Pretty much.  The whole sync thing is the problem.
On Apr 17, 2015 12:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> So two products do 2/3 of those products.  Augh!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The gigabit poe injectors do this, but without sync.  And with some
>> fusing and wiring issues.  This would add the sync and clean up wiring.
>> On Apr 17, 2015 8:37 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We need one product that does gig for Af5x, epmp and ubnt.  That would
>>> be glorious.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Apr 17, 2015 3:36 AM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In progress....  :)
>>>>
>>>> I was going to hold off announcing this until we were sure it was going
>>>> to work, since the 'mechanical issues' we're working through are a side
>>>> effect of this, and I'm confident but not 100% sure we're close to solving
>>>> them.  But since it was brought up I'll give a bit of a look behind the
>>>> curtain so to speak:
>>>>
>>>> At some point the light went on in my head that I could add a set of
>>>> jumpers to each port just like on the Gigabit PoE injectors and make the
>>>> syncinjectors radio-universal.  I struggled with how to make the jumpers
>>>> accessible until I realized that I could just get some more holes cut in
>>>> the bottom of the syncinjector case.   For the existing 4 port injectors,
>>>> this isn't a problem as those holes can be added to the side of the case
>>>> closest the circuit board and we can put the jumpers on the side of the
>>>> circuit board closest to the holes and everything would work fine.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the syncinjector currently in work is the 12 port
>>>> injector.   This adds an additional hurdle that there are two boards, each
>>>> with 12 ports.   Each board needs to be close to a side to make this work,
>>>> which means the orientation of the boards are flipped in relation to each
>>>> other (laying the unit on it's side, one is 'right side up' with the
>>>> connectors sitting on the circuit board, and the other board is upside down
>>>> with the connectors hanging from it (just like in the existing product)),
>>>> effectively placing the two boards themselves as far apart as possible in
>>>> the enclosure.  This isn't a problem except that the enclosure is two U
>>>> shaped pieces of plastic which the boards snap into one U and then the
>>>> second U snaps on the resulting assembly as a cover.  With two boards, one
>>>> ends up very near the bottom of the U which requires a fair bit of
>>>> flexibility to be able to snap the board into without breaking the
>>>> enclosure.  The other board ends up very near the top of the U which
>>>> requires a fair bit of ridigidity to hold the board in place given the
>>>> distance the sides are from the U.   We think that the current material
>>>> we're planning on having the enclosures use will be both flexible and rigid
>>>> enough - but its' been a bit of a challenge ensuring that.  I'm supposed to
>>>> be getting first samples soon and if that works,  we'll be shipping the 12
>>>> port injectors with 4 jumpers per port to set the pinning.   If this
>>>> iteration doesn't work, we'll just go to production with the 12 port
>>>> injectors without the jumpers and a mechanically less-troublesome
>>>> orientation and then re-spin the 4 port injector fairly soon to add them to
>>>> that product, and then re-visit the 12 port injector jumpers at some future
>>>> date, possibly after the rackmount stuff (hopefully) finally comes out.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, in the meantime, there isn't any reason why you
>>>> shouldn't be able to swap the blue and brown pairs in the cable going both
>>>> into and out of the current syncinjectors to get the non-canopy radios to
>>>> work with gigabit on the syncinjector.
>>>>
>>>> -forrest
>>>> On Apr 16, 2015 6:03 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So what we need is a Syncinjector with jumpers like on the Gigabit PoE
>>>>> injectors...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup screwed there :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2015 7:42 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I remember right, the AF5x pinout is 1/2 & 4/5 positive and 3/6 &
>>>>>>> 7/8 negative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Airmax stuff is all 4/5 positive and 7/8 negative, I imagine the
>>>>>>> 10/100 stuff would work fine with the power pairs swapped, but I don't 
>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>> what that would do to gigabit. I don't think it's going to work with 
>>>>>>> AF5x,
>>>>>>> since they use power on all four pairs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn't check...sorry.  It's on the roof so I can go up and look
>>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  No pinout!?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/16/2015 6:10 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It says 24v/1a and is gigabit.  It is a bit different than the
>>>>>>>>> Nanobeam POEs.  It also doesn't work with an NSM5 for certain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:39 PM, George Skorup (Cyber
>>>>>>>>> Broadcasting) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  What does the AF5x power supply say on the label for pairs or
>>>>>>>>>> pinouts? Or is it the same as their other 24V/1A supplies, but 
>>>>>>>>>> gigabit?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/16/2015 5:29 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly concerned with the Ubnt Airmax stuff (24v) and AF5x.
>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the ePMP works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:12 PM, George Skorup (Cyber
>>>>>>>>>> Broadcasting) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK, the 450AP GigE interface is still powered only on pins 4,
>>>>>>>>>>> 5, 7 & 8. Probably applies to the ePMP Sync radio too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, with that in mind.. does the UBNT GigE PoE stuff use all 4
>>>>>>>>>>> pairs for power? If it's 4, 5, 7 & 8, it may be possible, but... 
>>>>>>>>>>> you'd have
>>>>>>>>>>> to flip the blues and browns at one end. I don't know what that 
>>>>>>>>>>> would do
>>>>>>>>>>> for the GigE data interface though. It might not work. You can use 
>>>>>>>>>>> a 568B
>>>>>>>>>>> to 568A (aka standard cross-over) cable and GigE still works fine, 
>>>>>>>>>>> but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> not sure about crossed blues and browns.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Someone smarter than me would probably have to give you a thumbs
>>>>>>>>>>> up or down.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/16/2015 4:55 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone tried these syncinjectors for Ubnt Airmax radios?
>>>>>>>>>>>> What about anything else?  I'd love to use this one product for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> all sites
>>>>>>>>>>>> from now on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to run the AF5x?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to