+1 support for graduation.

Wei HE

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the readiness
> for the graduation.
>
> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
> comments for your review, Thanks!
>
> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>
> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of website. we
> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link from
> navigator menu on website.
>
> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item, from
> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest" which
> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.*
>
> Yes, we will fix it through Apache Jira MNEMONIC-353(reviewed) and
> MNEMONIC-356(WIP)
>
> *CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from committers
> or from contributors.  If I take
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60> as an example, the
> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.*
>
> We have requested to revoke all stalled PRs, and all commit messages must
> contain Apache JIRA number and title.
>
> *LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> *most*)*
>
> Yes we will correct it with "The files in the project source repository
> have appropriate headers", The files under target/ that generated by mvn
> building process would be excluded and all other project files have been
> properly licensed and guarded by RAT plugin.
>
> *RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/
> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/> but that doesn't include any
> download links.  http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
> <http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/> does include download
> links to the proper release mirrors.*
>
> That has been corrected by replacing it with the link
> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/
>
> *RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).*
>
> Yes, we started with the community vote for releasing and the result
> explicitly shows binding and non-binding votes.
>
> *RE30 - Again, not using mirror.*
>
> Looks no mirror link in this field.
>
> *RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
> releases."*
>
> Yes it is and corrected
>
> *RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.*
>
> Sorry I forgot it and corrected it by the Apache Jira ticket MNEMONIC-357
> (resolved) as well as MNEMONIC-358 (resolved)
>
> *QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> linters, sonar, etc.*
>
> Yes, we will investigate this plugin and apply them to project later, as
> for now, the QU10 has been replaced with "YES. The project records all bugs
> in the Apache’s JIRA issue tracker. Developer also uses Eclipse or Intellij
> IDEA to improve their code quality."
>
> *QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm
> this.*
>
> The QU20 has been replaced with "YES. Security issues would be treated with
> the highest priority, computing service and memory service are separated
> from other modules and defined by interfaces, so security concerns could be
> largely mitigated by introduced this design at first place.", that this
> emphasize we consider the security aspect from design viewpoint as well.
>
> *QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.*
>
> We have asked owners to properly handle those tickets
>
> *CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?*
>
> They are stalled PRs, we have asked the owner to properly revoke them.
>
> *The full checklist as follows for you to add comments*
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg7jLFp
> -ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Very truly yours
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:25 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Huge +1 to that.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:18 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The "checklist" suppose to just provide guide for readiness our
> > > graduation. It was NOT mandatory checklist.
> > >
> > > This should be used primarily for self check to make sure we are ready
> > for
> > > graduation.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> So first, I'll say its always great to see a podling aim to graduate.
> > Its
> > >> not up to me to measure whether the podling has been successful or
> not,
> > >> but
> > >> instead the IPMC as a whole.  I can give you some feedback on the APMM
> > >> assessment, but I'll point out that I'm not a fan of this form and
> > >> completing this form is not a requirement for graduation.
> > >>
> > >> So please, when reviewing the below list, understand that completing
> > this
> > >> is not a requirement for graduation.  Even then, podlings who think
> they
> > >> pass it may be missing things.
> > >>
> > >> CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought me to
> > >> your
> > >> source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless you're on
> > gitbox,
> > >> the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.
> > >>
> > >> CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this item,
> > from
> > >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
> > which
> > >> today is C7.2, but in a few months will be C7.3.
> > >>
> > >> CD50 - I can't tell if the pull requests to your repo are from
> > committers
> > >> or from contributors.  If I take
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/pull/60 as an example,
> the
> > >> commit message says nothing about provenance of the source code.
> > >>
> > >> LC50 - You mention in your response why this is incorrect (the use of
> > >> *most*)
> > >>
> > >> RE10 - You link to http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/news/ but
> that
> > >> doesn't include any download links.
> > >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/downloads/ does include download
> > >> links
> > >> to the proper release mirrors.
> > >>
> > >> RE20 - You mention non-PMC members in the vote (PPMC).
> > >>
> > >> RE30 - Again, not using mirror.
> > >>
> > >> RE40 - Correct answer would be "NO. We do not distribute binary
> > releases."
> > >>
> > >> RE50 - Your release process neglects deleting old artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> QU10 - Code quality is more than bug reports.  You may want to use
> > >> linters,
> > >> sonar, etc.
> > >>
> > >> QU20 - This is only achievable if you've had a security vulnerability
> > >> reported.  If you haven't had one reported, there's no way to confirm
> > >> this.
> > >>
> > >> QU50 - I see that MNEMONIC-203/217 have been open for around 6 months.
> > >>
> > >> CO10 - Github shows two pull requests open without any commentary or
> > >> questions from the project's committers.  Why is that?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:00 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi John, Our Mentors and PPMCs
> > >> >
> > >> > We have prepared Apache Maturity checklist for your evaluation,
> please
> > >> > guide us to graduate our project, thanks.
> > >> >
> > >> > All comments and suggestions are welcome!
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers!
> > >> > Gary
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi John
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Fixed it, Thank you for reminding me
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Very truly yours
> > >> >> Gary
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:39 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Please take a look at
> > >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org
> >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> Hi John
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> This issue has been fixed please refresh your browser and then
> > review
> > >> >>>> it, Thanks!
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> Hi John
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for pointing it
> out,
> > >> we
> > >> >>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Thanks!
> > >> >>>>> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <
> > >> johndam...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts, but
> you
> > >> >>>>>> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
> > >> >>>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old releases
> > >> should
> > >> >>>>>> be archived.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't find
> > >> anything
> > >> >>>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going to be
> > >> >>>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and you'll
> > >> want
> > >> >>>>>> to grab your specific version from there.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> John
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > ga...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Hi John,
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator in home
> > >> page,
> > >> >>>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you very much
> > for
> > >> the
> > >> >>>>>>> suggestion.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > >> ga...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Hi John,
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> You can download all versions of the package from Apache
> > >> >>>>>>>> distribution site that is linked from the following web page
> > >> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Also, we can download them from Apache Mirrored Github page
> > >> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/releases
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> We could add another menu item on top of home page dedicated
> > for
> > >> >>>>>>>> downloading the latest one.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>>>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament <
> > >> >>>>>>>> johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> I'm looking at your website.  How do I download Mnemonic?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> John
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:37 PM Gary Wong <
> qich...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Uma
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, We are going to send out this checklist for PPMC
> review,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the guidance.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> uma.ganguma...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> What is the mentors call on this?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist
> > to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> check where
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that
> will
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> help to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> assess better?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Uma
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George" <jo...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .
> We
> > >> have
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> a stable
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >release and we work well as a apache community under the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> guidance of our
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Dear John and Patrick,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> construction of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>Mnemonic
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this
> Apache
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> server hosted
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by
> > dedicated
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> community
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from
> > Github
> > >> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> our Apache
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in
> > >> project
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> README.md
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> file. Please review it as follows.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of
> this
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> website,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>please
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Very truly yours.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> johndam...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > Hi patrick,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the
> > >> team.  I
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> personally
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Specifically saying
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> that
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > you need to learn it from github.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > John
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs
> (and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> increase
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> community
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document
> release
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> procedures I
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>feel
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > that
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed.
> If
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> there is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>interest
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to
> you
> > -
> > >> do
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> you feel
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> you're
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > ready to graduate at this point?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Patrick
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ddu...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve
> that
> > >> with
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> new
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> committers
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> from different organizations. We have had
> > >> contributions
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> from other
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> companies like Cisco recently.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> This space is about to heat up soon and we will
> see
> > >> more
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>committers.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> cheers
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> debo
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ph...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > I've mentored a number of podlings over the
> years
> > >> and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> this one if
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> very
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> well
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my
> main
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> concern is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>about
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> self-governing
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> communities".
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#
> > community
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > That's pretty clear and concise statements from
> > the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>community
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > as
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> a
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > whole as to what it takes. The podling is
> > following
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> "the apache
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>way"
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> quite
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > well, so it's really the sustaining part for me.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ensuring that
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> community is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > being built and the community as a whole is
> owning
> > >> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> process.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > Hope this helps, regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > Patrick
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >><apurt...@apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > For me the best test if a podling is ready for
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> graduation is
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>they
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> do
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> it
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > (mostly) for themselves. So, Mnemonic, I'd
> > >> encourage
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> you to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>search
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > through
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > the incubator mailing list archives for
> examples
> > >> of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> other
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>podlings
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > running
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > a graduation vote and submitting the result to
> > the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> IPMC. Then,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>do
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > it.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > I'm glad to see the recent move to bring in
> more
> > >> RMs
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>response
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > earlier feedback, now that everyone is aware
> of
> > >> it.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> didn't
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> think
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > that the incubator report might not be read
> > back.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament
> <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > johndam...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> Patrick,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> I read it.  I'm curious, did you or Andrew
> > share
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> your feedback
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> with
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> Mnemonic directly?  I've noticed that
> podlings
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> sometimes don't
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> see
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> input, and don't receive responses the way
> TLPs
> > >> do.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> For the podling's information, we do also
> > >> maintain
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> a whimsy
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>page
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> all
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> approved board reports per project, Mnemonic
> > can
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> see that
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > information
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> here:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> https://whimsy.apache.org/
> > board/minutes/Mnemonic
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> When I see a podling receiving 5 +1's on a
> dev
> > >> list
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>vote,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > that's a
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> great sign.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> There probably is room for more on list
> > >> discussion,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> and yes
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > committer
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> diversity isn't 100% there (I would be
> curious
> > to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> see company
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> affiliations).
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> I'll also point out that I sometimes ask
> these
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> questions to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > podlings
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> get
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> them to start thinking about graduation, not
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> actually moving
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > forward
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> yet
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> due to $reasons.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Patrick Hunt <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ph...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > Hi John, did you read my feedback on the
> most
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> recent podling
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> report?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > Do
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > you disagree? I don't believe this has
> > changed
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>significantly in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > past
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > month/two. For example all releases have
> been
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> done by a
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>single
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> person.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/
> incubator/March2017
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > As I've mentioned previously my only
> concerns
> > >> at
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> this point
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>are
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> around
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > diversity.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > Patrick
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary)
> > >> Wang <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > ga...@apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> Hi John and PPMCs
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> As John advised, our community and project
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> mnemonic might
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>be
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> ready to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> get
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> graduated, I'd like to start the following
> > >> votes
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> according
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > the
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> processes
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> of
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> your
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> mentoring
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> and guidance if no objection today
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>    - Community graduation vote
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>    - IPMC recommendation vote
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> +Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM,
> Gang(Gary)
> > >> Wang
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> ga...@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Hi John
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Yes, our community is growing and
> continue
> > >> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> attract
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>more
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> people
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> join
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > our community. Some industry users are
> > aware
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> of mnemonic
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > already
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> get
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > interested as i known.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Mnemonic is able to deliver unique
> values
> > to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> their
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>business
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > so I
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> think
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > that it is very important for us to get
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> mnemonic
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>graduated
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> in
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> time
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > if
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > qualified.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> graduate
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>Mnemonic,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > I'm
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > also
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > looking forward to propose our project
> as
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache TLP.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Thanks!
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Very truly yours
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > Gary
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament <
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> johndam...@apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > > After looking at your recent release,
> > your
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> current
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>growth
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > and
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > well
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > functioning PPMC, was wondering what was
> > >> left
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> for you
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>guys
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> to
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> graduate?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > > John
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > --
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > Best regards,
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >    - Andy
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > If you are given a choice, you believe you
> have
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> acted freely. -
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Raymond
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> >>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to