On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]>wrote:
>> After several statements of this sort I don't see how anybody who values >> rationality can take anything that Craig Weinberg says seriously. >> > > > What about Schrödinger? > Schrödinger didn't say "There is nothing in numerology or astrology which is even remotely as flaky as modern cosmology" nor did he say "I couldn't have any more interest in astrology if I tried. I have been analyzing charts since 1988. Astrology and numerology are by far the most interesting and useful subjects that I have ever encountered in my life" and he also didn't say "Most scientific papers I have looked at contain a huge amount of mumbo jumbo." John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
