Re: [Vo]:The quest for everlasting power

Axil, I beg to differ a little. 1. Rossi spends a lot of time studying theory. It seems that the theory of how it works is difficult and it will take an inspired individual to crack it. Just throwing money at it may not help. 2. If Rossi comes out with a good device at the right price he will

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

Jones, Further to what you wrote, Rossi's stated plan is to win the commercial battle by selling first, selling it so cheaply it is not worth competing with the name brand. In order to do this he has to have a patent to protect against others stopping him through their patents. The court

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

Peter and Jones, Rossi has recently stated he is working on 64 more patents. I suspect this first patent was driven by the desire to get something patented. The US Patent Office is dead set against cold fusion and you probably noticed neither cold fusion nor LENR were mentioned, but rather

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

Rossi has talked about a Mouse to go with the E-Cat but we haven't seen one yet. I'm guessing this is probably a very small E-Cat that supplies heat in a controlled way to the main E-Cat. Strange how all my comments end up at the bottom of the list. This makes it difficult to follow the

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Jed, not to mention that Tokamaks produce tritium by the liter.

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

@David Roberson "I recall reading that it is going to be a challenge to generate all of the tritium required to fuel the Tokamak reactor itself. Has this problem been resolved? Is there going to be enough left over to become a proliferation issue?" ITER, if it ever gets going, should produce

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Axil "NRC nuclear inspections cost a lot, The reactor operators must give the NRC about 20 million a year for inspection." For Tokamaks too? It's Tokamaks that make tritium in bulk. Probably the greatest threat for proliferation there is.

Re: [Vo]:The Ahmed Mohamed case and distrust of experts

Jed, I would place the primary blame on the school. A technical school and no one there can tell the difference between a clock and a bomb? Really? All the teachers involved must really dumb if they couldn't tell there was no explosive present, even the non technical ones. I disagree that

[Vo]:coding error

Using Firefox, I'm again getting this message. Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.

Re: [Vo]:Beware all this Industrial Heat excitement

In a comment to a share holder, Woodford Equity wrote: "With regard to Industrial Heat, we were, and have been, very aware of the scepticism about this technology. We have undertaken a rigorous due diligence process that has taken two and half years." Due diligence has a well defined legal

[Vo]:[Vo}:Weak But Recurring Anomalous Signal

Apart from reporting the new E-Cat X is performing very well, Rossi highlights this discovery. Weak But Recurring Anomalous Signal Rivets Particle Physicists http://thewire.in/2015/09/07/weak-but-recurring-anomalous-signal-rivets-particle-physicists-10162/

[Vo]:coding error

I am getting this message following Blaze Spinnaker's second post and later ones "Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem."

RE: [Vo]:Rewriting the lede on cold fusion for wikipedia

I can't see most of the comments because I get a message that there is a coding error. Good luck getting Wiki to change their write up on cold fusion. I got banned from there for arguing with editor AndyTheGrump, who was obviously biased and wrong.

[Vo]: Media starting to notice LENR

Quite fair piece in the Huffington Post reviewing alternative energy, including Rossi, at length. PC about climate change of course, but that can't be helped. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-h-bailey/post_10010_b_8052326.html

[Vo]:LENR theory

I sent this information directly to Vortex but it never appeared. Now you can see it here. http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/10/06/louis-dechario-of-us-naval-sea-systems-command-navsea-on-replicating-pons-and-fleischmann/

[Vo]:clean low-cost USA energy in 35 years with only wind, water, and solar for all

Rich Murray, Global warming has been exaggerated. It has been warming about .5C per century since the Little Ice Age and satellite measurements show that global temperature has not risen for the last 18 years. It will rise briefly now as there is a strong El Nino. After that, no one knows,

Re: [Vo]:[OT]: Toward a More Scientifically Literate Public

I wrote this comment to the piece but I see it disappeared... Pity you used such a bad example for pathological science.LENR aka cold fusion is alive and well, so you are completely wrong about that. Industrial Heat LLC has built a commercial 1 MW LENR thermal plant that according to

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

Jed, I have had several direct working relationships with DOE and came away mightily unimpressed. They seem to be lacking expert knowledge and particularly lacking in common sense. Maybe they do have some bright people but I was not fortunate enough to meet them. Just consider their record

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

CB Sites wrote: "In regards to the physics of global warming, it's very real." Of course it's warming. The world has warmed 0.5C/century since the

RE: Re; [Vo]:Climate And Nuclear Energy

Ooops I used a semicolon instead of a colon. Sorry about that. My eyesight is not good. Chris, Have a look at Modular Moving Pebble Bed reactors. They are fail safe, neither large not particularly expensive. I read the Chinese were planning build units ~100 MW in factories and transport

Re; [Vo]:Climate And Nuclear Energy

Chris Zell, "Better hurry with LENR because climate change concern is being used to bring back nuclear power." If more traditional nuclear is safe and cheaper than LENR I would be all for it. We should have built a bunch of LFTRs 20 years ago. Even Modular Moving Pebble Bed reactors are not

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

Jed, I disagree with your repeated comments about the "experts" understanding global warming. I wrote "There is nothing unusual about the weather." If you follow the link you will see that is true.

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

Bob, Thank you for your comment. That is a good argument using tritium. Possibly Eric means another way for forming tritium that doesn't involve the Coulomb barrier. To use a nonsensical example because I can't think of a good one. Quarks disassembling and reassembling elsewhere else.

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

Jed wrote: "For most sources of energy that is true. The DoE does have top experts in coal, oil, and nuclear power and other conventional energy." I don't buy the argument that you can be specialized in conventional energy and dead ignorant about anything new. The staff are almost all PhDs,

[Vo]:Tri Alpha Energy web site

Tri Alpha Energy now has a web site. http://www.trialphaenergy.com/

[Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

RAR Energia have published some clearer images of the mechanism at the end of their web page. The design has some modifications but it is still not clear (to me) how it is supposed to work. It seems they have not given up. http://www.rarenergia.com.br/

RE: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

Well Jed, you have seen the last half dozen posts that show just how rotten climate science has become. You might conclude that climate science is not a "hard" science like physics but more like psychology where theory changes like fashions over time because hard facts are missing. It wasn't

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

Jed, I voted for you. This is what I wrote my local paper. I didn't mention LENR because they have published a number of my pieces on the subject already. Adrian To the Times. The Paris climate accord means little beyond others saying they agreed with President Obama's opinion. The

Re: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

The animated GIFs at http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Animated_Gifs_of_RAR_Energia_Gravity_Motor_Mechanism show how it is supposed to work. The weight on the left moves away from the pivot point on the down cycle, increasing the moment. The weight on the right side is supported for some

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

Bob Higgins, I think Jed is attempting to defend the indefensible. But you stated the Chinese pollution problem is due to CO2. It isn't. If it were just CO2 there would be no smog. CO2 levels would have to get a lot higher than that for people to even notice it.

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

Jeb, You wrote: "You should at least acknowledge that I am defending the opinions of experts. Educated people may disagree with experts but it goes to far to say this is "indefensible." You, for some reason, imagine you know better than these experts. Given the complexity of modern society and

[Vo]:coding error

I am again getting this message for the Vortex site. "Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem."

[Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

Jones, My secondhand understanding is that many of the weapons the media call H-bombs are really boosted fission weapons with a shell of uranium.

RE: [Vo]:[Vo] ehang 184 flying taxi

Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. Electric motors are quite reliable and it could possibly descend safely if one failed. It is light enough one could even fit a parachute I suppose. You're probably right it would be better to land on tarmac or concrete. I think vertical takeoff and landing is essential for

[Vo]:recent comment problem

I commented on "ehang 184 flying taxi " and left out the : after [Vo] However you now show my email address (not that I mind for Vortex users, but making it available to search bots) and the message does not appear directly in

RE: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

Jones, "Hmmm... anyone got a clue about what the small gadget is - which is mounted to the bottom rail, just to the right of the main weight - and is moved slightly one every revolution by an elbow of one of the cranks?" I'm guessing that it is intended to capture the momentum somehow. Just

[Vo]:Direct power from E-Cat X

Early days, but an interesting development. James Watt December 26th, 2015 at 5:59 AM Dr Andrea Rossi, Can you finally tell us if the E-Cat X is able to produce electricity directly? That would be a Christmas gift! Happy New Year, J. Watt Andrea Rossi December 26th, 2015 at 8:30 AM James

Re: [Vo]:Whopper of the Week

Jones, See my post below yours Direct power from E-Cat X for a hint of how electricity might be gathered. Rossi is careful not to claim too much as it is obviously early days. I don't know why you are quite so scathing in what

Re: [Vo]:Whopper of the Week

Bob Cook, There is no doubt about the meaning when the title of the post is Whopper of the Week. I wish Vortex didn't shuffle the order of the posts. My post about the third one originally.

Re: [Vo]:Whopper of the Week

Jones, You are wrong and libelous in saying Rossi was convicted of fraud. He was convicted of tax evasion. Considering how his feedstock was retroactively classified as hazardous, of course he was in financial distress. Will you admit you were TOTALLY wrong and apologize to those you have

Re: [Vo]:Blast from the past -

Jones, One of my favorites was RAR Energia's gravity motor. http://www.rarenergia.com.br/ After going quiet for more than a year they have posted a number of new diagrams in November. They didn't make me any wiser and I suspect if it really worked we would have seen a video of it running by

Re: [Vo]:Story on climate crisis would need some comments

Mats, I have commented as shown below. Global warming has been exaggerated. To understand why see: http://people.iarc.uaf.edu/~sakasofu/pdf/two_natural_components_recent_climate_change.pdf Note Fig 2b. There is nothing unusual about the weather. Hurricanes are at record lows.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Frank Znidarsic "The field of cold fusion does not need this." I don't know how you can say that when Rossi resurrected cold fusion from near death only about five years ago. As a result several

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

with sensible arguments. and had free choice how to do it. IH was paying half his salary. On 6/4/2016 2:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: AA. Don't be silly. I was saying that technically I could instrument

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

I don't recall that. Care to give an actual quote they felt that way at the BEGINNING? Press statements a year later don't hack it. On 6/4/2016 4:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: You keep on about IH's ex

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

I don't understand the first paragraph. What you wrote was: "As to the matter of the ERV and his report, this is ultimately a legal question rather than a technical question, given what we know of the absurd circumstances of the test. And my bets are on Jones Day with regard to any legal

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Looks like Jed sort of maybe believes in Clarke's Law. On 6/4/2016 4:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Axil Axil > wrote: A number of Russians, a number of Chinese, and Me356. I have been in close contact with the Russians and two of the Chinese.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

tances for the test? You know what the ERV did? On 6/4/2016 5:10 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:06 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Eric. There is not the faintest question that if Rossi had one tenth of wha

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

the dissipation. AA. That would be all that's need if it were true. You have no proof of that, that you are willing to share, and the report of the independent ERV disagrees with that. That is why the court case is necessary. On 6/4/2016 5:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.as

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

to apply anything other than a scientific standard to what he has claimed. And in that court he has repeatedly fallen short. Eric On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:14 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: We will see soon enough. I'm hoping tha

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Good point! But it is a 7 day demo On 6/4/2016 4:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote: He has a investor on line, since he is running a 10 day demo for them right now as we speak. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:54 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

What "atrocious behavior"? Or are you looking for an excuse to bring up ad hominems about his ancient legal troubles in Italy? On 6/4/2016 5:13 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:09 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>&g

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

0 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:29 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: The fact is academia examined Fleischmann and Pon's results and declared it pseudo science. DOE and the Patent Office still reject LENR.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

I KNOW the charged one should not be called guilty until after the trial. The question is, do you? On 6/4/2016 4:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:50 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Like Jed, you conclude he is

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

As I said, this is lawyer fodder. The Chief Justice once said "The law is an ass" so anything might happen. On 6/4/2016 1:34 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:16 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: It is

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Eric. If he has something, let him show that he does through rigorous testing. AA. Why the hell should he? He doesn't owe you anything and it is not in his interest to do prove it

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

. It was inevitable that Rossi and IH would part ways. Rossi has enough street cred now to find a subservient manufacturing partner/investor who Rossi can dominate. Rossi sees IH as a deadly competitor and will do his best to destroy them. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:28 PM, a.ashfield <a.as

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

So you don't have an answer to my question about why expert IH did not insist on proper instrumentation at the start. No. Complaining about it a year later, no matter how formally, does not hack it. On 6/4/2016 5:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Jed. Since all other methods showed no excess heat, it was necessary to measure the dissipation. AA. That would be all that's need if it were true. I think you mean if the o

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

For those that think I am blindly supporting Rossi, my position is as follows. I don't KNOW that Rossi has anything. No one outside his team does. I think it likely that he does because of what he has demonstrated and that others have reproduced to some extent. Also his E-Cats can get a

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

not the other way around. On 6/4/2016 4:46 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:50 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Eric. If he has something, let him show that he does through rigorous testing. AA. Why the he

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: As I said, this is lawyer fodder. The Chief Justice once said "The law is an ass" so anything might happen. Perhaps. But the larger point is that Rossi is not acting upon a realistic a

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

that it was not necessary to see how the heat was dissipated in order to measure the plant output. How many times does this have to be repeated? On 6/4/2016 3:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: We will see soon enough.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

If IH says something that may not be true either. On 6/4/2016 5:05 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Axil Axil > wrote: He has a investor on line, since he is running a 10 day demo for them right now as we speak. Where did you get this

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

/NewsAttachment/65eabae6-64a6-4d4f-b8d6-b5748e75f7c6/VCExperts-SEC%20Action%20Against%20Private%20Fund%20Adviser%20Highlights%20Importance%20of%20Proper%20Expense%20Apport.pdf http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1bb458ca-d6ad-44be-b9db-cd1eda4c0040 On 6/4/2016 5:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

I gather IH's response is more of a legal formality. Trying to dismiss the case so they can get it ruled on by a judge rather than a jury. My reading of the statement puts IH in a rather poor light. It's as if they set out to delay the 1 MW plant test on purpose because they just wanted the

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Not clear how you arrived at that conclusion. Another story is that IH never tried to find a customer and then blamed Rossi for starting late. Or maybe didn't get all the partners to sign the agreement with the modified test procedures so they could claim it was invalid? Of accepted

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

for it that is was improper. I need to see what was actually used before jumping to conclusions. To keep on stating that Rossi stopped them is a red herring. On 6/4/2016 9:51 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 6:10 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wr

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Ah. You're sure of it so that's case settled. Can I borrow your crystal ball sometime? On 6/4/2016 10:30 PM, H LV wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Jed Rothwell > wrote: H LV

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

. harry On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com <mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: My point to Jed earlier was why "expert" IH would allo

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Because it would have been crazy to run a test where the outcome was not known. Half the ERV's salary was paid by IH. If they found him incompetent they should have hired someone else. On 6/4/2016 10:48 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: H LV >

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed, it doesn't matter how many times you make the same charges. IH says one thing and Rossi another. Until there are actual facts to look at. like the instrumentation used and the results, it is not possible to know the truth. You talk about "the expert" but I believe you are talking about

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Jed, it doesn't matter how many times you make the same charges. IH says one thing and Rossi another. Until there are actual facts to look at. like the instrumentation used and

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

the customer's facility, in the interview with Mats Lewan. AA. What do you mean "no"? What you state was not in my sentence. On 6/5/2016 10:41 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:16 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>&g

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed, It is not clear to me what you are complaining about. This is an interview where Rossi gives rounded numbers off the top of his head. If the output temperature was 116C this is a good indication that the steam was superheated and not wet. On 6/5/2016 11:27 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

It was Eric not me that claimed that IH hadn't said it didn't work. I thought they had. On 6/5/2016 11:30 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: AA. Really? We don't know that IH are claiming it didn't work?

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

AT THE BEGINNING. You may know what the instrumentation was but you have not shared that info and I don't know what it was. If you know it, why not list it? On 6/4/2016 11:40 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: The only thing Rossi stopped the IH employee from doing was visit the customer's plant. Who told you that? That is not what I have heard. Stopping the visit would be bad enough, in any case.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Eric. You said "IH .. had one of their own people - later - complain about not being able to see the customer's plant." We don't really know this. What we know is what Rossi himself said, about Penon blocking the expert from seeing the facility. It is likely that what you say, that the

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: You on the other hand are certain you know all the answers based on information from IH. not from the independent ERV. No, my information is from Rossi (or perhaps the ERV). I know it came from R

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

:14 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:50 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Not clear how you arrived at that conclusion. I got that impression from observing Rossi's poor behavior over many years, and from observing wha

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

his claims. In hindsight, knowing Rossi, this is not a surprise. AA. Really? We don't know that IH are claiming it didn't work? You might let Jed know that. On 6/5/2016 10:52 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:56 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashf

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

to imagine an expert would choose instruments that couldn't do that well. On 6/5/2016 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Well I apologize for my assumption. If the only information you have is from Rossi

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Eric, I don't think IH hired the expert until after the test started. All seemed well between IH and Rossi when the test started. On 6/5/2016 3:22 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 2:16 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

for other countries. On 6/5/2016 12:05 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:22 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: When I said patents had not come up before, I meant with your comments. Contrary to your claim about

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed. I do not think it was 116 deg C. AA. What proof do you have that it is wrong? On 6/5/2016 12:08 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: It is not clear to me what you are complaining about. This is an int

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

My new hypothesis is that the expert that IH brought in (having little expertise themselves) was from academia and was a believer in Clarke's Law. As he couldn't disprove the ERV he was desperately looking around for some way to do that. Hence his insistence on visiting the customer's

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Eric's Law. Everything Rossi says is wrong. We all know more about LENR than he does. On 6/5/2016 1:10 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:38, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: Eric. Perhaps you have information that lets you know with certainty that Thomas

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

at the beginning we will have to wait for more facts. I remain optimistic that Rossi's current 7 day test of the QuarkX will open things up without a long delay. On 6/5/2016 2:03 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 11:27 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@veriz

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:31 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Well I apologize for my assumption.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

of money to the cancel the test then that implies IH considered Rossi's IP to be valuable at that time. Harry On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:41 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: Eric & Jed, Consider the time line Su

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Seeing that Cherokee have been having some problems, I wonder if the failure to pay Rossi $89 million is partly because they are short of ready money. Posted by ultrasure on https://www.lenr-forum.com 2 hours ago

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed. The test was rubbish. I.H. knew that all along. Anyone who walked into the room and looked at the choice of instruments and configuration would see that in a few minutes. You keep repeating this Jed, but you never provide any proof to back it up. Why didn't Cherokee take Rossi's offer

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

AA. I doubt you have seen the data in it. Jed. What basis do you have for doubting that? AA. Because you say you have not seen the report. On 6/6/2016 3:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote: AA. You ke

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

AA. You keep repeating this Jed, but you never provide any proof to back it up. Jed. And Rossi has never provided any proof of what he says. Why doesn't he publish the ERV report? AA. He's not the one claiming it is rubbish and wrong. He is taking IH to court to prove he's right. AA.

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Apparently the seven day test of the three QuarkX reactors for an unnamed potential partner/customer has been extended for another week. I take this as a good sign that the customer is still interested. Rossi also commented that the p/c was "optimistic" and the results during the test were

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Jed, You are certain you know the answers. I don't claim I do and think there are still many unknowns. I don't like ad hominem attacks you make on others such as Rossi and that is the only reason I have replied to you. On 6/6/2016 4:30 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.as

Re: [Vo]:Huge news - Apple creates Apple Energy - an energy subsidiary

Huge news? Give me a break. Solar is the most expensive way of generating power Apple products are usually the most expensive. I believe LENR will surface shortly On 6/9/2016 3:03 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: http://9to5mac.com/2016/06/09/apple-energy-company/ "Apple has just become an energy company,

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Ross's attorney has issued a public statement saying that the license between Leonardo Corp and Industrial Heat has been terminated due to IH's failure to make payment for it. http://ecat.com/news/pressrelease-industrial-heat-loses-license-for-rossis-e-cat

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the court case. From a quick scan it doesn’t look like they have stated the E-Cat doesn’t work, but complain about the delay in starting the 1 MWtest, the instrumentation used and complain about the old E-Cats on stand-by not

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >