atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2006/09/07 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Elliotte Harold
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Karl Dubost
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) David Powell
• 2006/09/06 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Antone Roundy
• 2006/09/06 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Wendy Seltzer
• 2006/09/06 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/06 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) John Panzer
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/06 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Thomas Roessler
• 2006/09/05 RE: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Bob Wyman
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) John Panzer
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 atom liense extension (was Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Mike Linksvayer
• 2006/09/05 Re: XML Digital Signatures in Atom feeds and entries James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) Wendy Seltzer
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 Re: atom license extension (Re: [cc-tab] *important* heads up) James M Snell
• 2006/09/05 RE: XML Digital Signatures in Atom feeds and entries Granqvist, Hans
• 2006/09/04 XML Digital Signatures in Atom feeds and entries James M Snell
• 2006/09/02 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? M. David Peterson
• 2006/09/02 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? M. David Peterson
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? James Holderness
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? M. David Peterson
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? Asbjørn Ulsberg
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? M. David Peterson
• 2006/08/31 Re: Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? Sam Ruby
• 2006/08/30 Can/Does/Should the FeedValidator catch improperly escaped XHTML? M. David Peterson
• 2006/08/22 Re: Atom license link last call Andreas Sewe
• 2006/08/21 RE: Atom license link last call Bob Wyman
• 2006/08/21 RE: Finally Atom: Blogger is here Bob Wyman
• 2006/08/19 Atomixlib update for you pythoners Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/08/18 New Feed Rank Draft James M Snell
• 2006/08/18 Re: Atom license link last call James M Snell
• 2006/08/18 RE: Atom license link last call Bob Wyman
• 2006/08/17 Re: Atom license link last call James M Snell
• 2006/08/17 Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt Andreas Sewe
• 2006/08/16 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt Bill de hÓra
• 2006/08/16 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt Mark Nottingham
• 2006/08/15 Re: Atom license link last call Karl Dubost
• 2006/08/15 Re: Atom license link last call James M Snell
• 2006/08/15 Re: Atom license link last call Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2006/08/15 Finally Atom: Blogger is here A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/08/15 Re: Atom license link last call James M Snell
• 2006/08/15 Re: Atom license link last call Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2006/08/14 Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license) The IESG
• 2006/08/14 Fwd: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license) Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/08/14 Atom license link last call James M Snell
• 2006/08/13 Re: atom:updated - not now() values? Bill de hÓra
• 2006/08/13 Re: atom:updated - not now() values? Tim Bray
• 2006/08/13 atom:updated - not now() values? Eric Scheid
• 2006/08/13 Re: link element alternate and self A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/08/13 link element alternate and self Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/08/04 Re: Atom and RSS Security Issues James M Snell
• 2006/08/04 Re: Atom and RSS Security Issues James Holderness
• 2006/08/04 Atom and RSS Security Issues James M Snell
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Thomas Broyer
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation James M Snell
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Eric Scheid
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Thomas Broyer
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Eric Scheid
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Thomas Broyer
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation James Aylett
• 2006/07/27 Re: Language Negotiation Thomas Broyer
• 2006/07/26 Re: Language Negotiation James M Snell
• 2006/07/26 Re: Language Negotiation David Powell
• 2006/07/26 Language Negotiation James M Snell
• 2006/07/26 Re: clarification: "escaped" James Holderness
• 2006/07/26 Re: clarification: "escaped" A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/07/26 Re: clarification: "escaped" Antone Roundy
• 2006/07/26 Re: clarification: "escaped" Bill de hÓra
• 2006/07/25 Re: clarification: "escaped" A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/07/25 Re: Re: clarification: "escaped" Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/25 Re: clarification: "escaped" Bill de hÓra
• 2006/07/25 Re: clarification: "escaped" Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/25 clarification: "escaped" Bill de hÓra
• 2006/07/24 Available Extensions Sammy
• 2006/07/23 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Sam Hartman
• 2006/07/19 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/07/19 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/19 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
• 2006/07/19 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/07/19 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
• 2006/07/18 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/07/18 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/18 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Eric Rescorla
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Eric Rescorla
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options James Holderness
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Eric Rescorla
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Eric Rescorla
• 2006/07/17 Re: HTTP Authentication Options Julian Reschke
• 2006/07/17 HTTP Authentication Options Eric Rescorla
• 2006/07/16 Re: Very brief minutes from the Atompub WG meeting Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/16 Very brief minutes from the Atompub WG meeting Paul Hoffman
• 2006/07/14 Re: RSS Extension for Security Information Exchange A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/07/13 Re: RSS Extension for Security Information Exchange masato . terada . rd
• 2006/07/13 Re: RSS Extension for Security Information Exchange A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/07/13 RSS Extension for Security Information Exchange Masato Terada
• 2006/07/11 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/07/11 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/11 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Martin Duerst
• 2006/07/09 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/07/04 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/07/01 atomixlib: A Python Atom generator Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/06/30 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt Stefan Eissing
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt James M Snell
• 2006/06/29 Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt James M Snell
• 2006/06/29 Re: Two minor editorial suggestions (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt) Bill de hÓra
• 2006/06/29 Re: Two minor editorial suggestions (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt) Eric Scheid
• 2006/06/29 Re: Two minor editorial suggestions (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt) Bill de hÓra
• 2006/06/29 Two minor editorial suggestions (Was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt) Andreas Sewe
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt Bill de hÓra
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt Bill de hÓra
• 2006/06/29 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Bill de hÓra
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt James M Snell
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt James M Snell
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/06/29 Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt James M Snell
• 2006/06/29 I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt Internet-Drafts
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/06/28 Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-06.txt Mark Nottingham
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Henry Story
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Henry Story
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Henri Sivonen
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Antone Roundy
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests David Powell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James Holderness
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Antone Roundy
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests David Powell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Henri Sivonen
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Sam Ruby
• 2006/06/28 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/06/27 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James Holderness
• 2006/06/27 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/27 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/27 Re: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests James M Snell
• 2006/06/27 Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05.txt] Peter Saint-Andre
• 2006/06/27 http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XhtmlContentDivConformanceTests Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/27 Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05.txt] Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/06/27 Re: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/27 Re: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element James M Snell
• 2006/06/27 RE: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element Laurent Le Meur
• 2006/06/27 Re: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element Thomas Broyer
• 2006/06/26 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/26 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/26 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Paul Hoffman
• 2006/06/26 Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/26 Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard The IESG
• 2006/06/26 [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05.txt] Peter Saint-Andre
• 2006/06/26 Re: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/06/26 [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element Nicolas Krebs
• 2006/06/24 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/24 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/06/24 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Paul Hoffman
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Robert Sayre
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Paul Hoffman
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/06/23 Re: Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
• 2006/06/23 Feed Thread approved as a Proposed Standard James M Snell
• 2006/06/19 Dublin Core and Atom: Any plans for an (Informational) RFC? Andreas Sewe
• 2006/06/19 Re: Dublin Core and Atom: Any plans for an (Informational) RFC? Henry Story
• 2006/06/18 Please confirm (conf#b9cfd6842edca838fe933fde4ef35abe) Peter Saint-Andre
• 2006/06/18 Re: Atom in the latest Indigo M. David Peterson
• 2006/06/18 Re: Atom in the latest Indigo boss
• 2006/06/17 Atom in the latest Indigo M. David Peterson
• 2006/06/14 Atom N3 Henry Story

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]