I think its unlikely that semiconductors are inside.
At the september demo the temperature was 120° and if 3 cores are in opereation
I would expect more.
A single case of overheating would damage the system and Rossi claims a maximum
temp of abaout 450°.
Also all these gamma and possibly neutron
Ok a good call. No micros inside. When Rossi's tech was getting ready to
open the module, he wipes away a lot of white powder that was sitting on
top of the top metal plate. Do you think the powder might have been
powered Boric Acid placed all around the E-Cat as a neutron shield?
AG
On
Small world. One of the reasearchers mentioned was a friend of my
sister's, the other was my thesis supervisor, and I did my M.Elec thesis in
the building to the left in the pic. I won a solar powered car race in
that car park. All looks to have survived the earthquake quite well.
On 10
I cannot say this. I dont even know wether the powder came from the inside or
outside.
Posiibly it comes from leaked and evaporated water?
Rossi claimed 120° overheated steam @ air pressure. Thats a litle bit strange.
If he used salty water with elevated boiling point, this could explain it.
I
The white powder was between what looks like 2 sheets of lead directly
on the top of the top pate of the reactor box. Start watching from 11:00
minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-5cFOsisAofeature=player_embedded#!
AG
On 11/10/2011 6:57 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I cannot say
He's hosted here: http://stayhosted.com/, I expect they suspend if the site
exceeds it's traffic volume.
I've had my company site disappear from a hosting service because we exceed
there CPU cap in a 2 minute interval. No warning, just wiped from their
hosting service. It took a while to find a
Ha, how ironic, stay hosted can't keep his site up!
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.comwrote:
He's hosted here: http://stayhosted.com/, I expect they suspend if the
site exceeds it's traffic volume.
I've had my company site disappear from a hosting service
This is a paper from the next issue of Informavore's Sunday:
How Scientific Fraud Is Like Ponzi Finance:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/11/how-scientific-fraud-is-like-ponzi-finance/2478
85/
A good idea, however I think nuanced thinking has to be applied. A financial
criminal
On 11-11-10 03:15 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Ok a good call. No micros inside. When Rossi's tech was getting ready
to open the module, he wipes away a lot of white powder that was
sitting on top of the top metal plate. Do you think the powder might
have been powered Boric Acid placed all
The white powder was between 2 sheets of lead that were on the top of
the top plate of the outer reactor box. Start watching from 11:00
minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-5cFOsisAofeature=player_embedded#
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-5cFOsisAofeature=player_embedded#!
AG
On
Rossi has already exposed it by injecting the high frequencies. Any power
meter used to check this would likely be subject to the same inaccuracy. I
suggest a simple frquency meter with a lead touched to the dpf.
- Original Message -
From: Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
To:
In a thread that has become unwieldy, Jeff Sutton wrote:
But the only way to think that his process makes any business-first
approach is that he has still something to hide. It could be he is
missing something to do with control of the reaction, or he has no
new art for his patent; someone
AG, I do not remember exactly where Rossi made the statement that the cores
were now flat and planar or rectangular in shape. Seems like it was a question
I asked him on his blog. I had suggested that he use this form factor many
months ago because it had scaling advantages, but at the
Good points. History is littered with examples of this type
of tragedy unfolding. Maybe before this chapter is finished and lost, our
hero will change the plot, avoid ruin, and we will all live happily ever
after.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
In a
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Higgins%20Oct%206%2027kWreactorDiagram4.png
I deleted the #3 version of this diagram.
- Jed
Nice diagram but, how do you know there are the bottom an top lead layers ?
Under the radiator nobody could inspect in.
I'd replace the lead label with a question mark.
2011/11/10 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
See:
Please note how far from the heat exchanger the Tin probe has been placed.
Why didn't he place it closer like the Tout one ?
2011/11/10 Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com
Nice diagram but, how do you know there are the bottom an top lead layers ?
Under the radiator nobody could
In Rossis age I too would not want a Nobel price.
Its not very much you get and for this you must travel around in the
world, give boring interviews and so on.
Better get some millions and become old in happiness and peace stay
healthy and play piano, or tennis ;-)
Am 10.11.2011 15:42,
Oh I think he craves attention and recognition. Thus his web site and the
time he spends answering questionsor at least responding to them. (And
I hope this works out and he gets a nobel prize, attention, money and
tennis. I guess I am an optimist but verify :)
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at
At 08:38 PM 11/9/2011, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
I also suggest as he said the 1 MW demo was only running on 1 core
per module, he has a was to activate and deactivate the internal
cores as desired.
Rossi said (someone reported?) that they started the 1MW with a
full load of hydrogen, but it
Need a break from Rossi madness? Slow slide into crazy? Do you know about
the Mental illness happy hour?
Well those guys have learned that co-mingling wry humor (or rye humor, if
after 5) with pathological science is a good place to start. To that end,
here is an unauthorized episode.
Start
Mats Lewan told me that the cylinder was not attached to the gas inlet
(it just looked that way in some photos) and its purpose was a radiation
sensor (probably a gamma scintillator). Mats said the frequency device
was behind the eCat - so I keep looking for glimpses of it in the
videos.
Jones,
Is this paving the way to a new kind of doping in sports? To be seen at
next Olympic Games! ;-)
mic
Il giorno 10/nov/2011 17:54, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net ha scritto:
Need a break from Rossi madness? Slow slide into crazy? Do you know about
the Mental illness happy hour?
Well
On 11-11-10 10:34 AM, Andrea Selva wrote:
Please note how far from the heat exchanger the Tin probe has been placed.
Why didn't he place it closer like the Tout one ?
This should be obvious, I would think, and doesn't seem especially
strange. You want the Tin probe relatively far from the
At 07:16 AM 11/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See
http://lenr-canr.org/RossiData/Higgins%20Oct%206%2027kWreactorDiagram4.png
a) Why no bottom heat exchanger fins?
Rossi said a long time ago that the Gamma thermalization was partly in
the lead shielding. In the original tubular ecats the lead
The more I consider Horace’s model of a scam ECAT device, the more I warm up to
the idea. We are all aware of the fact that any excess energy produced by the
core modules will propagate toward the water coolant and result in higher
temperature and increased output power.
If there is no
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Start with a provocative science story, not quite pathological yet - and
take it from there...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45230351/ns/technology_and_science-science/
Not to mention a provocative picture with a
Andrea Rossi
November 10th, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Dear Wladimir Guglinski:
So far we are manufacturing 1 MW plants, and our next 2 years capacity of
production has been already saturated. For the small units we need at
least 1-2 years for the approvals.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi
Potassium doping in the Olympics? … well, “Special K” humor aside, it’s
remotely possible.
Not sure what sports would benefit from a slight mental advantage, but now that
they have badminton and ping-pong, who knows what is next? I never thought that
“doping” would be such a big issue in
Either his customers are convinced or he is playing a very complex
game. There are applications for raw heat in winter
that might be worth putting up with leaky gaskets to get. His
interactions with the public on his blog are getting shorter,
and more like: please go away, I'm very busy.
Blog
Is this credible to anyone? If so, why and how?
Rossi can't rely on anyone else at all to help make the wondrous
machines? If he's afraid of reverse engineering, he'd better not sell any
at all! How does he know what his customers will do with them? Or maybe
he's relying on that
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this credible to anyone? If so, why and how?
Welcome to Vortex, MY!
T
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Potassium doping in the Olympics? … well, “Special K” humor aside, it’s
remotely possible.
I'd believe anything after learning a caterpillar fungus helped set
Olympic records:
In the older small (but allegedly powerful) E-cats, the main (largest and
probably most powerful) heater has always heated the cooling water! This
is evident because it's wrapped around the *exterior* of the E-cat. This
never made sense, by the way, unless the objective was to use electricity
Welcome to Vortex, MY!
Thank you.
At 10:12 AM 11/10/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:
Hi MY ... you're all over the web !!!
In the older small (but allegedly powerful) E-cats, the main
(largest and probably most powerful) heater has always heated the
cooling water! This is evident because it's wrapped around the
*exterior* of the
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
. . . much less what was in the ones that were contained in his megawatt
plant.
You need not put things in quotation marks every time. We know that you do
not believe this.
If the secret is only in the catalyst sauce, I don't understand why Rossi
I originally surmised heat exchanger fins on the bottom, but several
vorts insisted that there is no evidence for heat fins on the bottom and
that the reactor cell is bolted to the bottom (but I didn't show bolts).
So I removed the fins on the bottom.
Your comment about the internal water flow
Energy is primarly the stuff of dreams, and dreams are not limited by
the laws of nature.
Harry
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Need a break from Rossi madness? Slow slide into crazy? Do you know about
the Mental illness happy hour?
Well those guys
Am 10.11.2011 17:43, schrieb Jeff Sutton:
Oh I think he craves attention and recognition. Thus his web site and
the time he spends answering questionsor at least responding to them.
You can see from his answers, he does not crave for recognition of
others. His answers are absolutely
At 10:28 AM 11/10/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
I presume when you say hot input you are referring to the top T
fitting that is the water/steam outlet. Where is the evidence that
it IS 3 bar? Have you identified the part used? The operating
steam temperatures are more consistent with
Even if he's concerned about that, he could disassemble all the way to
the final core and stop there.
He did that, several times. Even with the big reactor people say they
could see the whole thing, under the cell. You can't see much in the
photos, but you can in person. It would be a
Am 10.11.2011 20:23, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Even if he's concerned about that, he could disassemble all
the way to the final core and stop there.
He did that, several times. Even with the big reactor people say
they could see the whole thing, under the cell. You can't
At 11:23 AM 11/10/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:
Are there better images of the interior that maybe I missed? Or a
written report from a first person experience I can read
somewhere? I am skeptical that anyone really got a good look at
fine interior details and, in this day of tiny easily handled
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/nasa-engineer-explains-why-rossi-demos-failed/
According to a slide presentation given by NASA engineer Michael A.
Nelson, which New Energy Times obtained under a FOIA request, “Energy
Catalyzer” inventor Andrea Rossi failed to conclusively show that his
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
He ran out of money and couldn't pay Bologna. If he really collected E2M he
should be able to pay them soon. If so, it will show up on their official
site.
Using Windows, you can make the Euro symbol by holding down the alt
I generously considered that the insulation value was R6 in my analysis (an
input in the spreadsheet), but much of that insulation may have been lost when
the water leaked into the insulation. If you presume R6, and calculate the
outside area of the eCat, the calculation of the heat loss is
And most of all, it seems to be a serious problem for Rossi to get an
E-cat to one of the two universities he promised them too. I wish Rossi's
butt were somehow a bit more resistant to pain.
He ran out of money and couldn't pay Bologna. If he really collected E2M he
should be able to pay
That sounds about right! SCAM!
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/nasa-engineer-explains-why-rossi-demos-failed/
According to a slide presentation given by NASA engineer Michael A.
Nelson, which New Energy Times obtained under a FOIA request, “Energy
Any idea if anyone has received the entire NASA LENR presentation? I've been
checking their website
(http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/sensors/PhySen/research.htm) for some time, and it
looked promising:
Tests conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center in 1989 and elsewhere
consistently showed
That is quite a hit at Rossi's claims, since NASA believes that chemical
reactions could not be ruled out.
But it's interesting that they didn't point out other problems, such vapor
problems and energy COP. The question is: they just didn't bother trying to
figure that out because it was an
My interpretation of his motive is that even with his secret discovery the
underlying mechanism still remains a mystery. This is reflected in his journal
of physics which gathers ideas and comments from around the world and also his
arrangement with the University of Bologna, He seems a man who
I do not know about this hypothesis, but it is well-established that the
human brain takes enormous amounts of energy, and this has had a major
impact on human evolution. Having a large brain is a tremendous burden.
That is probably why there are few other highly intelligent species. During
the
2011/11/10 Higgins Bob-CBH003 bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com:
Mats Lewan put his hand on the top foil over
the insulation and said that he thought it was about 60C. That information
might be useful to back onto a better guess at insulation value, but it will
not be as simple as presuming
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi can't rely on anyone else at all to help make the wondrous
machines? If he's afraid of reverse engineering, he'd better not sell any
at all! How does he know what his customers will do with them?
I believe he thinks it is easy to keep track of a
Am 10.11.2011 21:00, schrieb Roarty, Francis X:
His progress is putting unbelievable pressure on all the other researchers to
stake their claims. Recent gains by Miley and Piantelli make it clear this race
isn't over
Yes, Piantelli's attorney says Rossi is using his patents and Rossi
works
I wrote:
Any cold fusion cathode work harder will self-destruct to some extent
merely by being exposed to air . . .
That was supposed to say, any cold fusion cathode or powder will
self-destruct . . .
They all self-destruct over time from internal contamination. The powder
stops working
I have always felt that the internal heater of the old cats was the main one.
Rossi has always used misdirection and apparently Mary fell for it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 1:30 pm
Subject: Re:
Bob, I think you have generated an excellent diagram. It is highly unlikely
that the 3 core modules are actually in series. That would be very difficult
to control and Rossi has a pretty poor controller as far as I have seen.
This would not be his first statement that is intended to
It should be noted, that Rossi has shown them (NASA) more evidency than
they got from Piantelli.
And if they really had success with own experiments in sustained
reactions, then it is not understandable why they need Piantelli Rossi.
Do they possibly play a secret service type
On 11-11-10 03:41 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
It should be noted, that Rossi has shown them (NASA) more evidency
than they got from Piantelli.
And if they really had success with own experiments in sustained
reactions, then it is not understandable why they need Piantelli Rossi.
It's not at
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Therefore Horaces analysis is not only wrong, but it is utterly
against the normal thermodynamics and cannot explain anything.
I agree, and so do all of the scientists I have asked outside of this forum.
Because it does not consider at all normal thermodynamical
For the 1MW demo Rossi wrote explicitely in his forum, the reactors
where in parallel.
So far I remember, he gave differing statements for the other demos.
One should understand, it is not important for Rossi to give precise
information.
He gives unclear information by purpose. It is not his
However calorimatric criticism is not relevant, because Rossi has
never forbid for observers to do accurate calorimetry and check all
the necessary calibrations with their own instruments. Therefore bad
calorimetry is not likely source for the cheat, because that cheat
would depend on
I think the effort of disassembly of the internal cell is being grossly
under-estimated by those wishing for/expecting a viewing of the guts.
In Rossi's big eCat, the cover seal was leaking water at 15 psi of
pressure (maybe less). The cell is far more difficult to seal. Inside
is initially ~150
It is not reasonable to draw the conclusion that NASA believes that a chemical
process might be used within Rossi's device. They are merely pointing out that
it would take a very long time to absolutely rule out that possibility.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Santos
It is
irrational to demand 1,000 times more energy than chemistry can produce when
you have already seen 10 times more. The point is already proven.
I think many responsible and capable people don't believe that. The
only absolutely determinative test is an independent one that rules
out
At 11:49 AM 11/10/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Using Windows, you can make the Euro symbol by holding down the alt
key and pressing 0128 on the numerical keyboard.
The Euro's going away so soon that I don't need
to
At 11:41 AM 11/10/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/nasa-engineer-explains-why-rossi-demos-failed/
At the Sept. 22, 2011 LENR Workshop at NASA Glenn Research Center,
Nelson explained that
Rossi would need to run [his experiment] for eight hours or more with
a
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
However calorimatric criticism is not relevant, because Rossi has
never forbid for observers to do accurate calorimetry and check all
the necessary calibrations with their own instruments.
I do not know who wrote that, but it is incorrect. Rossi does
Am 10.11.2011 21:55, schrieb David Roberson:
It is not reasonable to draw the conclusion that NASA believes that a
chemical process might be used within Rossi's device. They are merely
pointing out that it would take a very long time to absolutely rule
out that possibility.
One must
On 11-11-10 03:58 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 11:49 AM 11/10/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Using Windows, you can make the Euro symbol by holding down the alt
key and pressing 0128 on the numerical keyboard.
€
The Euro's
I may be incorrect, but I suspect that Rossi has never conducted a long term
experiment in public because he does not have a controller that functions well.
Everything that has been observed during the public demonstrations has been
manually controlled. The self sustaining mode is merely a
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/11/10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Rossi does not usually let people use their own instruments. He has on
some occasions.
- Jed
He doesn't even want people to bring their own.
/snip/
Heffner is saying that since the flow rate may not be 60 L in 4 hours it might
be zero. That is preposterous.
/snip/
Because the flow rate was not at its max (it was sped up during quenching) and
it decreases with back pressure (as demonstrated in the September test), we
have no idea
Mary Yugo wrote:
It is
irrational to demand 1,000 times more energy than chemistry can produce when
you have already seen 10 times more. The point is already proven.
I think many responsible and capable people don't believe that. The
only absolutely determinative test is an independent one
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
The entire empty volume of a shipping container? Since the energy
produced is N * the number of modules, the TIME should be the SAME as
a single eCat at the same power.
Well said.
Eh? I'm getting not to trust those NASA engineers. Are you sure they
didn't mix
Jed, are you sure that Horace assumes that there is no water flowing through
the ECAT? That would be totally unbelievable. Maybe I was assuming that he
was seeking the truth, but if he is neglecting such important issues, then I
have been mistaken.
Horace, you need to defend against these
Andrea Selva wrote:
Rossi does not usually let people use their own instruments. He has on
some occasions.
- Jed
He doesn't even want people to bring their own. Jed, does this ring
you any bell ?
He would not let me bring instruments, which is why I did not go.
However, I have talked to
Why did Krivit only release one slide? What did the others slides say?
I requested a nasa FOIA request for the all of the slides. But if
anyone knows Michael Larsen's and can request the slides, that might
be faster.
- Brad
Wait a moment before making this statement. I recall Mats Lewan bringing his
amp meter to the test. Am I mistaken?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Selva andreagiuseppe.se...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 4:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor
On 11-11-10 04:15 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
It is
irrational to demand 1,000 times more energy than chemistry can
produce when
you have already seen 10 times more. The point is already proven.
I think many responsible and capable people don't believe that. The
only
Robert Leguillon wrote:
/snip/
Heffner is saying that since the flow rate may not be 60 L in 4 hours it
might be zero. That is preposterous.
/snip/
Because the flow rate was not at its max (it was sped up during quenching) and
it decreases with back pressure (as demonstrated in the September
David Roberson wrote:
Jed, are you sure that Horace assumes that there is no water flowing
through the ECAT? That would be totally unbelievable.
I believe he said that previously. Actually I think he said something
like we do not know what the flow rate is so it might be zero.
Ask him.
Maybe I'd overlooked this, when did they measure and film the outpouring water?
I thought that it was twice during the entire demo - once while it was running,
and once during quenching, no?
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Leguillon wrote:
/snip/
Heffner is saying that
Sterling Allan: Arm-in-Arm with Andrea Rossi
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/sterling-allan-arm-in-arm-with-andrea-rossi/
and others
The Big Lie Technique of Scammers, Courtesy of Adolf Hitler
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'd overlooked this, when did they measure and film the outpouring
water?
Yes, many people saw the water and bubbles moving through the hose.
FURTHERMORE, we know with certainty that there was steam or hot water
coming out of the
On 11-11-10 04:32 PM, ecat builder wrote:
Why did Krivit only release one slide?
Personally I wouldn't trust Krivit as far as I could throw Rossi.
My immediate jump-to suspicion is that he released exactly as much as
would support his case, and nothing more.
What did the others
Hi,
On 10-11-2011 20:59, Dusty wrote:
That sounds about right! SCAM!
While cleaning up my SPAM folder I stumbled across the following email
of a month ago.
It seems that spammers have found Rossi as a way to earn money as well.
Kind regards,
MoB
==
Return-Path: @unicredit.org
I wrote:
Something had to be coming out of the reactor the entire time. It had to be
coming out at a flow rate large enough to deliver lots of heat to those
thermocouples.
We also know from Lewan's log that he measured the flow rate at the time
when the flow rate was lowest. He measured 0.9
Rossi Source for Fox and MSNBC: Obama Teleported to Mars
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/rossis-source-for-fox-and-msnbc-says-obama-teleported-to-mars/
I am beginning to like Krivit; that one was pretty funny.
And he had the brains and initiative to make the FOIA request to
NASA.
-
On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Dusty wrote:
That sounds about right! SCAM!
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/nasa-engineer-explains-why-rossi-demos-failed/
According to a slide presentation given by NASA engineer Michael A.
Nelson, which New
The lady (Krivit:) doth protest too much, methinks to quote
Shakespeareor maybe he was a fraud too?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
Rossi Source for Fox and MSNBC: Obama Teleported to Mars
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
- Nelson's comments just put the cap on what has been asked so often: why
does Rossi's six-month-between-charges e-cat never self-sustain long enough
to eliminate the possibility of the heat
coming from a chemical reaction?
Here is a similar loaded
One of the reasons that Rossi may not wish to run a very long test is
that I suspect that HE is the control mechanism. When it is run in
self-sustaining mode, after some period it will need to be briefly
reheated to stabilize the mode. If it was not in self-sustaining mode,
then it may be in
Here is Rossi together with Adolf Schneider:
http://peswiki.com/images/d/d9/Schneiders-Rossi-Meeting-Foto-280711_300.jpg
For those who dont know Schneider, he is a switzer engineer and a
competent magnet motor expert in german spoken countries.
He has an own german magazine NET Journal where he
Bob wrote One of the reasons that Rossi may not wish to run a very long test is
that I suspect that HE is the control mechanism.
Agreed. I think all logic points to this.
I suspect some of the complicated claims to how Rossi is scamming
people are beginning to rivalcold fusion itself.
Regarding Rossi, there are obviously many answered questions that
remain that could either scientifically verify or refute his
extraordinary claims.
I don't know whether Rossi is a SCAM artist or whether he is the real
deal. Let me repeat that: I DON'T KNOW!!! Granted, I have my
suspicions... I
Higgins Bob-CBH003 bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
One of the reasons that Rossi may not wish to run a very long test is that
I suspect that HE is the control mechanism. When it is run
in self-sustaining mode, after some period it will need to be
briefly reheated to stabilize the
At 02:48 PM 11/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Here is a similar loaded question:
Q: Why does Obama refuse to show his birth certificate?
A: He did show his birth certificate. This question incorporates a falsehood.
I finally have convergence between my OTHER Conspiracy Theory
(with hard-coded
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
