On 24 Jan 2013, at 22:03, Jason Resch wrote:

John,

I agree with Craig. The concept of divine simplicity exists in several religions ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_simplicity ).


The book by O'Meara on Plotinus makes clear the idea that Plotinus want the ONE to be simple. The ONE is seen as the simplest thing from which the MANY can emanate, and the SOUL contemplate (or fall).




The concept is also not dissimilar to the "Neti Neti" (Not this, not that) explanation of Brahman in Hindusim ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neti_neti ) or the Nirguna Brahman, which is Brahman without qualities.

Nice. That's also a common point with neoplatonist theologies. It is negation theologies, where the big thing is only refuted to be this or that. With comp this applies to both "truth" and "the inner god", that is you-at-the-first-person (you-1 have no definite name or description), you-yourself are not this or that.




Of course, the whole question of what is simple and what is complex requires a definition of complexity. The universal dovetailer is a simple program, yet it generates all programs. The Mandlebrot set has a simple definition, but is infinitely detailed. Pi has a simple definition, but an infinite expansion of digits.

So apparent complexity, of a universe, a world, etc. need not be dependent on complex underlying principles or systems. Bruno often says, arithmetic is much bigger when seen from the inside.

Little numbers can develop crazy complex behaviors, and with comp they can support (locally) rich inner experiences. The difficulty relies in the first person statistical fitness with the probable universal neighbors. (As you can guess).

Bruno



Jason




On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:54 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013  Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> A two year old can understand what God is supposed to be.

A two year old can't understand how something simple can know everything and neither can I; and there is a reason the word "simple" is often used as a synonym for "stupid". And the Bible just says that God made animals but it doesn't say how, but Darwin didn't just say Evolution made animals he explained how it did it. Saying "animals exist because of God" is no more helpful than saying "animals exist because of flobkneegrab".

> The position that I am arguing is knock down that unsupported balloon that you tried to float about science being better than religion because science always means that complex things are explained by simple things.

That is not what science means that is what a explanation means; a theory (like the God theory) that explains the existence of something unlikely (like us) by postulating the existence of something even more unlikely (like God) is worse than useless.


> Your straw man of me arguing that God is not important didn't work.

Good, now I don't have to find a verse in the Bible proving that it teaches that God is grand.


> This is something that science and religion have in common, not which sets them apart.

But you aren't exactly a expert on science, you admitted that to you most scientific papers are just a huge amount of mumbo jumbo, so your readers might be wise to take your views on the value of science with a grain of salt.

  John K Clark



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en .

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to