2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>:

> since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing
> to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would
> be a property.

In what might such attachment consist, in you view, beyond the mere
assertion of its possibility?  Since you rule out intrinsic
properties, I assume you're not thinking of Chalmers' proposal.

David
>
>
>
> On 22 Sep, 17:52, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 4:46 pm, Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > There is no problem attaching consc to PM.
>>
>> What do you mean by this?
>
> since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing
> to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would
> be a property.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to