On 04/01/2011, at 9:11 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > 3-OM are discrete (assuming mechanism) > 1-OM does not need to be. The measure bears on the 1-OM, and is related to > the measure on all infinite computational histories (including oracles), and > this is a set of cardinality 2^aleph_0, and the topology is unknown, but it > is more plausible that the set of 1-OM is a non discrete structure, like most > possible notion of subjective and physical time.
So the experience of the continuous, the analog experience of time is subjective - an 'interpretation' that my mind supplies(?). In fact, "I" don't experience 'observer moments' at all. I experience a 'river of time' or a paved walkway with a continuous border over which I seem to glide. The 3rd person version is where I get to watch 'you' do various discrete things (moving your limbs) that I will perhaps agree lead to a similar experience of continuity for you. Actually, I only notice 'you' when you tread on each paver. You disappear as you move between them. This is because when I 'notice you' - the duration of my noticing you (my focussed, conscious attention) forms the duration of the 3-OM. 1-OM = analog experience of time 3-OM = digital experience of time Ca va un peu? Tu me dira... Kim Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
