On 22 Sep, 19:08, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>
>
>
>
> > On 22 Sep, 17:52, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 22, 4:46 pm, Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > There is no problem attaching consc to PM.
>
> > > What do you mean by this?
>
> > since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing
> > to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would
> > be a property.
>
> That's kind of funny you denying any existence to "mathematical" existence
> and aknowledging at the same time the existence of a "propertyless" thing.
*A* propertyless thing is fine. But there is a contradiciton
in multiple proeprtiless things
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
