Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology

[Flammarion]

On 22 Sep, 19:56, David Nyman <david.ny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Flammarion <peterdjo...@yahoo.com>:
>
> > since PM notoriously has no intrinisc properties, there is nothing
> > to stop qualia being attached to it. If there were, that would
> > be a property.
>
> In what might such attachment consist, in you view, beyond the mere
> assertion of its possibility?

What does the attachment of a material property like charge or
mass consist of? Such "attachment" is usually
considered a metaphysical primitive.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---