On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2012, at 19:29, John Clark wrote:
> Well I don't know about you but I don't think my consciousness was there
> before Evolution figured out how to make brains, I believe this because I
> can't seem to remember events that were going on during the Precambrian.
> I've always been a little hazy about what exactly "comp" meant but I had
> the general feeling that I sorta agreed with it, but apparently not.
> You keep defending comp, in your dialog with Craig, but you don't follow
> its logical consequences,
> I guess, this is by not wanting to take seriously the first person and
> third person distinction, which is the key of the UD argument.
> You can attach consciousness to the owner of a brain, but the owner itself
> must attach his consciousness to all states existing in arithmetic (or in a
> physical universe if that exists) and realizing that brain state.
I would also suggest that you read this link, it shows how an infinitely
large cosmos leads directly to quantum mechanics due to the observer's
inability to self-locate. For someone who believes in both mechanism and
platonism, it is the exact scenario platonic programs should find
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at