Yeah, but it would still be nice if there was on board sync... a lot of times we only need one 900mhz sector on a tower, in which case on board sync would be perfectly fine.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > It's proper to have one sync source at the site anyway. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Aug 16, 2016 5:14 PM, "Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> it would be better if it (450i) had on-board sync so i can power the >> whole tower with one Netonix Switch and be done, but no i gotta mess around >> with a CTM2 or Packet Flux Sync Injector now to get timing on 450i >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:23 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> As others have said, you obviously won't get sync from the Netonix. Plug >>> the 450i *AP* in and go. It is 802.3at compliant, but it will also take >>> passive injected power without issue. And you don't need to change any >>> wires around. It will take either polarity on any pair. Cambium actually >>> did this right. Woulda been even better if they designed for 20-60vdc, but >>> I guess you can never have it all. >>> >>> Out of the 450i series, the only radio that is not 802.3at is the 900 SM >>> which is the old Canopy 29.5v like FSK and regular 450. >>> >>> On 8/16/2016 12:18 PM, Darin Steffl wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> Will a Netonix 48V switch power the PMP450i 900mhz? >>> >>> I'm leaning towards that it will NOT due to needing 48-56V and 802.3at >>> PoE which I don't think Netonix supports. >>> >>> Can anyone confirm my thoughts or tell me I'm wrong and it will work? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Darin Steffl >>> Minnesota WiFi >>> www.mnwifi.com >>> 507-634-WiFi >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >>> >>> >>> >>
