On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Darwin does not need to be wrong. Consciousness role can be deeper, in > the "evolution/selection" of the laws of physics from the coherent dreams > (computations from the 1p view) in arithmetic. > I have no idea what that means, not a clue, but I do know that Evolution can't select for something it can't see, and I do know that Evolution can see intelligence because it produces behavior. Evolution can't see consciousness directly any better than we can, so if it produced it (and it did unless Darwin was dead wrong) then consciousness MUST be a byproduct of something that it can see. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
