Thank you. And found this...
346.35 Method of giving signals on turning and stopping. Whenever a stop or
turn signal is required by s. 346.34, such signal may in any event be given
by a signal lamp or lamps of a type meeting the specifications set forth in
s.347.15. Except as provided in s.347.15, such signals also may be given by
the hand and arm in lieu of or in addition to signals by signal lamp. When
given by hand and arm, such signals shall be given from the left side of the
vehicle in the following manner and shall indicate as follows:
(1) Left turn—Hand and arm extended horizontally. (2) Right turn—Hand
and arm extended upward. (3) Stop or decrease speed—Hand and arm extended
downward.
http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/safety/vehicle/bicycle/docs/bikelaws.pdf
pax, kel
robert paolino writes:
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 21:07 -0500, Dave Minden wrote:
My understanding is that several years ago it became legal if not
recommended for bicyclists to signal right turns with the right hand.
Remember, the original left hand for right turn was from when cars were
first made and did not have blinkers for signaling. Pretty outdated now...
Recommended?? I would think that the traditional right turn signal
would be preferable both because it's the side a motorist is more likely
to see, and because if I'm going to have only one hand on a brake, I'd
rather it be the right hand if I need to use it.
--
Now go have a beer,
Bob Paolino
"Are Canadians just Americans who carry hockey
sticks instead of guns,
or is there more to it than that?"
--"This Canadian Existence"
Wisconsin Public Radio
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign
X against HTML e-mail:
/ \ Friends don't send friends HTML-bloated messages!
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top-posting frowned upon?
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org