not agree?
By the way - you are the one who has set the tone for this
response. This is the fruit of your ministry. Accusing me of
preaching the occult is not going to fly.
jd
l message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.Amen Dean,JD I figure you were thinking of Prover
Lance obviously has a very active and prolific
imagination David. I have disagreed
with youabout a point or two and have yet to
receive even a hint of "veiled threats
or warnings" Apparently we live in two different
dimensions (Lance and I, that is)
judytFrom: "David Miller" [EMAIL
No, "anyone" is not included - only those who come with
the right heart attitude.
God hides things from the "wise and prudent" and
reveals them to babes. judyt
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I assume you to be using say/mean synonymously, Dean? Anyone can open the bible in order to see
that BSF will not agree? By the way - you are the
one who has set the tone for this response. This is the fruit of your
ministry. Accusing me of preaching the occult is not
going to fly.
jd
l message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.Amen Dean, JD I figure you were think
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:49:25 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every single item on the list is an argued belieffrom either you or
Judy Taylor.
You don't like it because when it is all put together, it is rather
embarrassing.
The "cult" thingy is written all ofver
Ppl didn't have to sin "before the cross" either JD.
Otherwise Jesus would not have told the
woman caught in adultery to "go and sin no more lest a
worse thing come upon you" We are
ignorant of these things because we cling to mens
doctrines that do not equate sin with destruction
and death
out her, it is about her
doctrine.
jd
From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure it does David. They always have a waiting
list so are pretty strict about
attendance and they will drop ppl who miss too many
meetings. When I had to go
to Australia I coul
Looks like neither of you have read the prophets,
or books in the Bible such as Lamentations where God's
own ppl are literally "judged by fire" Yes He is
merciful and longsuffering but even God haslimits; also we
are to adjust to His understanding gentlemen since we
are the ones in need ofa
f sin before you get to them is
clearly lost afterwards.You, my dear, are the new Judyizer
!!
jd
From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like neither of you have read the
prophets, or books in the Bible such as Lamentations where
God's
own ppl are literally &qu
Are you looking for a fortune teller
Lance?
My guess would be that some are inhabited by religious
spirits rather than the Holy One and that
doctrines of men have blinded their eyes while giving
them a false peace which tells them that walking
in God's ways and striving to enter the narrow
.Amen Dean,
JD I figure you were thinkingofProverbs
11:14b when you wrote what you say below ie: "in the multitude of
counsellors there is safety" However the
"counsellors" referred to in Proverbs ARE those of God's Word or
the Biblical text as you call it. Theyall
say the same thing by the
O DIFFERENCE !!
I have a different definition of grace than you do
JD. For me it is not a cloak for sin - it is the ability through
the power of the cross to overcome sin. Grace
gives us the power to do as we should and to love the unlovely..
--
Original me
ONLY when they consistently walk in the light as He is
in the light ..
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:32:34 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[*in JCsjudgement, hisbrethren bothalready do
have] will have happiness beyond
understanding
-- On Sun, 12 Feb 2006
Lance, the problem it appears is with your
definition of "believer"
As to the assumption below - I for one would say YES.
Believers have certain
fruit in their lives and it is not the kind you
describe here.
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David:
Am I to assume that YOU would be
From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]I don't
think you are hearing us properly David. WE/I am saying thatChrist did not
appear in our heathren state-He appeared in the state we areafter salvation
not before salvation. As a born again believer I have fleshand blood I can
choose to sin-but
-- From: "Taylor"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I invite you to read again Peter's sermon in
Acts 2.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
C
From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]I don't
think you are hearing us properly David. WE/I am saying thatChrist did not
appear in our heathren state-He appeared in the state we areafter salvation
not before salvation. As a born again believer I have fleshand blood I can
choose to sin-but
It's not and what's more you can be "as you say"
assumed and still be unhealed. Every worldly person is
not headed for heaven Megohmrod or whoever you
are. Nothing is written in the flesh of your heart that you don't
accept and embrace ie: Love Him and do what he
says - which of course
How very deceiving ...
No, Jesus is the covenant and we get in on it if
invited ...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:19:45 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd: Typical Augustinian
response by way of Calvin.I readhim as saying: Why should one fear God
because we are in the
You major on the minors Bill because this is of
paramount importance to your flesh and blood gospel
However, yours is not the Kingdom He came to declare
and fleshwill neverglory in God's presence.
"For ye see your calling brethren, how that not many
wise men after the flesh, not many
ters.
1. 'Flesh and blood gospel'. 2. The 'Kingdom He came to declare.' Amen to the
former and, we ARE participating in the latter. Even if by mistake Judy,
thanks!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Bill writes:
It is rebellion to deny the physical lineage of Christ. He is the second Adam precisely because he is of Adam's
blood: through Eve to Seth, and Noah, and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and
Judah, and David to Jesus throughMary. To deny this is
to deny that Christ came in the flesh
Bill you have a Greek gospel because your faith rests
in Gk words .. I wonder, are allGreeks saved??
Jesus Christ is who His Own Word says he is whether or
not orthodoxy agrees and whether you see it or not. Right nowyou are
attempting to validate the pronouncements oforthodoxy which is the
wer over sin. Jesus came to do good and to heal
all who are oppressed by the devil, for God was with him. Funny wording
that - you would think the apostle would have said "for he was fully man and
fully God".
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Tay
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:49
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] The spirit of
anti-christ
Bill writes:
It is rebellion to deny the physical lineage of Christ. He is
e so negligent about the sperm of
David and the incarnation?
Because he was not addressing heretics.
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:32:56 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
His death was the victory not His
life.
with the Seed having a spiritual element,
Judy, but that is not the issue, is it? Do you deny that Jesus' "flesh
body"is of the genetic material of Abraham and David?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@
What subject is that?
I don't see anything written here by G so I am not sure
what subject you are on.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:35:07 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And may I ask you why you are so bent on changing the
subject?
From: Judy Taylor
I
dy. Do you believe the same?
From: Judy Taylor
He does not have a human father Bill; he was
fathered by the Holy Spirit and the family he was born into is
that
of Abraham/David. Why are you so adamant
about what you can not possibly know. He was born h
ng of the
Messiah. It is a shame
that you make Him to be something less than what He and the scriptures
claim !!!
jd
--
Original message ------ From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No; my belief is that Jesus was fathered in the
womb
other!!!).Her church leadership and those at BSF would escort her
to the door if they knew she wasteaching such error.A
real shame.
jd
--
Original message ------ From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You major on the minors Bill because this
jd
Making Him unnecessary?? I don't know what is
going on in your head JD but itdefinitely has nothing to
do with anything I am speaking of.. and a carnal
bloodline has nothing to do with anything. The blood of
the eternal covenant is where it is at.
't mean blood.
Flesh(as in theflesh of Christ) doesn't mean
flesh. Son of God doesn'tmean He isDeity.
Son of Man doesn't meanhe is Man. And how do we know
all this? Judy Taylor !! She is the one (and the
only one) who makes the necessary connections in scripture and presents us the
&qu
JD writes:
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is ,
ontologically speaking, and what one does?
I do. That "he was made to be like us in every respect" is
a statement of the essence of His being.
He can not possibly be same as us in the
don't have
an answer?The text says "for God was WITH him".
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:34:14 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Why was
he so negligent about the sperm of David and the incarnation?
Because he was not addressing heretics.
BillFrom: Judy Taylor
On Sun, 29 J
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:25:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, Dean, I have been
repeating myself --and thisbecause neither of you have adequately
addressed my concerns; instead, you are always wont to change the
subject.Moreover, I have not seen much yet to suggest
Atonement for starters. By the way, thanks for being honest. This should
clarify any confusion Dean may have had about being in agreement with you in
regards to Christ being a geneticdescendent of David et al.
Bill
---From: Judy Taylor
No; my belief is that Jesus wa
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:07:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That does not surprise me.
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a
challenge against Jesus' humanity.
That heresy sprang up later. John addresses
it.
No
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:00:07 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Original message -- From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD writes:
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one
The Col passage for
what it tells us about the mission of Christ; the Gal passage for making
it clear just exactly where our blesssings lie (within Christ).
Anyway -- thanks to those who offered a contribution.
jd
--
Original message --
ns to contest her point of
view. She is a woman and, peer to many who don't like what she is
doing. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 28, 2006 11:51 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free
Speech Are you intimating
I don't think so Lance; I see you as the one with the
eye problems. You come
across on TT as one
withoverweening pride but the reality is that you are someone
with very low self
esteem. You appear to haveassurance but it is not the
assurance
that comes through abiding in Him and having
Hmmm - I'd be interested to go back two thousand years
- wonder how John the
Baptist or even Jesus Himself would fare in your
economy Lance? Ask yourself
what it is in you that seeks to malign God's servants
and take a strong stand in
favor of the enemies of all
righteousness?
On Sun,
It's not Dean who needs to do the rethinking
Bill:
"Likeness means just what it says ie: resemblance
orsimilitude"
A zircon is not a diamond - it is a "likeness", it
resembles one.
Jesus was made in the likeness of men (see Phil 2:7,
Romans 8:3)
From: "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Dean wrote:
Real cute Lance, about on par with the "dancing
trinity"
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:10:33 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Preach this at the University of Florida, Super
Bowl and Mardis Gras, David. New signs/t-shirts "THE ZIRCON
JESUS&
Amen!
Now this is good doctrine. Thank you Dean, what a
blessing you are in the Lord...
From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]No, I
think I will stay the course Bill. The Law mentioned was only weakin our
flesh not Christ's flesh-He came in the "likeness of that flesh" butthe law
worked in
Lance, one thing I have learned about you is that
you do not pay attention, your
pre conceived ideas rule in your own mind. I have
said over, and over, and over
and over that I do not consign ppl anywhere. This
is not my call to make and so
far as I am concerned as long as there is physical
business. Imagine: a Judy who isn't alwayscausing trouble. Heck, you
might even be likable. As it were, though, you will prove once againyour
denial.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@ma
: Fw: [TruthTalk]
Was Jesus of God's Nature?
- Original Message -
From: Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 27, 2006 08:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's
Natu
ill prove once againyour denial.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:11
day. Some of us jump into the debate. Others watch with morbid
curiosity. Most simply ignore the fuss. Very few are convinced.
From: Judy Taylor
Imagination run amock Lance .. You have
seen things that are not there, they are constructs
of your own imagination.
On Sa
e out the gospel. Can YOU not see
that also?
From: Judy Taylor
Once more Lance you put what you are about on to
me. You might be surprised to learn that I spend little or
no time psychoanalyzing any of you. The
difference between all of you and DM is that most o
words .. I wouldn't call
them "life anecdotes". When you say "seer" are you thinking like "witch
of Endor?" Where is this gift
inNew Covenant economy?
From: Judy Taylor
Very hard to tell Lance because noone you mention
ie G, BT, DS etc.
nion ... including my own because these are not the ones that count ie:
"Beware when all men speak well
of you"
From: Judy Taylor
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:07:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Even the 'exalted one' had a 'revela
I, for one am apalled by the Reprimand sent to
Christine Miller by the University of
Florida - My how far we have fallen. Where is the
freedom of speech we are promised
and why is it OK to promote every perversion publicly
on this Campus but God's Truth is
ridiculed and maligned?
I find it
ce Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Be wise as serpents, harmless as doves. This
would appear NOT to describe Christine.
If she climbs in the ring then, she'd best be
prepared for combat.
From: Judy Taylor
I, for one am apalled by the Reprimand sent to
Chri
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:20:20 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Dean. I hope you will accept my apologies for
any misunderstanding: I am not wishing that you would stop contributing, but
that you would stop jumping so quickly to conclusions. It
is insulting to me --
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:11
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:20:20 -07
believe that this is anywhere promised
in the Scriptures themselves.
It is not only promised it is demonstrated in the
life of the apostle Paul himself who may have read lots of
books before he fell down before the Lord on the
Damascus Road but from all accounts he certainly did not
afterwards.
hough, you will prove once againyour
denial.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 6:11
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
f us 'read' Judy similarly. IFO actually
believe that Judy can't imagine why the 4 of us 'read' her as we do. The
acerbic tone employed, IMO, is apparent to all save Judy.
From: Judy Taylor
Bill, opinions are like noses - everybody has
one If yours isn't very pleasant
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:31:47 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes No one
in this discussion believes that Christ sinned, Dean.
cd responds
Respectfully- If one states that Christ had a fallen nature
sinful naturethat is what one is saying John.
No,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:31:47 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes No one
in this discussion believes that Christ sinned, Dean.
cd responds
Respectfully- If one states that Christ had a fallen nature
sinful naturethat is what one is saying John.
No,
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote: ... I am not a dualist.There is only one
nature.
Just for the record in regards to this discussion, it is
dualism that provides for me the framework for understanding how
Jesus could have a fallen nature. Without the understanding of man's
d's Nature?
(*, below,= 'therefore, JC wasn't a human
being' which is rational, but not biblical;a sylogisticlie
rather than) myth
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:00:03 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[a.]So far as humanity is
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy wrote: A sin nature and a "fallen nature are one and
the same" So far as humanity is concerned - There is none righteous, no
not one.
"There is none righteous, no not one" refers to sinful actions, not to a
sinful nature residing in the flesh. The
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:03:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When one employs a text in order to address a
concern or, to make a point then, ONE HAS A DOCTRINE, JUDY.
- Original Message -----
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:32:45 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I agree with Debbie's analysis of the difficulty experienced by
Judy. In addition, I think Judy's attachment to her thinking
concerning the "generational curse" is a huge problem as well.
Not for me JD; the
s:
Most of your 'wisdom', as you call it, Judy,
comes fromyour fertile imagination.Should you choose to equate
that (your imagination) with God, I can sort of live with that.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
Hallelujah!!
Thank you Dean. Maybe now we can make
some headway; you are right on the mark.
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:57:01 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd: John I read your letter but if you want a reply could you
please condense your points-In the form it is inI don't
"not eat" nor would
they have violated that command. jd
AE were created innocent; they did not know sin
until they decided to
disobey - that's all it took. This may conflict
with your doctrine but that's
just how it is.
- Original Message
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:48:48 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd: Very well thought out Bill and very well
articulated in your below reply. I agree with it andI realize by saying
thisit would appear as I am back and forth but one must realize that
this debate seems
of sin by having him
born of a virgin woman.
Imagine that???
--
Original message -- From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No I most certainly don't Dean; those are Bill's
words and Bill's concepts. Not mine. What I believe is
--
Original message -- From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No I most certainly don't Dean; those are
Bill's words and Bill's concepts. Not mine. What I believe
is that
he was not born by procreation
allow you, given your 'teaching' on TT to teach in their
respective churches.No Judy, I'm not worried. Most would have sufficient
discernment to see this.
From: Judy Taylor
Are you worried Lance?
Don't you think God can take care of His
Word? Should we replicate the here
Now where didthat profound thought came
from?
What about faith in God by way of the Church
Fathers? What is that?
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:31:36 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Either faith in Christ is faith in God or, it is
idolatry.
So Lance where do you get your anointing as
"chief appraiser?" It's one that is not listed in all the
NT
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:35:24 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, hereafter nicknamed 'Jesus', shall
nonetheless be subject to the same appraisa
Note #10
Four distinct grounds may be noticed in the Chapter for the humiliation
of Jesus: it became God there was His glory; the destruction of Satan's
power; reconciliation or really propitiation by His death; and capacity for
sympathy in priesthood.
- Original Mess
#10
Four distinct grounds may be noticed in the Chapter for the
humiliation of Jesus: it became God there was His glory; the
destruction of Satan's power; reconciliation or really propitiation by
His death; and capacity for
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote: If God was concerned enough about sin to
cursehis creation at the start then why would he send a Redeemer
who is under the curse to take careof things? Does not even make
common sense.
1 Corinthians 1:18-19(18) For the preaching of the cross
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy wrote: I am amazed that anyone reading
Church history would want to hold the early fathers in such
honor and follow their example. With their politics,
heresy hunting, banishing those who didn't agree with them etc.
Where is the love? and faith
No I most certainly don't Dean; those are Bill's words
and Bill's concepts. Not mine. What I believe is that
he was not born by procreation like
the rest of us since he had no human father. Mary may
have
contributed an ovum butthe male determines
achild's gender and his spiritual
ill. Why is it impossible
to disagree with you
without your becoming
extremely upset?
I get the distinct impression that you
hate me. Bill
This is a wrong impression
and needs to be cast down.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
an and wholly divine simultaneously then, he is a Mormon
Jesus?
From: Judy Taylor
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a problem with
that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus is neithe
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a problem with
that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus is neither unambiguously human with our
humanity nor unambiguously God with God's divinity. This would make Jesus some
'third thing'. (Arianism)
006 10:15:07 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NO!
From: Judy Taylor
Isn't this a form of what the Mormon Church teaches
Lance?
Theirs is a flesh religion and theyhave
noproblems with purity and holiness
Same with the so called "C
on
Judy's behalf) that the statement in caps is NOT the Mormon position. It is,
in reality, the position held by believing Christians for some 2,000
years.
From: Judy Taylor
They do, their stance is that man is progressing
toward godhood as they do
e with you.
You stand alone.
jd
--
Original message ------ From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a problem with
that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lan
Mormon Jesus. You are equating Lance's teaching with Mormonism AND
THE ASSOCIATED BIAS THAT EXISTS ON THIS FORUM. You are simply
trying to win the argument with the use of such language. Words mean something. We should mean what we say and
actually say what we mean. jd
From:
J
14:43:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My but it does become difficult at times, Judy,
believing that you don't know what you're doing when you write like
this.
From: Judy Taylor
I'm speaking of one aspect ONLY JD and that is the
"exactl
ISTS ON THIS
FORUM. You are simply trying to win the argument with the use
of such language. Words mean
something. We should mean what we say and actually say what we
mean. jd
From:
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm
Yes I probably am Blaine. Sorry about that
and forgive me please.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:36:41 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 1/19/2006 8:13:01 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't this a form of what the Mormon Church teaches
ites:
So then, Judy, should Jesus' human nature
actually have been other than your 'reading' of
Scripture?
- Original Message -----
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January
Oh Lance, the apple doesn't fall too far from
the tree does it. You are a true child of the Orthodoxy you serve.
This anxiety about some ppl not
being able to handle scripture is what led to the "dark ages"
when it was chained to the pulpit because of fear. Have faith in
God.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:57:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The doctrine of Christ's personal preexistence as the second
person of the Trinity is taken for granted by most
orthodox Christians and has been since New Testament times. The effect
of its denial is a god
and, those
for whom he is overseer then, the CHRISTIAN GOSPEL IS NOT BEING PREACHED BY
ANY OF THEM. (I believe he/they/you probably preach some fear-based moralism)
.
From: Judy Taylor
Lance what is so hard about the plain facts
which are that
It is impossible to be &
-0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE SCRIPTURES, JUDY!! This
ought to be a matter of some concern for DM, whom I suspect knows this.
From: Judy Taylor
Oh Lance, the apple doesn't fall too far
from the tree does it. You are a
ny Jesus Christ come in the
flesh.
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:15:53 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is really sad
that Bill says I can't be saved unless I accept his kind of
orthodoxy.
No, Bill is
ce Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DM is, IMO, intentionally elusive. At times he
appears almost duplicitous, saying one thing to one person (you)then
appearing to contradict that thing through what he says to another (Bill
Taylor).
From: Judy Taylor
I believe them ra
theology less...
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:53:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your doctrines, Judy, along with some of DM's ARE
the doctrines of (wo)men.
From: Judy Taylor
Your fears are wrong Lance and you need to
replace them with the fa
301 - 400 of 4567 matches
Mail list logo
