atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Thomas Broyer
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
• 2006/10/26 RE: Adding POST capability to atom:link Gopalan Sri
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link James M Snell
• 2006/10/26 Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Thomas Broyer
• 2006/10/26 Adding POST capability to atom:link Gopalan Sri
• 2006/10/24 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Stefan Eissing
• 2006/10/23 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/23 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
• 2006/10/23 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 James M Snell
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Henry Story
• 2006/10/18 Re: Question on undefinedAttribute/Content Thomas Broyer
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Henry Story
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 James M Snell
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Henry Story
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Henry Story
• 2006/10/18 Re: Question on undefinedAttribute/Content A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Andreas Sewe
• 2006/10/18 Question on undefinedAttribute/Content Jan Algermissen
• 2006/10/18 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11 James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: AD Evaluation -- extensions Eric Scheid
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Anne van Kesteren
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Nicolas Krebs
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Atom Export of source text Elliotte Harold
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace James M Snell
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/10/17 Re: [atom-syntax] Atom bidi Nicolas Krebs
• 2006/10/17 SPARQLing Roller Henry Story
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/17 [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace Nicolas Krebs
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/17 Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/10/16 Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29 Julian Reschke
• 2006/10/16 Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29 IESG Secretary
• 2006/10/13 Atom bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/12 New version of License Draft James M Snell
• 2006/10/12 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
• 2006/10/12 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
• 2006/10/11 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/11 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/11 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/10 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
• 2006/10/09 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Thomas Broyer
• 2006/10/09 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Andreas Sewe
• 2006/10/08 Python implementation of RFC4287, RFC4685 and APP Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/10/05 Re: Searching for Atom-enabled code A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/05 Re: Searching for Atom-enabled code Joe Gregorio
• 2006/10/05 Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/05 Re: PaceAtomBidi David Powell
• 2006/10/05 Searching for Atom-enabled code John Panzer
• 2006/10/05 RE: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 David Hall
• 2006/10/05 I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-11.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2006/10/05 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Julian Reschke
• 2006/10/04 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Re: [rss-public] Re: Bidirectional content in RSS James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07 Mark Nottingham
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/04 Re: Atom Export James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/04 Fwd: Atom and bidi Henry Story
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/04 Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/10/04 Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/04 Re: PaceAtomBidi David Powell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 PaceAtomBidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Bill de hOra
• 2006/10/03 Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/03 Re: Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Clarify foreign markup: [was Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?] Bill de hOra
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Paul Hoffman
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi James Holderness
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Anne van Kesteren
• 2006/10/03 Re: Atom and bidi Eric Scheid
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Martin Duerst
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom and bidi James M Snell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) David Powell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) Karl Dubost
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) David Powell
• 2006/10/02 Atom and bidi (was: Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard?) James M Snell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? James M Snell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Julian Reschke
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Julian Reschke
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Export James M Snell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Paul Hoffman
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Elliotte Harold
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Export Elliotte Harold
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Eric Scheid
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Export A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? James M Snell
• 2006/10/02 Re: Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2006/10/02 Atom Syndication Format To Draft Standard? Robert Sayre
• 2006/10/01 Re: Atom Export James M Snell
• 2006/10/01 Re: Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/09/28 Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? Henry Story
• 2006/09/27 Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? John Panzer
• 2006/09/27 Re: Atom Export James M Snell
• 2006/09/27 Re: Atom Export Bill de hOra
• 2006/09/27 URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement? Tim Bray
• 2006/09/27 Atom Export Alastair Rankine
• 2006/09/26 RFC 4685 on Atom Threading Extensions rfc-editor
• 2006/09/26 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Eric Scheid
• 2006/09/26 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Tim Bray
• 2006/09/26 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Sam Ruby
• 2006/09/26 Re: Atom Threading Extensions, RFC 4685 Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/09/25 Atom Threading Extensions, RFC 4685 James M Snell
• 2006/09/20 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07.txt Stefan Eissing
• 2006/09/18 Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07.txt Mark Nottingham
• 2006/09/14 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Paul Hoffman
• 2006/09/14 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Martin Duerst
• 2006/09/14 Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol James M Snell
• 2006/09/14 WG Last Call for draft-ietf-atompub-protocol Paul Hoffman
• 2006/09/13 Re: versioning extension? Julian Reschke
• 2006/09/13 Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
• 2006/09/13 Re: versioning extension? Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/09/13 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-10.txt Tim Bray
• 2006/09/12 Re: Atom Revisions (was versioning extension?) James M Snell
• 2006/09/12 Atom Revisions (was versioning extension?) Jan Algermissen
• 2006/09/12 I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-10.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2006/09/12 Re: versioning extension? Thomas Broyer
• 2006/09/12 Re: versioning extension? Andreas Sewe
• 2006/09/12 Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
• 2006/09/11 Re: versioning extension? Tim Bray
• 2006/09/11 Re: versioning extension? Karl Dubost
• 2006/09/11 Re: versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
• 2006/09/11 Re: versioning extension? Tim Bray
• 2006/09/11 versioning extension? Jan Algermissen
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements Tim Bray
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements Tim Bray
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James M Snell
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
• 2006/09/11 Re: Private extensions and relation to atom elements James M Snell
• 2006/09/11 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/11 Private extensions and relation to atom elements James Aylett
• 2006/09/11 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/08 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/07 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) John Panzer
• 2006/09/07 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/07 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) John Panzer

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]