On Sep 22, 4:46 pm, Flammarion <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no problem attaching consc to PM.
What do you mean by this? David > On 22 Sep, 16:29, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2009, at 15:51, Flammarion wrote: > > > > He goes on to conclude that I am being generated by an immaterial > > > UD. That is not possible if there are no immaterial entities. > > > You are in a third person way. > > That is still not possible if there are no immaterial entities. > > >If you are a program relatively to any > > "real world", you are 'executed' infinitely often by the material UD, > > and by the arithmetical UD too in the corresponding third person sense). > > Not if there is no immaterial (or as you call it, arithmetic) UD. > > > And MGA makes the need of a material UD non sensical, for anything > > epistemological. > > A material UD cannot be redundant unless there is an immaterial > one to take its place. > > > Some people can argue that MGA is not needed. They believe that it is > > obvious that consciousness is not something material at all, and that > > it is a waste of time of both trying to attach consciousness to > > matter, or to argue with those who believes that is possible (with or > > without comp). > > > Do you see the different 'big' picture (as opposed to believe it > > follows from comp)? > > There is no problem attaching consc to PM. There is a problem > attachign consc. to mathematical structures, whether phsycially > emodied > or not. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
