Julie...
You have first handed knowledge of being a change agent...and I want to
THANK YOU for the strength to do so...
I could only answer in an ethical model...you answered with the history of
this division!!!
As always you are a first class person...it is a pleasure to have someone
like you in the dog world!!!
Take care,
Kathy Yonkers
----------
>From: Julie Sturman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] that piece of paper
>Date: SunSep 7022020012001206:27 PM
>
> Carol
> You didn't address this question to me but I'll answer it anyway.
> For those people who were in the CKCSC USA at the time of AKC recognition
> who fought and lied and damned the AKC and then promptly began to show in
> both venues - yes, I agree that is hypocritical but for the main body of
> cavalier owners who really never knew what went on, for the people who have
> started to show in the past seven years, I don't see that it is
> hypocritical at all. The AKC is the world recognized registering body for
> purebred dogs in this country. The CKCSC USA still has members who breed
> and show pretty nice dogs and sell some of them to pretty nice people.
> Should those people be penalized and prohibited from enjoying both venues
> who aren't really in competition anyhow?
> The AKC is not a club that individuals belong to. Clubs are member
> clubs but individuals don't even have to be members of any club to
> register, breed, and show their dogs. The CKCSC USA is a club that holds
> shows and gives awards to their members only. So long as the people showing
> in both venues recognize them for what they are and don't sling mud at each
> other, I see nothing at all wrong with it.
> Because I was one of the original 12 who was involved at the time
> of recognition, I wouldn't go near CKCSC USA shows (nor would I be welcome)
> but I can't be angry at every member of their club or at anyone who likes
> to show as much and in as many places as they can.
> Thoughts on this anyone?
> Julie
>
>
> At 01:51 PM 9/2/01 -0700, you wrote:
>>Kathy:
>>
>>Since you are the ethical behavioralist on this list, I would like to
>>ask you a question that has had me puzzeled for a long time. How can
>>anyone, ethically, be involved in both the AKC registry/club and
>>CKCUSA? I may be totally wrong but it appears to me that to belong to
>>both would be hypocritical.
>>
>>Carol Williams
>>
>>=========================================================
>>"Magic Commands":
>>to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
>>to start it up gain click here:
>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>>
>> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
>>Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>>
>>All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.
>
> =========================================================
> "Magic Commands":
> to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
> to start it up gain click here:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
> Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
> All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.
=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.
