.armresearch.com/products/SNF4CGP.jsp
http://www.armresearch.com/message-sniffer/download/CGPSNF-Win32-Intel.zip
We have rewritten
Hi guys,
We're seeing a lot of FPs on 3741490 this morning. I've added a RulePanic for
it in our systems.
Roughly 150 FPs from 6:55am until a few minutes ago...
Darin.
is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
-
From: Pete McNeil
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:27 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: RulePanic on 3741490
On 1/7/2011 10:19 AM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi guys,
We're seeing a lot of FPs on 3741490 this morning. I've added a RulePanic
for it in our systems
Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam
rule for active/inactive state. I assume some
sort of push mechanism to all subscribers, to notify their systems that a rule
is no longer valid, is what you're planning here.
Best.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Friday, January 07
-
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
866-770-1044
x7010
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniff
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We have had a bad rule event.
The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by 1030E.
The bad rules were discovered by our IP/Rule conflict instrument
indicating that most were automatically rejected by Auto-Panic features.
The rules were part of a rule family designed
Hi Pete,
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We have had a bad rule event.
The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by 1030E.
[...]
Regarding this event A while ago we talked about sniffer installations
exchanging rule-panic info via the GUBdb sync info as that is happening every
(few
On 12/16/2010 11:07 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi Pete,
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We have had a bad rule event.
The bad rules were created near 0830E, and removed by
1030E
Hello Sniffer Folks,
This is just a quick note to touch base. It's been a while since we've
had an update, and the list is so quiet!
* Over the past few days we've finished a major re-tuning of our
rulebase compiler system. The improved rulebase compiler bots are just a
bit smarter
Hi Guys, I would be interested in testing this ..
--
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware
I have seen one hit, and it looks like a false positive to me. Sent as a
sample to the false@ address.
Thanks for the heads-up, Darin.
Andrew.
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, August 17
spam.
_M
--
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:31 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Rule Panic on 3364665
I have seen one hit, and it looks like a false positive to me. Sent as a sample
to the false@ address.
Thanks for the heads-up, Darin.
Andrew
Thanks, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:37 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Rule Panic on 3364665
On 8/17/2010 3:10 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi,
We've had a lot of FPs on this rule, and wanted to alert
are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail
of MessageSniffer into smartermail
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We are working on testing and improving direct integration options with
Smarter Mail.
The current option is very simple. We've posted a QA about it here:
http://www.armresearch.com/support/qa/integration/smarterMail.jsp
If you are interested in testing
On 6/9/2010 2:44 PM, Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We are working on testing and improving direct integration options
with Smarter Mail.
Shamelessly responding to my own post, I thought I would point out:
You do not need to re-install Message Sniffer to test this option. If
you
Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:02 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Direct SmarterMail integration -- Some Testers ?
On 6/9/2010 2:44 PM, Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We are working
Pete,
This is great news! It would also be a better option if you are able to
work with smarterTools directly and see about getting sniffer integrated as
a built in call when enabled. SmarterTools added an option for declude
integration a few years back and we have been waiting for a true
, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More
are able to work with
smarterTools directly and see about getting sniffer integrated as a
built in call when enabled.
We would love to do that.
Please ask them about it so that they know their customers are
interested in this !!
We are ready to work with them to develop a tight integration
Folks,
Having integrated Sniffer into MxScan for SmarterMail, I would like to
shared some of my thoughts :
1. From what I can see at the moment neither Commtouch nor Declude has
direct hooks into the SMTP sessions. Any integration at SMTP session level
would definitely require some changes from
On 5/29/2010 10:45 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
An annual donation is not a problem - of course, we are already paying for
Sniffer and supplying feedback that is incorporated into GBUdb - so to us
it's just another way to access information for which we are already
licensed (using an RBL instead
Hi,
In case anyone wants to use it in ORF, attached the updated definition file.
(Pete, I didn't post it on their newsgroup because I didn't know if you
wanted the word out).
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com
sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com
Hi,
An annual donation is not a problem - of course, we are already paying for
Sniffer and supplying feedback that is incorporated into GBUdb - so to us
it's just another way to access information for which we are already
licensed (using an RBL instead of the Sniffer API) - just a bit earlier
Hi Sniffer Folks,
The GBUdb.com web site is up http://www.gbudb.com
We have also updated the generator for the truncate.gbudb.net list so
that the TXT records include a link to the list descriptor at
http://www.gbudb.com/truncate/ and the IP address in [square brackets].
Please tell us what
.
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
I'm seeing it, too.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Peer-to-Peer (Support) suppor...@peertopeer.net
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:21 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Volume spike Mon 9AM EST
Just checking to see if anyone else is seeing
I am getting a lot of complaints from my customers concerning the huge
spikes too.
DustyC
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:51 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re
Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More
I'm not seeing any spike in inbound connections or accepted message
counts.
Actually, it's lower than Friday's volume and about the same as
Thursday.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Peer-to-Peer (Support)
Sent
. That probably means that
I'm finding users with zombie infected computers, but I'm letting that
mail in, so checking which IP addresses were hit is a small problem if I
want to contact those people.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com
--
From: Colbeck, Andrew acolb...@bentall.com
Reply-To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:03:27 -0700
I looked at the effectiveness of this test and I like what I'm seeing.
The volume isn't high, but it is making a difference in the edge cases
That is the case here as well. I should have clarified that in my earlier
post. Sniffer is doing its job. Unfortunately I am running through two
levels of spam filtering systems and a ton is getting through still.
DustyC
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif
Hi Pete,
No. Not leakage. Sniffer et al are doing their job well.
Just a large spike in incoming spam volume. It settled down for us by about
11am.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@armresearch.com
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
On 5/10/2010 12:23 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Pete,
No. Not leakage. Sniffer et al are doing their job well.
Just a large spike in incoming spam volume. It settled down for us by about
11am.
I checked on telemetry and found a mixed bag -- some systems were up
quite a bit-- others were
Sniffer is doing its job well, but I am nearly overwhelmed by the load - to
the point where I might have to turn sniffer off to reduce my processing
footprint. I've already commented out INVURIBL.
My customers don't like lag at all.
That being said, I wonder how I can better protect myself
On 5/10/2010 2:15 PM, Michael Cummins wrote:
Sniffer is doing its job well, but I am nearly overwhelmed by the load - to
the point where I might have to turn sniffer off to reduce my processing
footprint. I've already commented out INVURIBL.
My customers don't like lag at all.
That being said
Is there a way we could get a SNIFFER feature like that implemented as an
internal DECLUDE test?
Barring that, perhaps get it to write a text file of current IPs to block?
-- Michael Cummins
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
On 5/10/2010 2:37 PM, Michael Cummins wrote:
Is there a way we could get a SNIFFER feature like that implemented as an
internal DECLUDE test?
SNFIPREP and SNFIP tests give you some direct access to GBUdb -- of
course at that point you've already accepted the message for scanning
even
Cummins
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http
so.
_M
--
Chief Scientist
ARM Research Labs, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti
.
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer
0.2, p 0.9 for [205.188.84.131]
I'll send the whole header to support@ in case you are interested in
this particular IP.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:03 AM
, LLC
www.armresearch.com
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More
On 4/30/2010 5:54 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Pete,
I'm look over Declude's recommended Sniffer configuration and trying to
understand how much (if any) overlap there is between these options they
implemented and recommend:
This was cross-posted from the Declude.JunkMail list and I
Hello Sniffer Folks,
RFC 5782 states:
IPv4-based DNSxLs MUST NOT contain an entry for 127.0.0.1.
and also states:
The A record contents conventionally have the value 127.0.0.2
So we will be changing the result code for truncate.gbudb.net to
127.0.0.2 effective immediately.
Thanks!
_M
Hi Pete,
I'm look over Declude's recommended Sniffer configuration and trying to
understand how much (if any) overlap there is between these options they
implemented and recommend:
IPREPUTATIONSNFIPREPx 0 10 -5
SNFIPCAUTIONSNFIP x
Hi Sniffer Folks,
We have been testing a blacklist based on real-time GBUdb data
(generated from Message Sniffer).
We have decided to experiment with opening up the blacklist for a wider
audience and so as of now you can use truncate.gbudb.net as an ip4r test.
You should get a result
I've added it as a warn_if_reject on a backup mx that only seems to
process junk...
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:08 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Opening
list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig
For what it is worth, there are zero hits on my two servers for this
Rule. I looked back through the last 7 days.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On
Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 9:48 AM
To: Message
to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to sniffer-dig
Hello Sniffer Folks,
We have posted two new files to our products page containing an upgrade
to our Message Sniffer for Spam Assassin plugin:
Message Sniffer Client/Server for *Nix (Linux, BSD, OSX, etc...)
http://www.armresearch.com/message-sniffer/download/snf-server-3.0.11.tar.gz
Message
I haven't had an update since 8:45am PST. Usually I'll have 3 or 4
updates in this period. Anything going on?
Thanks
Kevin
On 2/5/2010 11:44 AM, Pete McNeil wrote:
Hi Sniffer Folks,
After more back-end improvements and some careful analysis we have
increased our rulebase update rate
something
solid to work with if it continues.
Thanks for your fast assistance.
Regards,
--Paul
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com]on
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 6:29 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re
Congratulations. Keep up the good work!
. We do not have any spam-filtering on-premise at the moment. Only
inbound smtp is filtered by our colleagues in another part of the organization
(we are part of a university). So I'm just asking on this list because I know
that there is a lot of experts on this list (and I used sniffer when I ran
lead
to a higher rate of false positives.
Cheers
-Matt
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:snif...@sortmonster.com] On Behalf
Of Kaj Søndergaard Laursen
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 7:10 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Outgoing spam filtering
Hi
I have now
Hi Sniffer Folks,
After more back-end improvements and some careful analysis we have
increased our rulebase update rate by another 25%.
This will mean:
-- Less time for new spam to get through between updates
-- More accurate IP reputation information against new bots
-- Faster removal
Hey Pete,
Is there a hook to use Sniffer in SmarterMail 6?
I just had to move to SmarterMail rather than pay over $3k to upgrade iMail to
run on a 64bit windows box. I'm using eWall at this point for Message Sniffer
but may retire that with iMail.
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Pete McNeil wrote
Steve:
MxGuard is availabe for SmarterMail now.
Eric
--Original Message--
From: Pete McNeil
Sender: Message Sniffer Community
To: Message Sniffer Community
ReplyTo: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: New proactive false positive preventioninitiatives
Sent: Feb 4, 2010 14:25
We're noticing a lot of FPs on this rule, and have added a RulePanic entry.
Pete, is there a problem with it?
Darin.
in place.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 9:02 AM
Subject: [sniffer] RulePanic on 2908567
We're noticing a lot of FPs on this rule, and have added a RulePanic entry.
Pete, is there a problem with it?
Darin.
you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E
, but with
the rule panic in place.
Our auto-panic monitoring system also shows that many systems panicked
the rule on their own.
_M
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list
We're still seeing hits. I assume the rule removal hasn't propagated to our
rulebase yet?
BTW, we were seeing hits on the rule across a broad range of emails that
related to passport.com.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@armresearch.com
To: Message Sniffer
are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail
Hello sniffer folks,
I'm testing a dns based blocking list for a future product release.
The list works in the usual way and is derived from GBUdb IP reputation
data.
The list I want to test contains IPs that are statistically in the
Truncate range from the perspective of the larger cloud
Hi Pete,
We would be interested in testing the DNSBL.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@armresearch.com
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 12:48 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Testing a black-list,.. want to help
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer
of your
resolver so that we can update the ACLs.
Thanks!
_M
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware
Andy,
Did you ever get the new Declude implemented on your mail server, so
that Sniffer isn't an external test any longer? If so, was it hard to
implement?
Pete,
With the new Declude with Message Sniffer built into it, would I
still need to purchase a Sniffer license each year
are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: sniffer-...@sortmonster.com
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail
Daniel Ivey wrote:
Pete,
With the new Declude with Message Sniffer built into it, would I
still need to purchase a Sniffer license each year?
Yes. However if you're using the built-in SNF you will get that from
Declude. They may change their pricing at some point to include
. It was unavailable for several hours but it is running fine now.
Best,
_M
#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Pete,
I saw their announcement.
Dave says they are using THEIR rule base (not the one specific to the
Sniffer customer).
Yes. They have an OEM license now which allows them to embed Message
Sniffer in their products with their own rulebase. This is simpler for
OEMs
Hello Sniffer Folks,
The Declude folks have announced version 4.10.42.
With this version Declude now integrates Message Sniffer via our DLL.
Benefits:
* Improved performance
-- Not an external test, so no program must be launched
-- Uses the message already in RAM thus saving disk IO
Hi Pete,
I saw their announcement.
Dave says they are using THEIR rule base (not the one specific to the
Sniffer customer).
Any hints what I have to do (on the Sniffer side) to move over to their
service? Which part of my current stand-alone installation do I have to
undo (e.g., the Sniffer
Hello Sniffer Folks,
On behalf of all at ARM Research Labs, I would like to personally wish
you and yours a happy and prosperous new year!
Most folks hear about Message Sniffer from our customers, and we really
appreciate that. This January we have a special reason to encourage you
to share
201 - 300 of 2910 matches
Mail list logo
