2009/9/22 Flammarion <[email protected]>: > since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing > to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would > be a property.
In what might such attachment consist, in you view, beyond the mere assertion of its possibility? Since you rule out intrinsic properties, I assume you're not thinking of Chalmers' proposal. David > > > > On 22 Sep, 17:52, David Nyman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sep 22, 4:46 pm, Flammarion <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > There is no problem attaching consc to PM. >> >> What do you mean by this? > > since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing > to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would > be a property. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
