Eric, you bring up an interesting point.
What is science anyway?
I guess it could mean different things to different people.
For some it might be about certain rules, the status quo, a belief system,
a hierarchy, certain methods and prejudices, and dogma not unlike a
religion.
Not something
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:29 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
But it might be scientific, if scientific does not mean logical and
truthful.
But when I say scientific, I mean logical and truthful.
What science is is something that smart people have spent their entire
careers
That image should work at any zoom level? I'm using a 24 inches
LCD monitor.
Mark Jordan
On 19-Apr-13 21:35, John Berry wrote:
Mark, I have made a new one especially for you.
Now this image deals heavily with colour so it may not work if your
monitor or videocard is at fault.
That image should work at any zoom level? I'm using a 24 inches LCD
monitor.
It should (provided it is scaled in a straightforward pixelized manner),
but if you can try it on a different monitor, Jones reported that one gave
stronger apparent results than another, it may be due to a vivid
Here is a typical attack on cold fusion. This is not newsworthy. I just
wanted to point out that things like this are still widely published. As
usual, the author has not done his homework.
http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=238052780327676025
- Jed
Oullette joined in the attack:
https://plus.google.com/105473622219622697310/posts/KdbdV5yAmRT
- Jed
My guess is that these professors do not exist. I find it hard to believe
they have cut off all contact with Rossi, or he has cut off contact with
them. As I said, he tends to micromanage things.
Perhaps he made this up, or it is a garbled version of reality. Perhaps 11
professors expressed
From: Jed Rothwell
My guess is that these professors do not exist. I find it
hard to believe they have cut off all contact with Rossi, or he has cut off
contact with them. As I said, he tends to micromanage thingsPerhaps he
made this up, or it is a garbled
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
An article on the Swedish blog site Osunt is reported on E-Cat World about
the rumor that there has actually been new testing going on at the Svedberg
Laboratory at Uppsala University in Sweden...
Interesting. Do you think it is true?
I am not
I think the more suitable analogy is to Heart of Darkness. We are Marlow,
and Rossi is Kurtz.
Eric
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel a bit like Adm. Nagumo in the middle of the Battle of Midway. He was
deluged with intelligence sightings of the
Its not that complicated. Jed suggested the appropriate control for
placebo: No treatment at all.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:20 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is obviously a complex issue.
But I think that strong belief as with hypnosis and other suggestions
can't be
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the more suitable analogy is to Heart of Darkness. We are Marlow,
and Rossi is Kurtz.
That works too.
What I find mystifying about Rossi and Russ George alike is that they do
not need to exaggerate. They have both made important contributions.
The scrambled She has posted on
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2013/04/20/physics-week-in-review-april-20-2013/
On 4/20/13 6:57 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Oullette joined in the attack:
https://plus.google.com/105473622219622697310/posts/KdbdV5yAmRT
- Jed
--
http://boingboing.net/2013/04/18/what-happens-when-you-wring-ou.html
For hand towels, astronauts get those little vacuum-packed pucks that
you kind of have to unravel into a towel. But what happens when you
actually put the towels to use?
Two Nova Scotia high school students, Kendra Lemke and
James brings up important points with respect to hypnosis and the mind/body
relationship. No treatment controls have been performed in many
studies--most often through the use of wait list controls. In other
words, one group is on a waiting list to begin the treatment, and this is
compared to
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a typical attack on cold fusion. This is not newsworthy. I just
wanted to point out that things like this are still widely published. As
usual, the author has not done his homework.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
That is, an effect in which a prognosis improves because the patients think
they are being treated when they are actually taking by fake medicine
(something with no
LOL
From: Ruby
The scrambled She
NASA has screwed up bad. They have embraced both the Widom-Larsen (W-L)
theory and polaritons in the same framework. They are incompatible.
In the NASA LENR patent as follows:
“A method for producing heavy electrons is based on a material system that
includes an electrically-conductive material
Here is his follow up paper in response to comments on his first paper.
In the eye of the beholder: Reply to Wilson and Shadish (2006) and Radin,
Nelson, Dobyns, and Houtkooper (2006)
http://crystalchannelers.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/new-science-the-widom-larsen-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-lenr-theory/
WL has gone with Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) electrons. This is a
mistake,they cannot do this because of the lack of energy density in the
SPP, IMHO.
The WL theory must
21 matches
Mail list logo
