agi  

Messages by Date

• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 AW: AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/19 AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 RE: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Derek Zahn
• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Mark Waser
• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Terren Suydam
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] constructivist issues Abram Demski
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/19 AW: [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI] Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/19 [agi] Re: Meaning, communication and understanding Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/19 AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] constructivist issues Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/19 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Samantha Atkins
• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI David Hart
• 2008/10/19 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Samantha Atkins
• 2008/10/19 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI William Pearson
• 2008/10/19 AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Terren Suydam
• 2008/10/18 [agi] constructivist issues Abram Demski
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] List of Feasibility Objections Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/18 [agi] Thoughtware.TV: Can Robots 'think' Like Humans? Andrés Colón
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] List of Feasibility Objections Abram Demski
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Abram Demski
• 2008/10/18 [agi] List of Feasibility Objections Steve Richfield
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) William Pearson
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI David Hart
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Will Wright's Five Artificial Intelligence Prophecies BillK
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Will Wright's Five Artificial Intelligence Prophecies Bob Mottram
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/18 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 [agi] Re: Will Wright's Five Artificial Intelligence Prophecies Eric Burton
• 2008/10/18 [agi] Will Wright's Five Artificial Intelligence Prophecies Eric Burton
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Harry Chesley
• 2008/10/18 AW: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Steve Richfield
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 Re: AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI wannabe
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI wannabe
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI David Hart
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI.. PS Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/18 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/18 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/17 RE: [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ John G. Rose
• 2008/10/17 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) William Pearson
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ Bob Mottram
• 2008/10/17 RE: [agi] NEWS: Scientist develops programme to understand alien languages John G. Rose
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ Bryan Bishop
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Reasoning by analogy recommendations Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Reasoning by analogy recommendations Pei Wang
• 2008/10/17 [agi] Reasoning by analogy recommendations Harry Chesley
• 2008/10/17 RE: [agi] Re: Defining AGI wannabe
• 2008/10/17 AW: [agi] NEWS: Scientist develops programme to understand alien languages Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/17 [agi] NEWS: Scientist develops programme to understand alien languages Pei Wang
• 2008/10/17 RE: [agi] Re: Defining AGI John G. Rose
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ Bob Mottram
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Advocacy Is no Excuse for Consciousness Eric Burton
• 2008/10/17 Re: [agi] Advocacy Is no Excuse for Consciousness Colin Hales
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Advocacy Is no Excuse for Consciousness John LaMuth
• 2008/10/16 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) peter . burton
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Abram Demski
• 2008/10/16 Re: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Abram Demski
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Abram Demski
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Networks, memory capacity, grid cells... Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 AW: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? charles griffiths
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 [agi] Brain-muscle interface helps paralysed monkeys move Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? charles griffiths
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Colin Hales
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Steve Richfield
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 [agi] First issue of H+ magazine ... http://hplusmagazine.com/ Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Colin Hales
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Re: Defining AGI Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 [agi] Re: Defining AGI Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 [agi] Twice as smart (was Re: RSI without input...) v2.1)) Tim Freeman
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Abram Demski
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/16 RE: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) John G. Rose
• 2008/10/16 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Mark Horvath
• 2008/10/16 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list John G. Rose
• 2008/10/16 AW: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Jean-paul Van Belle
• 2008/10/15 Re: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/15 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Re: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Trent Waddington
• 2008/10/15 AW: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1) Terren Suydam
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list charles griffiths
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Terren Suydam
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Announcement: Journal of Artificial General Intelligence Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Russell Wallace
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/15 Re: AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Rafael C.P.
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] mailing-list / forum software Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Russell Wallace
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1) Charles Hixson
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/15 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 AW: Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/15 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/15 [agi] Who is smart enough to answer this question? Ed Porter
• 2008/10/15 [agi] mailing-list / forum software Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Defining AGI (was Re: AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list) Matt Mahoney
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Russell Wallace
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Russell Wallace
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list John G. Rose
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Rafael C.P.
• 2008/10/15 AW: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Dr. Matthias Heger
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: COMP = false? (was Re: [agi] Advocacy Is no Excuse for Exaggeration) Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Terren Suydam
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Ben Goertzel
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 RE: **JUNK** Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Peter Voss
• 2008/10/15 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list John G. Rose
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Joseph Henry
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Joseph Henry
• 2008/10/15 Re: RSI without input (was Re: [agi] Updated AGI proposal (CMR v2.1)) Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Eric Burton
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Mike Tintner
• 2008/10/15 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Peter Voss
• 2008/10/15 Re: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Vladimir Nesov
• 2008/10/15 RE: [agi] META: A possible re-focusing of this list Derek Zahn

• Earlier messages
• Later messages