The BMW UUC Digest 
Volume 2 : Issue 142 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
  BMW vs. Porsche
  Re: BMW vs. Porsche
  Re: 91 525 For Sale or Parts?
  Re: 91 525 For Sale or Parts?
  Re: Wanted:  Automatic transmission 89 325i
  Re: Sticky caliper Rebuld procedure.
  Re: Sticky caliper Rebuld procedure.
  E60 M5 pictures from Spain
  Re: E60 M5 pictures from Spain
  Z3 rear caliper tq spec
  Re: [uuc] Z3 rear caliper tq spec
  Re: Z3 rear caliper tq spec

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:19:10 -0700
From: "Kevin Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BMW BMW BMW BMW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: BMW vs. Porsche
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Scott Staewen wrote:

> I'm thinking about trading my '01 M5 for a p-car. Now that my
> older son is  driving, I don't really need the extra seating. I'd like
> a simpler and  lighter car. As much as I love my M5, its service
> record I think has been  less than stellar, although probably about
> par for BMW (cam position  sensors, final stage resistor, and recently,
> vanos replacement). I'm hoping  a Porsche would be better, but I
> haven't owned a Porsche and I don't know if  that's a realistic
expectation. > So let me ask those of you who have  experience with both
marques how
> maintenance, dependability, and overall cost of ownership  compares.
> My guess is that higher entry cost of the  Porsche might be more than
> offset by less depreciation, and fewer expensive repairs when out of
> warranty.

I have not owned a Porsche for a few years since for me a Porsche is a great
"third car" and is not a direct replacement for a BMW or a SUV (I'm just
talking about Porsche cars not the new ugly overpriced Porsche SUVs).  If
you never need a back seat or a place to lock a couple golf bags out of site
you are in luck and will have a lot of fun in a Porsche if you sell the M5.

As far as depreciation and maint. a Porsche should be about the same as most
high performance BMWs (I talk quite a bit with my boss has three P-Cars and
two BMWs and my upstairs neighbor that shares my garage who recently
replaced his 2002 C4 Cabrio with a 2003 S4 Coupe).  Late model P-cars seem
to have about the same number of problems as late model BMWs (which is a lot
less than Scott has had with his M5).

With rare exceptions late model expensive cars depreciate like rocks (I
would be lucky to get $15K for my 1998 Range Rover that cost close to $70K
in 1998).  The overall depreciation on P Cars and M cars seems to be better
than average due to the limited supply but they still depreciate.  I just
went to the Edmunds.com site and the 2000 M5 that sold for $72K on average
has an average value of $47K ($6,250/year of depreciation) today, while the
2000 Carrera that sold for $75K on average has an average value of $51K
($6,000/year of depreciation) today.

Kevin Kelly
BMW CCA 50039


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:01:14 -0500
From: "Scott Staewen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BMW vs. Porsche
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Thanks Kevin,

I'm still up in the air about what to do. The first thing is to get my M5 
sorted out. The SES light is back on, and judging from the way it sounds, 
it's probably another bad cam position sensor. Now that I have  new vanos 
units on both banks, maybe with new sensors it will run for a while and I'll 
be happy with it agian. Who knows. But it seems like a fantasy that there's 
any flat stretch on the cost-of-ownership curve for these cars. You can take 
the initial depreciation plunge, or take your chances with subsequent high$ 
repairs.

Scott




>I have not owned a Porsche for a few years since for me a Porsche is a 
>great
>"third car" and is not a direct replacement for a BMW or a SUV (I'm just
>talking about Porsche cars not the new ugly overpriced Porsche SUVs).  If
>you never need a back seat or a place to lock a couple golf bags out of 
>site
>you are in luck and will have a lot of fun in a Porsche if you sell the M5.
>
>As far as depreciation and maint. a Porsche should be about the same as 
>most
>high performance BMWs (I talk quite a bit with my boss has three P-Cars and
>two BMWs and my upstairs neighbor that shares my garage who recently
>replaced his 2002 C4 Cabrio with a 2003 S4 Coupe).  Late model P-cars seem
>to have about the same number of problems as late model BMWs (which is a 
>lot
>less than Scott has had with his M5).
>
>With rare exceptions late model expensive cars depreciate like rocks (I
>would be lucky to get $15K for my 1998 Range Rover that cost close to $70K
>in 1998).  The overall depreciation on P Cars and M cars seems to be better
>than average due to the limited supply but they still depreciate.  I just
>went to the Edmunds.com site and the 2000 M5 that sold for $72K on average
>has an average value of $47K ($6,250/year of depreciation) today, while the
>2000 Carrera that sold for $75K on average has an average value of $51K
>($6,000/year of depreciation) today.
>
>Kevin Kelly
>BMW CCA 50039
>

_________________________________________________________________
Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN 
Premium! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/mlb&pgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:42:15 -0500
From: "Karl Zemlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 91 525 For Sale or Parts?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If you choose to part it out, I might be interested is some parts for my '94
525 touring (assuming they fit).

I'm in Indianapolis.  Please keep me in mind if you go that route.  I don't
have the time or the space for a parts car.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve & Barb Conner
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [UUC] 91 525 For Sale or Parts?


We have a 91 525 with 290,000 miles and some body damage that we are done
using.  We have had the car for about the last 40,000 miles and have taken
care of it very well.  It has a rebuilt tranny, good control arms w/750
bushings, a new set of coils and just about every other sensor on the engine
(the coils ultimately fixed the problem) replaced. The insides are decent,
but my step-son ran into the back of someone at faily low speed and busted
the front bumper cover, some grill parts, etc.  The car still runs and
drives perfectly, but I just don't have any further use for it.  Does anyone
on this list want this car or should I try to part it out.  Obviously, I am
not looking for very much money from it, but I would like to see someone
else have it, if they would actually drive the car.  If you are interested
or just have some advice for me, please drop me a line.  Thanks.

Steve Conner
Kokomo, IN


Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short
Shifter - accept no substitutes! 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com





------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:53:14 -0400
From: "Brett Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "UUC Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 91 525 For Sale or Parts?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> -----Original Message-----
> We have a 91 525 with 290,000 miles and some body damage that we are done
> using.

Hi Steve,

Call me on 440 338 1650.

Thanks

Brett Anderson
KMS

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.655 / Virus Database: 420 - Release Date: 4/8/2004



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:43:04 -0400
From: "Robinson, Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Wanted:  Automatic transmission 89 325i
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Why?  ;)

Lee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Marino
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 17:11
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UUC] Wanted: Automatic transmission 89 325i
> 
> 
> Group,
>  
> I need an automatic transmission for an 89 325i four door.
>  
> I would like the tranny to be in/around the Los Angeles area 
> to avoid the
> expense (and wait) of shipping.
>  
> Anyone...?
>  
> Chris
> 
> Search the 
> ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ____________
> In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of 
> the BMW CCA.
> 
> UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
> Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
> 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
> 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sticky caliper Rebuld procedure.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-----Original Message-----
>From: "David A. Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<detailed description of caliper rebuild snipped>

Dave,

Thanks for the tips, I especially liked your suggestions for the post-repair 
celebration!  I tried Sam's suggestion last night and it seems to have done the trick 
for the moment, but considering the level of effort required to get the piston fully 
retracted it definitely needs a rebuild.  If I'd had the new seals on hand I would 
have done the rebuild last night as I ended up having to disconnect the caliper 
anyway.  If I can pick up a couple sets of seals on the way home from work tonight 
I'll rebuild both front calipers this weekend. 

Brian



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:21:13 -0500
From: "Sam Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sticky caliper Rebuld procedure.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I am always wanting to learn.  Why did you have to disconnect the caliper?
I have heard several people say that the piston would not go back into the
cylinder (caliper) until they disconnected it.  There is no reason for this
that I know of except that the hose is stopped up which is pretty far out.
As I was visiting a neighbor the other day I came upon him about to
disconnect the hose. He said it was because the piston would not go back far
enough to allow for the new pads.  I proceeded to apply leverage in a proper
way and the piston went back all the way.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Daley
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UUC] Sticky caliper Rebuld procedure.


-----Original Message-----
>From: "David A. Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<detailed description of caliper rebuild snipped>

Dave,

Thanks for the tips, I especially liked your suggestions for the post-repair
celebration!  I tried Sam's suggestion last night and it seems to have done
the trick for the moment, but considering the level of effort required to
get the piston fully retracted it definitely needs a rebuild.  If I'd had
the new seals on hand I would have done the rebuild last night as I ended up
having to disconnect the caliper anyway.  If I can pick up a couple sets of
seals on the way home from work tonight I'll rebuild both front calipers
this weekend.

Brian


Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andre Yew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: E60 M5 pictures from Spain
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I think the front 3/4 view of the next M5 is really nice:

http://www.bmwm5.com/articles/tenerife/tenerife.htm

--Andre



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:18:19 -0700
From: "Grant Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: E60 M5 pictures from Spain
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I think the front 3/4 view of the next M5 is really nice:
> 
> http://www.bmwm5.com/articles/tenerife/tenerife.htm
> 
> --Andre

Shew.  That's really nice.  I don't know if it counts as "flame surfacing",
but if it does, that's fine with me.  I like the sculpting on the rear end,
and the whole thing is just aggressive, in a good way.

Grant



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:27:08 -0400
From: "Robinson, Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'UUCDigest'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Z3 rear caliper tq spec
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I'm helping out a friend by changing the rear brake pads in his '96 Z3 1.9.
What are the torque specs for the cailper-to-bracket bolts/guide pins?

Thanks,
Lee

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:10:59 -0700
From: "Marco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] Z3 rear caliper tq spec
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"snug" beyond finger tight ;-)

Seriously it's pretty low and I just give it a tug after they stop turning
freely.

Marco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robinson, Lee
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 12:27 PM
To: 'UUCDigest'
Subject: [uuc] [UUC] Z3 rear caliper tq spec


I'm helping out a friend by changing the rear brake pads in his '96 Z3 1.9.
What are the torque specs for the cailper-to-bracket bolts/guide pins?

Thanks,
Lee
Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________________________________
In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.

UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate
Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:35:52 -0700
From: Jim Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Z3 rear caliper tq spec
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

At 12:27 PM 4/16/04, Robinson, Lee talked about:
>I'm helping out a friend by changing the rear brake pads in his '96 Z3 1.9.
>What are the torque specs for the cailper-to-bracket bolts/guide pins?

Assuming the specs to be similar to an E36 (yeah, I know :-)), from the 
Bentley:
Guide pins - 22 ft-lbs (as Marco said, snug :-))
Caliper bracket bolts - 50 ft-lbs

Hope that helps,

Jim Bassett
----
Hardware Engineer for hire
http://www.jimbassett.com/Resume1.htm


------------------------------

End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(12 messages)
**********

Reply via email to