Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2009, at 15:51, Flammarion wrote:
>> He goes on to conclude that I am being generated by an immaterial
>> UD. That is not possible if there are no immaterial entities.
> You are in a third person way. If you are a program relatively to any
> "real world", you are 'executed' infinitely often by the material UD,
> and by the arithmetical UD too in the corresponding third person sense).
> And MGA makes the need of a material UD non sensical, for anything
> Then, what you call "primary matter" is explained by the appearances
> of some irreductible invariant in universal 'dreams'. The real
> question is "why is it so symmetrical", is information preserved, is
> the empirical world coherent with the comp physics, etc.
> Some people can argue that MGA is not needed. They believe that it is
> obvious that consciousness is not something material at all, and that
> it is a waste of time of both trying to attach consciousness to
> matter, or to argue with those who believes that is possible (with or
> without comp).
But I'll bet they still try to avoid being struck in the head.
> Do you see the different 'big' picture (as opposed to believe it
> follows from comp)?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at