James,
The narrow gradient is necessary but IMHO it is the passage thru this
gradient that is asymetrical to the reaction and provides the opportunity for
anomalous heat such that room temp examples like Arrata with Pd were very small
because the transitions were very slow / slow
8O
I'm shocked how fast claims, which make specialist laugh, goes to the media,
while we struggle since 24 year for making evident calorimetry, tritium
measurement, be accepted...
that two weight tow measure story make me sad about the rationality of our
civilisation.
maybe is it simply
ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
With LENR we can economically and cleanly remove CO2 from the atmosphere
the same way nature sequesters it in CaCO3 and such, not a problem
Yes. Also, as I suggested in my book, we can use desalination and indoor
farms to increase woodlands and convert
Hell, it might be easier just to make water, like nature does...transmute
it after we are done with it...desalination might be old school
On Friday, July 26, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'cheme...@gmail.com'); wrote:
With LENR we can
It's astounding to consider the ways in which the world is going to change. No
one can help but be inspired who has any imagination. I remember becoming
aware, quite independently, of the inevitability of warming in the 80s, and for
some time ran around like Roast Chicken Little warning about
With the recent corresponding findings of both Defkalion and MFMP
suggesting the temperature needs to be 179C to initiate the reaction, I am
wondering if this may also have implications for electrolysis with nickel.
Obviously, it would be difficult to run electrolysis at a power level high
enough
This one reminds me of a roach:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=ntlI-pDUxPE
Kill it!
sounds like the Les Case system I have now. Tube in a tube. It can get messy
(and costly- fluid costs) if you develop leak somewhere.
When I was running it, I needed to run at a bout 60ml/ min to keep the delta T
DOWN. The problem is if you have the delta T too high the properties of the
oil
notice you only need the 179 figure to get above the Debye temp. You can get
around that by alloying the Ni with Cu and even annealing.
http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Debye_Temperature_and_Hardness_of_Co.html?id=Rhd5NwAACAAJ
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
With the recent corresponding findings of both Defkalion and MFMP
suggesting the temperature needs to be 179C to initiate the reaction, I am
wondering if this may also have implications for electrolysis with nickel.
From: Jack Cole
1) Brillouin Energy's method of electrolysis would seem likely to elevate
the cathode temperature 179C. Could this be a factor in Godes' success?
It is looking like there is nothing there with Brillouin. Months ago, they
received a very large grant for testing at SRI.
It is a strong field. But it falls fast, specially if the magnetized object
is tiny:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet
2013/7/26 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
That kind of field at 20 cm from the device (their claim) would be
pulling tools from across the room.
** **
Also, this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet_toys
2013/7/26 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
It is a strong field. But it falls fast, specially if the magnetized
object is tiny:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet
2013/7/26 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
the magnetic field from a dipole falls of as the inverse cube of the distance.
it falls off quickly. I am not sure what it would be outside a mu metal
shielded device, but I would expect not much would be available for tools
across the room.
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:45:17 -0300
They meant Tesla. But what is the big deal with this?
These are dipoles. The magnetic force falls falls like ~1/r^3 at best with
the distance.
Each of these spheres have ~1T. Both structures are close. They are pretty
still at a close distance:
Here is some complementary information. This abstract says the Debye
temperature is higher when defects are present.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pssa.2210090108/abstract
harry
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:14 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
notice you only need the 179
the B field of an orbiting 1s electron about a H nucleus is about 12T at the
nucleus.
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:46:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion/MFMP implications for electrolysis?
From: cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Jones,
Where was that claim made?
did they mean uT?
Because of the above limitations of passive shielding, an alternative used
with static or low-frequency fields is active shielding; using a field
created by electromagnets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet to
cancel out the ambient field within a
Jones,
Where was that claim made?
did they mean uT?
Stewart
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Jack Cole
** **
1) Brillouin Energy's method of electrolysis would seem likely to elevate
the cathode temperature 179C. Could this be a
for my lower temp demo, I now will be using mixed Ni+ Cu + Au alloy (reduced
from a mixed solution held in C mesopores). I am not sure what it's final
Debye temp is, but I expect it is much less than 0C.
D2
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:52:38 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion/MFMP
I did not notice external coils.
My cells often sing at a few hundred hertz (around 400) and at tens of MHz.
I was never sure if it was the reaction itself or just ringing of the
components.
Letts's empirical model has the reaction rates proceeding via the Lamor
frequency rates
at the
Author heat a hydrogen tube by RF and tube begin to glow he claim
transmutation of hydrogen to helium happen in tube I'm curious if he
put nickle powder , potassium and Fe2O3 in tube what would happened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C95uhXSGqG4
Author claim :This video shows the change of
If being above the Debye temperature is one of the preconditions for excess
heat, then Pd systems don't need an application of heat if they are done at
room temperature (20C), since the Debye temperature of Pd is several
degrees lower than room temperature.
Harry
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:47
From: DJ Cravens
notice you only need the 179 figure to get above the Debye temp. You can
get around that by alloying the Ni with Cu and even annealing.
Dennis,
Are you using something akin to Celani's constantan alloy? Or else Monel?
Jones
Pd reactions possible at lower temps than Ni --yes, exactly.
However the reduction of the energy of vacancy of formation is also a good
thing. Cu in Ni, Au or Ag in Pd, Sn in Ti,.
My understanding (as limited as it is) is that you need the phonon capability
for the heat to leave the
I am using a chemical reduction of a metal salt solution. The metals end up in
the pores of carbon mesopores. Average pore sizes are around 9nm. I use a
range of mixtures.
The Ni variations are good for higher temps and are cheaper. The Pd variations
cost a lot to make but seem to give a
I think that the Debye temp is useful, although I am not sure if it is the
acoustical or optical phonons that are actually involve. I have a better
feel for the optical phonon moderating the reaction ( as seen from the duel
laser stuff) than the acoustical phonon that seem to be more involved
Is it possible that the units used to describe the magnetic field were
incorrect? It is easy to have a slip of this sort and it would be a shame to
use that against them.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Jul
It would not be out of line to assume that there is no relationship to the
Debye temperature whatsoever. This might just be a guess on their part.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Jul 26, 2013 12:52 pm
Subject:
Stack a zillion of these guys up and you might get a significant field at a
distance. My take on this is that the size of the field needs to be clarified
as well as the magnitude if it is real. It is too early for us to determine
exactly what is occurring.
Dave
-Original
You can use these types of electromagnetics to cancel out a field within a
small region, but a lot depends upon the shape of the field you are attempting
to eliminate. I have seen Helmholtz coils used to balance out the earth's
field in experiments. In this case the incident field is almost
Dennis, do your experiments generally have pulses of currents hitting the
active material? It might be that the metal wires are given impulse like kicks
that cause them to ring at their resonant frequencies.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com
To:
Ruby Carat summarizes Kim at
http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-18-day-5-presentations-and-awards/
..
The Hyperion reactor contains a core of nickel metal foam. Heating the system
to 180 C – 849 C, the Hyperion is then triggered, after which the magnetic
field rose 0.6 to 1.6 Tesla.
Kim says,
My HV based systems are normally pulsed in the range of 0.1 to 400 Hz.
But even the old electrolysis system would give MHz signals. (bubbles)
D2
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion/MFMP implications for electrolysis?
From: dlrober...@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013
Harry, -6C is 21.2 F...below freezing.. perhaps this is why Pd research has
been so sluggish? Some small population of Arrata's Pd atoms get this cold and
be responsible for life after death reports? I don't know if anyone has ever
thought to cool the Pd under test. ...
Fran
From: H Veeder
From: DJ Cravens
the B field of an orbiting 1s electron about a H nucleus is about 12T at the
nucleus.
Yes - but since this field is cancelled by the other electron (which
completes the orbital shell) in the molecule, it is diamagnetic. But this
brings up an important point about a
Interesting that you pulse some of them at 400 Hz. That might explain the
occurrence of that frequency, but the MHz ones must be a different process.
Bubbles seem to be a little slower acting, but who knows?
I could imagine some form of reinforcement at RF frequencies which leads to a
yes, we tried to put in freqs into the electrolytic cells at the frequencies
they were transmitting. No real effect.You might want to look up Letts'
application of RF at
around 82Mhz which was calculated based on the nuclear flip of a D nebulous due
to the
B field of an orbiting e. I
Do you recall how large the signal was that you saw at the RF frequencies?
And, any idea of how tight the frequency emission band was?
Too bad the system did not respond well to outside RF drive. Of course, the
drive requirement might be too tight to achieve with your equipment.
If the
I was just using a freq. spectrum an. at the time. It just put the freq. in
bins. or gave a FFT of the signal.
I seem to recall that it had a 1/2 width of about 10 MHz
You might ask Letts. I think he spent some time looking at such things.
D2
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Jones,
f/h, hydrino AND relativistic hydrogen are all the same. I have always
supported this hypothesis as the most likely source of the energy if not the
primary source [relativistic/ZPE], or at very least the necessary bootstrap to
enable the nuclear path theories. As far as the large
This response mysteriously ended up going to Francis rather than vortex-l.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Secrets
To: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
How many Pd+D electrolysis
Another issue raises its head when you attempt to align a large number of
individual magnets together to achieve a large overall field. The individual
magnetic elements are subject to a strong magnetic force which attempts to
reverse their directions. The energy stored within the total field
In reply to DJ Cravens's message of Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:41:48 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
My mental model more easily sees the optical phonons pushing D's together then
it sees acoustical phonons doing that.
For D this may be appropriate, but it goes nowhere toward explaining H + Ni,
where the reaction
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:39:20 -0500:
Hi,
I think it's only important to be *above* the Debye temp. Perhaps even the
further above the better.
This response mysteriously ended up going to Francis rather than vortex-l.
-- Forwarded message --
In reply to David ledin's message of Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:07:29 +0430:
Hi,
Pity he didn't put a Geiger counter next to it.
Author heat a hydrogen tube by RF and tube begin to glow he claim
transmutation of hydrogen to helium happen in tube I'm curious if he
put nickle powder , potassium and
I reviewed the DGT demonstration and had a chance to give it a bit of serious
thought. One observation that I focused upon was the reading of the output
temperature during the hydrogen cycle. It is obvious that this reading
remained stuck at 100 C during a lot of time as the power output was
This is his current youtube channel:
Christopher Strevenshttp://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHGieZG_SlkXcYmZNIQpMWQ
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHGieZG_SlkXcYmZNIQpMWQ?feature=watch
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, David ledin mathematic.analy...@gmail.com
wrote:
Author heat a hydrogen
Signal to noise ratio is low with this guy. Quoting him from a Daily Mail
article:
Oh yes, I've seen a nuclear bomb, or a good copy of one. It was green,
about the size of an orange, with two levers - one to cock it, one to set
the timer.'
Using his new-found expertise, Chris carried out a
Can anyone come up with a way to prove that the water is not being totally
vaporized under the conditions that were demonstrated? So far I come up
empty. My best estimate is that the true power output is over 20 kilowatts
of heat which is significant. My only concern is the speed of vapor
James
Thanks for information i didn't know he is famous .
On 7/27/13, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Signal to noise ratio is low with this guy. Quoting him from a Daily Mail
article:
Oh yes, I've seen a nuclear bomb, or a good copy of one. It was green,
about the size of an
Here is some apparent signal from him:
I found evidence for radiation from my gm tube that showed a dose rate of
7.5 uSv/Hr.
http://www.chrissimages.co.uk/MyCrazyIdeas/Practical%20Suggestions/MyFusionReactor/index.htm
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:25 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a quote from him about cold fusion
The theory of cold fusion is that when hydrogen is adsorbed into
palladium metal the hydrogen atoms get mixed with the electron gas
in the metal so that the protons are able to pack close together so
that meson tunnelling occurred. This makes a
(Not for pathoskeptics, who I ignore, they bore me with their repetitive noise)
1. https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919 (Navy Patent)
2. http://www.google.com/patents/WO2013076378A2 Soinen's patent (In
particular pointing out the pyroelectric fusion)
3. http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913 (I point
You seem like a reasonable person - why not use your real name? Maybe I should
assume it really is Blaze.
---
I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
From: blaze spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
To:
I mean put it in context - 1922 - Today Einstein met with Blaze Spinnaker to
discuss the results of the solar eclipse experiment, which promises to
completely change man's understanding of space and time as physical things..
---
I write a little. I
Actually, this one too:
http://www.globalenergycorporation.net/Publications.aspx
Though it's a link to links, it's a good one to use for scientists who
like peer reviewed pubs.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:30 PM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
(Not for pathoskeptics, who I
According to Kiplinger's anonymous sources there have been advances in
desalination technology. This will help out parched coastal cities that need
additional supplies H2O. Next-generation water filtration equipment,
enhanced chlorination systems and other big breakthroughs are in the process
of
I read 195 watts input, up to 20 watts excess. Is that correct?
That's a little weak and seems subject to measurement error.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kitamura et al. have been working on gas loaded Pd and Ni for some time,
originally in a
From MFMP's facebook page.
Harry
---
We are very sorry for the hiatus in our communications - we have been
working in...credibly intensely to move this field forward on several
fronts - all we can say is that we think ICCF-18 was a watershed for this
emerging science with excellent new
Well, Blaze.
You have ignored this twice now once I brought up the fact that Impact
Factor looked meaningless. Yet you are posting on other threads, with the
outward appearance of one who is coming up to speed on LENR.
My first conclusion is that you are backtracking from your original
Very very exciting.
Hopefully they will publish a test protocol for review / scrutiny well
beforehand.
What are you talking about?
Let's recap in bullet point in case you're having a hard time reading:
- I don't think impact factor is meaningless and don't care if you
think it is.
- This is why I stated impact factor 15, which I said I was willing to honor.
- I am willing to bet someone at 20:1
DGT stole a page from Rossi's book on the Ni-H scientific side, now they're
stealing a page from his book on how to conduct business and promise
undisclosed future promises of independent university testing.
I think they were working with Rossi and decided for themselves that the
guy was too
From the moles:
1.
- dixiepnum http://www.moletrap.co.uk/forum/account.php?u=166
- 2 hours ago
quote
Ok Mary. It's time. I am a big suck for epistemology. I have been on
this forum since the steorn days and have enjoyed your company. At first, I
thought you were just
Steve,
I recently finished working on a design for a system in Perth. They all
tend to be energy hogs as you are pumping lots of water around and have
large pressure drops across membranes/filtration equipment and
evaporators, etc.
Really needs a large source of green energy to power
Stewart
In Dr. Y. E. Kim's ICCF-18 presentation he reported that at initiation of
the sparking drive, the external magnetic field was measured as 0.6
Tesla. [He did not say what the magnetic field was while cold or during
warm-up, but the implication was that there was little or no field.] When
excess
i tried to explain this very thing to blaze over on the above top secret forums
a little over a month ago and encouraged him to join this mailing list to hear
from some real experts in the field which is how he wound up here. i agree his
tune has changed incredibly from the beginning which is
+of+DGT%27s+Hyperion%22
Joe
Hugheshttp://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22Joe+Hughes%22
Fri,
26 Jul 2013 20:13:51
-0700http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20130726
i tried to explain this very thing to blaze over on the above top secret forums
Let's take this discussion off list.
***NO!! It is utterly relevant to how your assessment of this technology
evolved over just a couple of short weeks and some simple reading by you.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
What are you talking about?
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would not be out of line to assume that there is no relationship to the
Debye temperature whatsoever. This might just be a guess on their part.
That's exactly what I was thinking. The Debye temp might be important,
i tried to explain this very thing to blaze over on the above top secret
forums a little over a month ago and encouraged him to join this mailing
Joe, that's not me. I thought you were referring to something else
when you said above top secret forums. I didn't actually realize
there was a
Also note that the Curie temp for nickel is 357 C. I believe above that
temperature nickel would lose any permanent magnetism. So if there is a
strong field above that temperature, I assume it would be induced from
something going on with the reaction.
Eric
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:50 PM,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
What are you talking about?
Let's recap in bullet point in case you're having a hard time reading:
***In case you are having a hard time reading, I will answer each point.
But why have you ignored my posts so
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
My first inclination is to assume some form of superconductivity interacts
with the heat generation.
Superconductivity, at least of the two kinds we're familiar with, seems
like a stretch at these temperatures.
Eric
?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22blaze+spinnaker%22
Fri,
26 Jul 2013 20:40:51
-0700http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20130726
i tried to explain this very thing to blaze over on the above top secret
forums a little over a month ago and encouraged him to join
I wrote:
Also note that the Curie temp for nickel is 357 C. I believe above that
temperature nickel would lose any permanent magnetism. So if there is a
strong field above that temperature, I assume it would be induced from
something going on with the reaction.
Thinking a little more, I
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
With the recent corresponding findings of both Defkalion and MFMP
suggesting the temperature needs to be 179C to initiate the reaction, I am
wondering if this may also have implications for electrolysis with nickel.
This is a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
That's exactly what I was thinking. The Debye temp might be important, or
it might be a red herring.
I think it is important. The smallest lambda phonon equal to twice the
lattice repetition width is also the
- Take this off list. This is my last response on this thread. Enjoy
the last word.
- No. I don't have to convince you of anything. I believe Impact
Factor is valid and that's all that matters to me.
- Thomson Reuters is an accurate source of Impact Factors. Most
journals will give you their
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is important. The smallest lambda phonon equal to twice the
lattice repetition width is also the highest energy phonon.
When the lattice atoms are closest due to phonon oscillation, the Ni
electron cloud is
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:58 PM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Again, this is my last word on this.
2:1 it's not.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:58 PM, blaze spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Again, this is my last word on this.
2:1 it's not.
Hah! Ok, you're on. I bet you $10 2:1 I don't reply to whatever
Kevin posts
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:06 AM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:58 PM, blaze spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Again, this is my last word on this.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
When the lattice atoms are closest due to phonon oscillation, the Ni
electron cloud is at maximum distortion. With an abundance of H atoms in a
highly excited state, the nucleii of both atoms (Ni and H) have an
increased
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes -- I was thinking of something similar. (I'm still not convinced
about the Debye temp -- is this a resonant frequency?
Just like the air in a flute:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debye_model
Excellent point Eric. Rossi appears to operate his ECAT at much higher
temperatures than this while DGT was very close to it. I wonder if there is
significance to the difference?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:39 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Excellent point Eric. Rossi appears to operate his ECAT at much higher
temperatures than this while DGT was very close to it. I wonder if there
is significance to the difference?
Blow the flute harder than the
I realize that superconductivity of the normal type is not too likely, but the
relative magnitude of the currents required to generate the large magnetic
fields suggests that resistive losses would be extreme if normal resistance
values were present. That is the reason I am searching for a low
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:44 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I realize that superconductivity of the normal type is not too likely, but
the relative magnitude of the currents required to generate the large
magnetic fields suggests that resistive losses would be extreme if normal
It appears that the actual motion of the Ni and H atoms is still far smaller
than that required to breach the coulomb barrier. I would like to find that
thermal or sound alone is enough to lead to LENR, but it just does not seem to
be energetic enough.
On the other hand, vibrations in the
But, the energy content of that sound is so small compared to the coulomb
energy needed to fuse. There must be some kind of special trick that we are
missing.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Jul 27, 2013
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:55 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It appears that the actual motion of the Ni and H atoms is still far
smaller than that required to breach the coulomb barrier. I would like to
find that thermal or sound alone is enough to lead to LENR, but it just
does
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:55 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It just might be possible for sound waves alone to do the job.
It's not really sound. It's quantized heat energy. When you understand
that, you realize that spin up and spin down electrons can mate if only for
a
I agree, the B field understanding might crack the case. And, if there is some
form of transducer action connecting the B field to the current generating that
field, positive feedback is perhaps possible. As we all know, positive
feedback can amplify a signal to a great extent until a limit
Maybe so. So let's see if a large B field can dig a tunnel for us to use!
Hydrogen in the atomic form might be far more susceptible to the field than
molecular hydrogen. My bet is that the DGT device generates plenty of ionic
hydrogen that falls upon the metal. The protons can be directed
My recent way of thinking suggests that heat energy is just random sound. If
some way is found to direct the movements of the atoms in a coordinated manner,
then that would look very much like a sound wave passing through the medium. I
bet we could figure out how much the effective
97 matches
Mail list logo
