On 01 Sep 2009, at 18:11, Flammarion wrote:

> On 1 Sep, 16:34, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
>> On 01 Sep 2009, at 16:53, Flammarion wrote:
>>> That's another version of Platonia and therefore still an  
>>> ontological
>>> commitment.
>> No, it is the same arithmetical truth, but from the first person
>> perspective.
> A bottomless stack that has no ontological existence is irrelevant.
> I can't be implemented by what doesn't exist.

By comp, mainly by Church thesis only, you (in the third person sense)  
are implemented in the mathematical UD. OK?

The rest, that is that the first person-you-with-qualia appears also  
there, in a highly distributed form, follows from MGA.


> Either it is warmed-over Platonia or it is nothing.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to