On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> Hi Terren,
>     "Comp is false" is too strong. He is explaining how comp is
> "incomplete". The movie graph argument is flawed.

I'm not sure what that means, that comp is incomplete. You either
start from the assumption that your consciousness can be faithfully
preserved (or duplicated) by a brain transplant, or you don't. What am
I missing?

I admit I haven't followed all of the list postings lately, but I
haven't seen a coherent explanation of why the movie graph argument is
flawed... if I missed it, can you point me to where this was


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to