I “only” have 35Meg down x 11 Meg up at my home (VDSL + 10 meg 320 wireless) ….
less than 10 miles away the city nearby has 1G service available to every home
(about 100k people) … I don’t know the actual “uptake” on the 1G service but
have heard it’s significant … 1G unlimited service (1G down x 100 Meg up) @
I would pay the $149/month without hesitation personally ..
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 10:08 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, people certainly want connections that support multiple streams. Paying
> for it, I'm not so sure about... at least around these parts.
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com
> <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Have you ever seen a 1080p youtube video load on a 1GbE active-E FTTH ISP
> that has direct peering with Google from a router 2.5ms upstream? It's a
> beautiful thing.
> People will absolutely pay for connections that support multiple streams,
> take a typical family of 4 or 5 people with kids that want to watch videos on
> tablets simultaneously...
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
> <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
> When people say their video is “buffering”, I assume they mean re-buffering,
> where the video stops and starts.
> I’m starting to wonder if some people are referring to the delay before the
> video starts playing. Is this a thing? And do people pay for faster
> Internet just to make the video start faster, like cut 15-20 seconds down to
> 5 or 10 seconds?