On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:51:50 AM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
> Roger, 
> To say that a connection is based on logic is a category error. 
> More specifically, 
> I conjecture that the connection in the brain between the physical brain 
> and the (computational?) mind/monads is based on BEC entanglement. 
> BEC stands for Bose-Einstein Condensate. 
> It has been demonstrated experimentally that BECs made of different 
> substances 
> can become entangled. I claim based on string theory that the monads 
> are a BEC since they came from space. They are compactified space, 
> crystalline in form and essentially motionless. Presumably there is 
> also a physical BEC in the brain. 
> So if my conjecture is correct, that disparate BECs, even the monad 
> BEC is substantive, 
> are capable of entanglement, which of course is all logical, then the 
> connection is based on entanglement. To say that a connection is based 
> on logic is a category error. 
> Richard 
What advantage does a BEC explanation really have over substance dualism 
though? How dies it solve the hard problem? Why do BECs experience things 
and nothing else does?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to