On Aug 1, 2:55 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > That happens with comp too, if you grasp the seventh UDA step. Our > first person experience are distributed in a non computable way in the > universal dovetailing. > > You have a good intuition, but you assume much to much. The goal is to > explain the sense and matter without assuming sense nor matter (but > accepting the usual phenomenology of it, which is what we need to > search an explanation for).
Searching for an explanation is phenomenological too though, as are numbers. Arithmetic is part of sense. A sensorimotive circuit, to detect, model, and control. It's an experience which requires a very specific intelligence to participate in. We can control and detect by arithmetic modeling, but that doesn't mean the object of it's modeling is arithmetic. I think that I'm actually assuming much less - my primitive universe doesn't require any epiphenomena or disqualification of appearances. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
