Dear Bruno and Stephen,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]>wrote: > On 1/27/2013 7:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> The big bang remains awkward with computationalism. It suggest a long and >> deep computations is going through our state, but comp suggest that the big >> bang is not the beginning. >> > > Dear Bruno, > > I think that comp plus some finite limit on resources = Big Bang per > observer. > Couldn't the Big Bang just be the simplest possible state? That doesn't mean it's the beginning, just that it's a likely predecessor to any other state. The more complex a state is, the smaller the number of states that it is likely to be a predecessor of. > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to > everything-list@googlegroups.**com<[email protected]> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe@ > **googlegroups.com <everything-list%[email protected]>. > > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/**group/everything-list?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en> > . > For more options, visit > https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
