On Aug 1, 2:55 pm, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:

> That happens with comp too, if you grasp the seventh UDA step. Our  
> first person experience are distributed in a non computable way in the  
> universal dovetailing.
> You have a good intuition, but you assume much to much. The goal is to  
> explain the sense and matter without assuming sense nor matter (but  
> accepting the usual phenomenology of it, which is what we need to  
> search an explanation for).

Searching for an explanation is phenomenological too though, as are
numbers. Arithmetic is part of sense. A sensorimotive circuit, to
detect, model, and control. It's an experience which requires a very
specific intelligence to participate in. We can control and detect by
arithmetic modeling, but that doesn't mean the object of it's modeling
is arithmetic. I think that I'm actually assuming much less - my
primitive universe doesn't require any epiphenomena or
disqualification of appearances.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to