Hi!
I am using spamassassin with amavis.
I sometimes get mails (Spam Mails) - not tagged with ***SPAM***
but tagged with the following header:
No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none]
What does tests=[none] mean?
lg
Martin
Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the
variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
//
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the
variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
Hi,
Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about scores it s in 50_scores.cf
BUT it's
I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a
email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so
looked at how it had been scored and noticed that the rule USER_IN_WHITELIST
had been hit with a -100.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:35 +0200,
ok - not the same problem I have
is -100 too high for you ?
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I noticed a
email this morning that had scored -94. I do not know the sender domain, so
looked at how it had been scored and noticed that
It wouldn't be if we had any user whitelists set up ! Thats the problem. This
is a vanilla installation and we have no individual user preferences setup.
All is controlled by a single account, as the mail is then passed onto a Notes
server. I have looked at that rule and can see that it uses
Jerry,
I understand they're not true virus files, but the default value of
0.1 is way low and was causing them to be passed on to users. It
seems the SA rules to catch these should be in the standard set.
Release notes suggest a set of SA rules to match these.
Although high scores can be
Hello,
I just got finished the install from here:
http://www.flakshack.com/anti-spam/wiki/index.php . When i start amavis in
debug mode and it runs through its check I get the following error:
###
May 14 21:29:21 MARTINI.happynetworks.net
Resolved :) Thanks.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok - not the same problem I have
is -100 too high for you ?
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I
noticed a email this morning that had
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Hi!
I am using spamassassin with amavis.
I sometimes get mails (Spam Mails) - not tagged with ***SPAM***
but tagged with the following header:
No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none]
What does tests=[none] mean?
That's generated by amavis,
ip guy wrote:
Hi all
Anyone know why see X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? in the
email header after delivery and spam scanning ?
My local.cf http://local.cf file looks like this
required_score 8.0
report_safe 1
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
Do you use spamc? Was the
Hi!
Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail
as spam?
(I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin)
lg
martin
No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none]
What does tests=[none] mean?
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's generated by amavis, not spamassassin.
My guess, based on my limited knowledge of amavis, is that message means
one of the following:
Amavis did run the message through SA, but
Actually the [none] comes directly from SpamAssassin, amavisd just
reports what it gets after calling SA.
The relevant code is in SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm, sub _get_tag:
TESTSSCORES = sub {
my $arg = (shift || ,);
my $line = '';
foreach my $test (sort
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none]
What does tests=[none] mean?
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's generated by amavis, not spamassassin.
My guess, based on my limited knowledge of amavis, is that message means
one of the following:
Martin Hochreiter schrieb:
Hi!
Hello!
Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail
as spam?
perhaps the default is recommended?
(I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin)
I think that ... strongly depends.
e.g.:
What rules you use, which
Some messages here get tests=none. The two conditions I've found here
are 1) like Matt already mentioned, a timeout in communication using
spamc, or 2) the message was received totally within our network
(trusted/internal).
Perhaps maybe you don't have the trusted/internal networks set up
Is there a standard perl version that the SA team aspires to
and uses as a baseline or some sort?
If so, is it the 5.8.8 or newer or ???
For running on Windows, 5.8.8 is highly recommended. 5.6.1 can work, but
it is rather unstable. Can't really comment on what runs best for other
Someone mentioned issues with config files in
/etc/mail/spamassassin in regards to the newer 3.2.0
I understand what you mentioned about what should be in .pre
files and .cf files
Did you find any other issues with just general alternatively
named .cf files or problems with them?
It's
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:14:24AM -0500, Gabriel Millerd wrote:
Beyond the s/3.1.20/v3.2.0/ issue that some people cannot get past.
I have the same issue. I had to juggle my cf/pre files entries for
quite some time to get past the check_scan problem you describe for
spamd to run peachy.
On May 15, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Release notes suggest a set of SA rules to match these.
ok, I put the maps back to 0.1 and put those rules in local.cf
I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the
RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not
had any success.
I have the IP::Country::Fast
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IP/Country
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IP/Country.pm
It's just a way to order the loading as I understand. .pre files are all
read and processed before any .cf files. It insures that any plugins can
be loaded and initialized prior to any rules that use the plugins.
Bret
Thank you
- rh
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
Hello All,
I would like to ask for help ;)
I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second
server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin
so score which SA get from this (conenct to powerfull server to get
score) will be added to score from relay server.
Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to ask for help ;)
I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second
server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin
so score which SA get from this (conenct to powerfull server to get
score) will be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
###
May 14 21:29:21 MARTINI.happynetworks.net /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[23697]:
(!!)TROUBLE in pre_loop_hook: check: no loaded plugin implements
'check_main': cannot scan! at
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from
where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your
v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions).
Daryl
Thanks Daryl,
Here is the output and the config file is being read where i edited
Hello JamesDR,
Tuesday, May 15, 2007, 7:08:53 PM, you wrote:
Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to ask for help ;)
I have relay server which is overloaded already and I have second
server which is powerfull. I want to use spamc -d ... used as plugin
so score which SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from
where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your
v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions).
Daryl
Thanks Daryl,
Here is the output and the config file is
Hello,
I Solved the problem by adding following rule in my local.cf file
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
regards
Patrick Slokker
--
Hello,
After a Spamassassin update from 3.1.5 to
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:08PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the output and the config file is being read where i edited and
expect. Any ideas from the output?
[...]
[28524] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/v320.pre
[...]
[28524] dbg: plugin: loading
Run 'spamassassin -D --lint' to make sure SA is loading your config from
where you think it should be. For whatever reason it's not reading your
v320.pre file (probably due to location or permissions).
Daryl
Thanks Daryl,
Here is the output and the config file is being read where i
Hi all,
I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-)
I can see that this forum is an excellent source of
useful information with some very helpful members, but
am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising
the emails coming in from the forum.
Been using message boards and forums
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0200, Chris wrote:
How do the others here do it please ?
Use the List-Id header (it's actually the standard way to filter lists in
general).
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Any fool can criticize and complain - and most do.
pgpHXi1SzGKn7.pgp
Description: PGP
Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-)
I can see that this forum is an excellent source of
useful information with some very helpful members, but
am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising
the emails coming in from the forum.
Been using
Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-)
I can see that this forum is an excellent source of
useful information with some very helpful members, but
am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising
the emails coming in from the forum.
Been using message
Big Wave Dave wrote:
I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the
RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not
had any success.
However, the header is never added.
In init.pre, I have individually tried each:
add_header all Relay _RELAYCOUNTRY_
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:54:24PM +0200, Chris wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this board, so please go easy on me ;-)
I can see that this forum is an excellent source of
useful information with some very helpful members, but
am having a bit of a problem at my end, with organising
the emails
Now run
amavisd -d config debug-sa
Amavisd-new may disagree on where it looks for SA stuff.
Gary V
Thanks all for the help .. Here is the output to Gary's suggeston .. Seems
all the same .. Again thank you everyone.
# amavisd -d config debug-sa
ps: pid: No such file or directory
Pid_file
On its own SA appears to be working. I'd check to make sure that
whatever user amavisd runs as (or at least starts as) can read your
config files. If that looks good and it still doesn't work I'd check
with the folks on the amavisd list.
Daryl
BTW the permissions for the spamassassin
At 10:54 AM 5/15/2007, Chris wrote:
How do the others here do it please ?
I filter on List-Id: users.spamassassin.apache.org
I hate these lists where I have to remember to hit REPLY-ALL instead
of REPLY, I often wind up having to go send a message again. The
only thing worse is one list
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Some messages here get tests=none. The two conditions I've found here
are 1) like Matt already mentioned, a timeout in communication using
spamc, or 2) the message was received totally within our network
(trusted/internal).
Perhaps maybe you don't have the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now run
amavisd -d config debug-sa
Amavisd-new may disagree on where it looks for SA stuff.
Gary V
Thanks all for the help .. Here is the output to Gary's suggeston .. Seems
all the same .. Again thank you everyone.
# amavisd -d config debug-sa
ps: pid: No such
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the
RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not
had any success.
However, the header is never added.
In init.pre, I have
# amavisd -d config debug-sa
ps: pid: No such file or directory
Pid_file /var/amavisd/amavisd.pid already exists. Overwriting!
[13583] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.
[13583] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre
files
[13583] dbg: config: read file
# amavisd -d config debug-sa
ps: pid: No such file or directory
Pid_file /var/amavisd/amavisd.pid already exists. Overwriting!
[13583] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.
[13583] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre
files
[13583] dbg: config: read file
Ah, running amavisd-new chrooted, yes?
Gary V
Yes Sir!
I had copy all files over but I guess some way some how that 320 file
didnt copy over.
Now to sort through the rest of the setup and get it to start filtering :)
Thanks!
Hi everyone,
I'm seeing by the output of message analysis time that some messages must be
hanging up SA;
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 2019
Number of spams : 1108 ( 54.88%)
Number of clean messages: 911 ( 45.12%)
Average
How are you calling SA? procmail? Amavis? plugins? Which version are
you running? Most likely, the RBL checks are the reason for that
delays. Try setting
skip_rbl_checks 1
in the local.cf, then look over the statistics again. If scan times go
down, blame your nameserver...
Luix!
2007/5/15,
Big Wave Dave wrote:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the
RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not
had any success.
However, the header is never added.
In
Ok I was able to track them and found that they are timing out after about 5
mins- spamd is timing them out- I'm assuming its large messages that it is
timing out on- what rule/acl would I need and WHERE would I enter it to
tell SA to ignore or not to scan anything over 1 meg.
Running
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
I am running SA 3.1.8, and I'm having issues implementing the
RelayCountry plugin. I followed the Wiki/PerlDoc page, but have not
had
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as well?
Thanks for your assistance.
Either would probably do, might as well use a real message. Sending to
the list is fine.
Daryl
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as well?
Thanks for your assistance.
Either would probably do, might as well use a real message. Sending to
the list is
Big Wave Dave wrote the following on 5/15/2007 12:54 PM -0800:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as well?
Thanks for your assistance.
Either would
Big Wave Dave wrote:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as well?
Thanks for your assistance.
Either would probably do, might as well use a real message.
On 5/15/07, Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote the following on 5/15/2007 12:54 PM -0800:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
On 5/15/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big Wave Dave wrote:
Do you want to see the full debug with --lint or a real message?
Should I send it to the list as well?
Thanks for your assistance.
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Ok I was able to track them and found that they are timing out after about 5
mins- spamd is timing them out- I'm assuming its large messages that it is
timing out on- what rule/acl would I need and WHERE would I enter it to
tell SA to ignore or not to scan anything
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout,
my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing
---
trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX
trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX
internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24
internal_networks
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
Hi!
Is there something like a recommended tag level when to treat a mail
as spam?
(I actually use 1.7 as tag level for amavis/spamassassin)
5.0 is the recommended default. This level will tune SA to treat false
positives (nonspam tagged as spam) as roughly 100
Matt Kettler wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout,
my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing
---
trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX
trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX
internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24
Hello,
The following package for my company mail-gateway:
Centos 4.4
spamassassin-3.2.0-1.el4.rf
clamd-0.90.2-1.el4.rf
MailScanner-perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-5
postfix-2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2
I was checked the maillog that always show the following message:
May 16 10:29:01 mailgateway MailScanner[7437]:
leiw wrote:
Hello,
The following package for my company mail-gateway:
Centos 4.4
spamassassin-3.2.0-1.el4.rf
clamd-0.90.2-1.el4.rf
MailScanner-perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-5
postfix-2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2
I was checked the maillog that always show the following message:
May 16 10:29:01 mailgateway
Matt Kettler wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I get now hints from the logfiles concerning a timeout,
my trusted/internal networks in local.cf are set as follwing
---
trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX
trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX
Maybe i wasn't clear. i guess it was the way i asked.
Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner
for spam
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
My setup currently uses spamc v2.40 on hostA to forward to spamd v3.1.8 on
hostB
My local.cf on hostB is setup
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:45:54PM +1000, ip guy wrote:
Anyone know why I'd keep seeing this in the mail herders of email scanner
for spam
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
Whatever you have calling SA is adding markup. SA won't ever put in question
marks. My guess is that it's
Daryl C. W. O'Shea schrieb:
---
trusted_networks 80.123.XXX.XXX
trusted_networks 80.122.XXX.XXX
internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24
internal_networks 192.168.2.0/24
internal_networks 127.0.0.1
---
I am using the SuSE rpm spamassassin-3.1.8-9.2
68 matches
Mail list logo
