On Thu, May 9, 2013 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com> wrote:
> Roulette wheels are not random, they can be modeled as Newtonian
> mechanisms, exactly like cuckoo clocks.
No they are not exactly alike. A tiny change in a cuckoo clock causes a
tiny change in the clock's performance, but a tiny change in the roulette
wheel causes a HUGE change in the wheel's performance, and conceivably the
change might be so small that we're talking about a quantum event. And if
you don't like roulette then a electronic circuit that detects shot noise
or a Geiger counter.
> > You can accept that true randomness is fundamental, and thus, not
I can accept that it is conceivable. I do not think that nature is
obligated to arrange things in such a way that human beings can always
> but the MWI and Bruno's FPI provide a compelling contrary hypothesis.
I like the MWI because it doesn't have to explain what a observer or a
observation is not because it gets rid of randomness. Personally I don't
see much difference between saying something happened for no cause and
saying something happened for a cause that can't ever be detected even in
theory. And to tell you the truth I can't keep up with Bruno's homemade
acronyms and terms and have quite forgotten what "FPI" even stands for.
And speaking of profound mysteries, why isn't acronym a acronym? Hey wait a
minute it is! Arranged Chronological Reassignment Of Names You Manipulate;
acronym for short.
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.