> "Chris T. Daida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the "comprehensive" comparison. I didn't know the
> 1000FN was so respectable. A split-image focus screen? And a
> near-IR assist? Not bad at all...But your Elan 7e list was longer
> for obvious reason. I'd say the trade-off is pretty stacked in
> the Elan's favor...
> BTW, e-mailing you had reminded me--the EOS Doc project is now
> one year old! Happy birthday.
Hi Chris,
Canon's EOS Rebel/Kiss line offers very good value for money. Is it
true that there were more Rebels sold than all of Canon's other
SLR's combined.
But I suspect that my EOS 1000FN is more "respectable" because of
the custom modifications I made: split-image focus screen, BP-50
vertical grip with secondary release, and a socket for the RS60-E3.
You are a week or so too early for eosdoc celebrations. 2000April29th
is the right date. I'm surprised that it outlasted other ventures
such as Chris Houston's eosclub
eosdoc members deserve a pat on the back. Achievements so far:
107 members
1 website
5 document templates
19 completed manuals
visitor feedback capability (+real visitor comments too :-)
Cheers
Julian Loke
P.S. I still have to get used to that 4fps cut and paste function
on my e-mail program :-)
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
