Hi Kenny,
nice to see you mapping around. I've been a bit idle recently, due to an
overload of work in dayjob. I have no particular interest in mapping landuse
myself, so I would welcome any bulk import that is allowed.
I would love to hear if you make any progress.
Greetings good luck,
Kenny Knecht wrote:
One that is certainly feasable is the european Corine Land cover 2000: that
gives information about land use.
on the website http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/landuse/clc-download I read
that *The information in under copyright of EEA and in the public domai*
n...
Which is
but I think the NGI won't even consider doing that. In the import
It's certainly worth it to ask and explore this, before we turn all our
attention to CLC2000.
I also believe we should explore the Freedom of Information acts more.
Especially the Federal Decree has some interesting sections on
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:44:53AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Unless you're willing sign something that says I agree that OSMF will
make two attempts to contact me at my registered e-mail address with
information on how to vote on an upcoming license change
Is there someone who know more about the Inspire EU directive for
Geodata from 2007, and can highlight things that are important for
Openstreetmap? They are working on the implementation here in Sweden,
it would be of great help to get any input.
The only thing, I've found, that is interesting
El Jueves, 7 de Enero de 2010, Erik Johansson escribió:
Is there someone who know more about the Inspire EU directive for
Geodata from 2007, and can highlight things that are important for
Openstreetmap? They are working on the implementation here in Sweden,
it would be of great help to get
Dear Erik,
The INSPIRE directive addresses first and foremost the sharing of spatial data
between public authorities, both from a technical point of view and from an
organisational point of view. On a second level, it also addresses public
access to network services. It is important for
In England the work of what our colonial brothers and sisters on the paranoid
side of the Atlantic call a 'public notary' is one of the things done by a
'solicitor' - whereas over there a 'solicitor' is more likely to be working in
the less salubrious parts of town and may need the services of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
In Lausanne I have similar problems with public external lift !
http://maps.google.fr/maps?q=Lausanneie=UTF8hq=hnear=Lausanne,+Vaud,+Suissell=46.521806,6.623316spn=0.000784,0.002064t=hz=20
CU
Stéphane
Ture Pålsson a écrit :
How should I
2010/1/5 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk
A structure with 2 nodes one above the other would be necessary for
things like this:
http://www.schmickler-metallbau.de/images/ref/WBH/Niederehe_Leiter.jpg
I believe that one node is sufficient. This node must have no
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
way (level=0) --- node (highway=ladder) --- way (level=1)
Ooops - wrong tag. That should have been :
way (layer=0) --- node (highway=ladder) --- way (layer=1)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
But I ask if it is valid for OSM or not, I know SCO vs * was extreme,
but that doesn't mean it is valid for us. Can you point on some
similarities in evidence, cercumstances, factors that can make this a
valid case? If not it is the same as Larry Flynt vs America or most
lawsuits.
On Wed, Jan 6,
2010/1/6 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
But I ask if it is valid for OSM or not, I know SCO vs * was extreme,
but that doesn't mean it is valid for us. Can you point on some
similarities in evidence, cercumstances, factors that can make this a
valid case? If not it is the same as Larry
Hi, I tried like this
http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/01/30/geoserver-and-openstreetmap/ to
import osm-data into Postgresql. I used EPSG 25833 (but I also tried
900913).
Same with ja...@dellmo3:/usr/share/osm2pgsql$ osm2pgsql -s -C 2000 -E
25833 -U janes -W -d gis planet.osm
I run Postgresql
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:15 AM, janes huff h...@radinformix.de wrote:
Hi, I tried like this
http://blog.geoserver.org/2009/01/30/geoserver-and-openstreetmap/ to
import osm-data into Postgresql. I used EPSG 25833 (but I also tried
900913).
Same with ja...@dellmo3:/usr/share/osm2pgsql$
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:06:42 +, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:44:53AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Oh yes it does, because if someone isn't active any more it will become
harder and harder to get an opinion out of him. Someone who is not
active any more
Ok, Now I got you, basically anybody that might be able to claim to be
copyright holder of any data we put into the database might be able to
open a lawsuit against us to exhaust us out of business, not necessary
to win the case. With the list of potential sources of information
that can be claimd
I have seen tendences to an edit war on Key:religion [1] with a
possible spread to Key:denomination [2]. No matter if Pastafarianism
is a legimit religion or not, this edit war will not benefit anybody.
I have added a section on Talk:Key:religion where those oposing the
Pastafarians being
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
I was claiming it's possible to launch a
friverlous lawsuit with no basis and keep it going on for years and
effectively bankrupt the competition in the process.
OSMF is located in the UK, right? Doesn't the UK have
In other words, stop the edit war, discuss pros and cons on the talk
page, and be open to include more rather than remove. If it is
concluded as not a religion than find alternative tagging.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion
[2]
office=lawyer should definitely exist if it doesn't exist it should be
added, any reason not to add this feature?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested some time ago to use a new general key for such things
(when it's not really an amenity, a shop or a
I like the idea of office=laywer, office=notary
maybe we need this, no?
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested some time ago to use a new general key for such things
(when it's not
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 05.01.2010 17:41, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
I have found that only Turks have public notary as mapping feature
(amenity=notary)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Map_Features
Do you think we should make this
Greg,
Greg Troxel wrote:
and (more or less) the community views it as such as
evidenced by holding services of some kind with some attendance. This
latter part is necessary to exclude Joe putting up a church of Joe in
his front yard; the town would then say joe is a nutcase, as opposed
to
Am 06.01.2010 15:41, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm not against amenity=notary, but it really has to be used more often ...
I didn't use it BECAUSE it is not listed as legal POI on OSM wiki.
Am I doing it wrong? I
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm newbie on OSM and as I can see we have only Yahoo imagery as
base to map some cities on Brasil (only some bigger ones)
Recently I read on wiki that a service called nearmaps host maps to
be used on OSM.
I know a service on
Looking the history of this node::
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/444087845/history
it seems that a website www.freietonne.de is sending all comments
about a marina into OSM changesets.
Could some Germans contact the www.freietonne.de site to stop this ?
Pieren
On 06/01/10 15:46, Pieren wrote:
Looking the history of this node::
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/444087845/history
it seems that a website www.freietonne.de is sending all comments
about a marina into OSM changesets.
Could some Germans contact the www.freietonne.de site to stop
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I'm wondering if they are mirroring their database into OSM or something and
spam in there database is infecting us?
Yes. This particular node and its 104 versions has a tag called
ft_link pointing to their marina object
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:56 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm newbie on OSM and as I can see we have only Yahoo imagery as
base to map some cities on Brasil (only some bigger ones)
Recently I read on wiki that a service
Hi, I'm really happy that people want to host it. Answering questions:
I'm newbie, I don't know how things works, I just would like to see
the images able to be used on Potlatch, something like what Nearmaps
did.
Ian Dees: I didn't find any alternate host. All messages about host
the images are on
Hi,
Pieren wrote:
Yes. This particular node and its 104 versions has a tag called
ft_link pointing to their marina object (Position bearbeiten (FT-ID:
7982 | OSM-ID: 444087845 H):
http://www.freietonne.de/index.php?site=38editgps=7982
I have already alerted the guy who's running the FT
2010/1/6 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
We should remember that the purpose of maps is to represent reality to
map users, not to make political points.
says who? Maps have always and in all ages been means of politics...
;-)
cheers,
Martin
___
talk
2010/1/6 enqd e...@ymail.com
Hi, I'm really happy that people want to host it. Answering questions:
I'm newbie, I don't know how things works, I just would like to see
the images able to be used on Potlatch, something like what Nearmaps
did.
just to be sure (as you're a newby): under what
Finally, I got it. It's not a rendering issue but huge polygon showing
the German Yahoo hi-res imagery :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44173524
linked with other similar boxes by a multipolygon relation named
Germany as outers:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/371423
I will
2010/1/6 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Just a thought - I haven't thought this through - could relation be used to
form a close relationship between a road and a track?
Sorry if this has been mentioned before.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations#Proposed_uses_of_Relations
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 06.01.2010 15:41, schrieb Valent Turkovic:
... I didn't understand that people just use keys
that they want no matter it there aren't listed in OSM features list
on Wiki...
...
If there's no such thing in the
Hi Martin, I don't know the specific license, but the email I received said:
Can be used for any purpose, need only cite the source.
2010/1/6 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/1/6 enqd e...@ymail.com
Hi, I'm really happy that people want to host it. Answering questions:
I'm
On an email asking that they said: (roughly translation)
The content in our portal is public domain. However their utilization
in other portals or publications is conditioned to citing the source,
when utilizing our data. It is possible to reproduce the graphs, art
and images that are together,
I think this have been stated 3 or 4 times in this thread already,
that this data is PD.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Arlindo Pereira
openstreet...@arlindopereira.com wrote:
On an email asking that they said: (roughly translation)
The content in our portal is public domain. However their
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm really happy that people want to host it. Answering questions:
I'm newbie, I don't know how things works, I just would like to see
the images able to be used on Potlatch, something like what Nearmaps
did.
If you can't find
Hi Anthony, I follow Openaerialmap, but as you said I don't know when
the service will be up.
I'll wait an answer from Ian Dees to see if he will host it, so maybe
when OAM be running we can transfer the data to them.
2010/1/6 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, enqd
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:49:37AM -0500, Rob Myers wrote:
Unless that is the only way of ensuring that everyone continues to have the
advantage of effectively all rights to the data and that organisation is
OSM. ;-)
Well, yes, so why isn’t OSM just going PD (or near equivalent)? :)
(Yes, I
Hello everyone,
If you are a Queenslander and want to see the CommonMap objectives[1] brought to
life, please attend an initiation meeting at 7pm on Saturday 16th January at the
Samford Valley Hotel. This event will be held in conjunction with the
OpenStreetMap Samford Mapping Party[2].
It should be a good carrot for OAM to know that we are talking about 5
Brazillian states complete, if I remember right, the states of Santa
Catarina, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and Goias. Too bad
my state of Espírito Santo isn't covered.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:06 PM, enqd
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi Anthony, I follow Openaerialmap, but as you said I don't know when
the service will be up.
I'll wait an answer from Ian Dees to see if he will host it, so maybe
when OAM be running we can transfer the data to them.
Can you let me
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, enqd e...@ymail.com wrote:
Hi Anthony, I follow Openaerialmap, but as you said I don't know when
the service will be up.
I'll wait an answer from Ian Dees to see if he will host it, so maybe
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
If not, the first step in avoiding such a lawsuit would be to reincorporate
in another state with sane laws.
FFS. Sane laws? Think a little before you post, please.
Steve
___
talk
2010/1/6 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was claiming it's possible to launch a
friverlous lawsuit with no basis and keep it going on for years and
effectively bankrupt the competition in the process.
OSMF is located in
Thanks Aun for explaining,
Ian: any idea when we will be able to see the images? It's an easy
process or take time?
Any progress tell us. Thanks.
2010/1/6 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, enqd
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:15 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/6 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
We must find a procedure to avoid such lawsuits. i.e. show us where
some community members have copied you and we remove the information
from your sources kind of response
2010/1/7 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:15 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/6 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
We must find a procedure to avoid such lawsuits. i.e. show us where
some community members have copied you and we remove the
How would one write a mapnik/osm2pgsql ruleset to render subway
entrances at a certain zoom level?
Example data with relations:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/359558
--
/emj
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2010/1/7 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
How would one write a mapnik/osm2pgsql ruleset to render subway
entrances at a certain zoom level?
Image of stairs going down?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
hello list,
can anyone please tell me how to do a dirty revert? unfortunately by
the date i received a reply from dwg another user changed the affected
nodes (originally an import from google api).
thank you,
joe
___
talk mailing list
Beste Talk'ers,
Kwam dit net op Tweakers.net tegen:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/64718/ces-parrot-laat-minihelikopter-via-iphone-bedienen.html
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas de Lange
--
Best regards,
Bas de Lange
http://www.basdelange.com
___
Al enige tijd probeer ik voor restaurants en fast food zaken ook een
'cuisine'-tag aan te geven. Mijn vraag is, wat doen we met cafetaria's
als cuisine? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine stelt hier
friture voor, maar ik denk dat de gemiddelde Nederlander die tag
niet zal begrijpen. Op
Andre Engels wrote:
cafetaria tegen - volgens mij min of meer hetzelfde. Ik zou graag
zien dat we hier één waarde voor konden afspreken - maar welke dan?
Ik praat puur voor mezelf: ik heb eerder een paar keer
cuisine=dutch_snackbar gebruikt, met het idee dat dat uniek genoeg is om
later
Steve Bennett wrote:
Interesting. What strikes me about the street names thing is that in
general, there's actually no way to prove it, other than by the
person's own admission. Whereas with copyright breach in general, you
can show a similarity between two expressions of an idea. But
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/5 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
I was testing the Garmin's route instructions on some familiar roads today.
Normally it says "SW on Northern Road to Roundabout", followed by "2nd exit
on roundabout" or similar. but one part came out as ""SW on
One that amuses me often, is between Canberra and Batemans Bay. Theres
a small rural street which is shown as 'Black Sally Lane' on both
google, whereis and my Navman GPS, however OSM shows the name printed on
the street sign, which is 'Black Sallee Lane'.
David
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 23:41
2010/1/6 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
The roundabout was named as The Northern Road in the OSM data - the same
name as the road to the north and south of it.
I meant in reality, most roundabouts aren't named, although some are.
___
Talk-au
2010/1/6 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
You're right, Steve, there is no way to prove it. What we need to be sure of
is that our own actions are ethical, and in the spirit of OSM. I do use a
street directory, along with some online sources, to verify street names, or
to check spelling. I
John Smith wrote:
2010/1/6 Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au:
The roundabout was named as "The Northern Road" in the OSM data - the same
name as the road to the north and south of it.
I meant in reality, most roundabouts aren't named, although some are.
It's not
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
You're right, Steve, there is no way to prove it. What we need to be sure
of is that our own actions are ethical, and in the spirit of OSM. I *do*use a
street directory, along with some online sources, to verify street
I've created an entry on the default access restrictions wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia
Now we can debate each line:
=== Motorway===
I left this as default. In Australia, some freeways allow bikes and farm
machinery, some don't.
2010/1/6 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I've created an entry on the default access restrictions wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia
Now we can debate each line:
===Trunk===
Default. Ok?
There are some trunk roads in Perth
David Murn wrote:
One that amuses me often, is between Canberra and Batemans Bay. Theres
a small rural street which is shown as 'Black Sally Lane' on both
google, whereis and my Navman GPS, however OSM shows the name printed on
the street sign, which is 'Black Sallee Lane'.
Both are accepted
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
===Footway==
Now, bicycles aren't allowed on footpaths - ie, the path that runs along
the side of the road. But they're generally allowed on most other paths,
like into or through parks, around sports grounds etc. So I propose
foot=designated
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
===Cycleway===
I would say shared use paths vastly outnumber bike-only paths, so I propose
bicycle=designated foot=designated. Horse...no? Paths that allow horses,
like rail trails, aren't too rare, but can be catered
Hi,
Great maps ! Although the Armidale map shows street names and the Carnarvon
one doesn't
regards
Darylr
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:17 AM, James Andrewartha
tr...@student.uwa.edu.auwrote:
===Bridleway===
I would have said we don't have these, except I think I found one on the
outskirts of the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. With the tiny bit of
traffic
they must receive, I can't imagine that
2010/1/7 dar...@tpg.com.au:
Hi,
Great maps ! Although the Armidale map shows street names and the Carnarvon
one doesn't
Carnarvon was only mapped from imagery, and I don't think anyone has
attempted to contact the local council to get names, or driven through
the town to obtain them
2010/1/7 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
===Footway==
Now, bicycles aren't allowed on *footpaths* - ie, the path that runs along
the side of the road. But they're generally allowed on most other paths,
like into or
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:49 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
Why? Just because you happen to live in a state where that happens to
be the case, doesn't mean I do. If I tagged a footpath, I would expect
bikes ARE allowed by default, because they are here. Setting defaults
for this is going to be
David Murn wrote:
Im fairly sure ACT law doesnt allow riding on footpaths, only designated
bicycle paths.
All footpaths are shared paths (foot and bicycle traffic) in the ACT.
John
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Nope. See this:
http://www.netspeed.com.au/cr/bicycle/features/footpath.htm
in particular:
LEGISLATION
Legal authority to enable cyclists to use all footpaths was provided
in a 1974 amendment of the ACT Traffic Act 1937 (2), which stated
that:
A person shall not - ...drive, ride or wheel a
2010/1/7 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:49 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
From a quick skim of the wiki, it seems that 'bicycle=yes' means that
bicycles are allowed on the way, where 'bicycle=designated' means the
bike has right of way. Bikes have right of way on
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
This was my basic understanding as well, which is why I get confused
when I see people talking about marking paths with stuff like
bicycle=designated and foot=designated. They can't both have right of
way.
Are you
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/7 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 10:49 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
From a quick skim of the wiki, it seems that 'bicycle=yes' means that
bicycles are allowed on the way, where
Oi Ednei,
Eu recebi uma resposta parecida com a sua, há um tempo atrás. O que eles
dizem é que os dados são de domínio público, desde que citada a fonte.
Abs,
Vitor
-- Forwarded message --
From: Atendimento IBGE i...@ibge.gov.br
Date: 2009/1/8
Subject: Dúvidas sobre as
Olá pessoal, postei na lista em Inglês do OSM a respeito da hospedagem das
ortofotos do IBGE e algumas pessoas se dispuseram a ajudar nesse sentido,
veja o tópico para ler as respostas:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-January/046733.html
2010/1/6 Vitor George
Oi gente
Com ajuda do Hackermike/h4ck3rm1k3/Mike DuPonte, eu tem um planemetria
de Vitoria do .dwg convertido pela .osm dados. Agora eu trabalhando
marcar as ruas do Vitoria e preparar para importar os dados. Nao poder
importar os dados direito, tem muito obras manual para fazer. Algum
quer me
Suche mal die Präsentation raus, die ein User und ich vor einiger Zeit beim
Katasteramt vorgeführt haben.
dafür würde ich das auch als erstes gerne nutzen !
gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Moin,
Sven Anders schrieb:
In der Hoffung das damit das Thema TMC vielleicht ein paar mehr Leuten
näher gebracht werden kann.
Super, jetzt kann auch ich die kryptischen Daten zuordnen.
Alternativ kann man unter:
http://osm-tmc.anders-hamburg.de/area.php?lcd=1
Verstehe ja, das im
Stefano meinte wohl keine mautpflichtigen Brücken, sondern die
Schnellstraßen überspannenden Konstruktionen zur Mauterfassung:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mautbrücke
Genau die meinte ich. :-)
Stefano
___
Talk-de mailing list
Am 05.01.10 14:05, schrieb Mirko Küster:
wie werden die deutschen Mautbrücken getaggt?
Aktuell noch nichts offizielles.
Nimm doch vorerst erstmal als Node oder Way:
highway=toll_bridge
operator=Toll Collect GmbH
Ok, das ist ja mal ein Anfang.
Stefano
Moin !
Sollte nicht ein Node
highway=tollbridge ausreichen ??
Gruß jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 5. Januar 2010 17:56 schrieb Sven Anders s...@anders-hamburg.de:
Verbesserungsvorschläge gerne an die Liste:
Hohe Prio:
- Die Punkte eines Segments sollten wie bei den Roads sortiert
dargestellt werden.
bsp. http://osm-tmc.anders-hamburg.de/segment.php?lcd=8531
- Es soll geprüft werden, ob
Am 6. Januar 2010 11:34 schrieb Georg Feddern ne...@bavarianmallet.de:
Weitere Frage:
Einige TMC-Points (sic!, nicht Area, die habe ich jeweils auf die
Gemeinde-Relation gelegt) liegen quasi im Ortskern der Gemeinde bzw. auf
oder in der Nähe der früheren Hauptverbindungswege.
Macht es Sinn,
sorry habe posting von mirko mit
highway=toll_bridge
operator=Toll Collect GmbH
nicht gelesen!
hat einer schon eine idee für ein symbol in josm ?
gruß Jan :-)
06.01.2010 11:47, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Moin !
Sollte nicht ein Node
highway=tollbridge ausreichen ??
Gruß jan :-)
Hi !
ich habe mir in der letzten Zeit vermehr die Max-Values angesehen und
festgestellt das viele verschiedene Schreibweisen vorliegen für die Werte.
* mit den Maßeinheiten
* Punkt und Komma als Dezimaltrennung
* mit 0 im Nachkomma-Bereich (unkritisch)
Sollte es nicht einen Automatismus geben
Sollte es nicht einen Automatismus geben der diese Werte vereinheitlicht ??
Macht in meinen Augen wenig Sinn, denn keiner der von Dir
beschriebenen Fälle ist falsch. Es sind, wie Du schon sagst,
verschiedene Schreibweisen/Konventionen/Präferenzen und egal wie
häufig Du das bereinigst es wird
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Hi !
ich habe mir in der letzten Zeit vermehr die Max-Values angesehen und
festgestellt das viele verschiedene Schreibweisen vorliegen für die Werte.
* mit den Maßeinheiten
Standard sind die SI-Einheiten - also Meter und metrische Tonnen, die
brauchen also nicht
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
ich habe mir in der letzten Zeit vermehr die Max-Values angesehen und
festgestellt das viele verschiedene Schreibweisen vorliegen für die Werte.
Wirkt für OSM-Verhältnisse harmlos. ;-)
* mit den Maßeinheiten
Es ist Standard, den Wert in örtlichen Maßeinheiten
Die Anzeige des 'Fehlers' ist also richtig, oder sehe ich das falsch? ;-)
Das ist kein Fehler sondern ein noch gültiger und auch in JOSM angebotener
Schlüssel. Was im Fall von simplen Bushaltestellen auch noch immer
ausreichend und für Leute die durch die Relationskaskade nicht durchblicken
Moin Ingrid,
Georg Feddern schrieb:
Alternativ kann man unter:
http://osm-tmc.anders-hamburg.de/area.php?lcd=1
Verstehe ja, das im TMC nicht alle Gemeinden und Straßen enthalten sein
müssen.
In der obigen Auflistung fehlen aber auch Roads und Segmente, denen über
die Karte
On Dienstag, 5. Januar 2010, SLXViper wrote:
Werner Hoch schrieb:
Die type-Tags halte ich allein deshalb für enorm wichtig, damit man
das taggingschema herausfinden kann.
Stimmt eigentlich. Ich hab die jetzt mal ergänzt und vereinheitlicht.
Villingen und Umland bis Furtwangen und das
Moin !
bei uns hat in Lübeck einer mit der Verwendung von maxspeed=DE:urban [1]
angefangen. So ganz fürndig bin ich im Wiki noch nicht gefunden.
Sollte das nun verwendet werden oder nicht - wenn ja wäre es klasse,
wenn die MaxValue-Karte es entsprechend berücksichtigen würde -
langfristig
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Moin !
bei uns hat in Lübeck einer mit der Verwendung von maxspeed=DE:urban [1]
angefangen. So ganz fürndig bin ich im Wiki noch nicht gefunden.
Hast du schon http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed gesehen?
___
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
