On 3 October 2013 12:38, chris peck <chris_peck...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bruno
> *[JC] Because step 3 sucks.
> * *
> * *
> * ** *
> * *
> *[Bruno] Why? You have not yet make a convincing point on this. *
> His point is convincing me.
> Which point is that? JC said:
What question about personal identity is indeterminate? There is a 100%
> chance that the Helsinki man will turn into the Moscow man because the
> Helsinki Man saw Moscow, and a 100% chance the Helsinki Man will turn into
> the Washington Man because the Helsinki Man saw Washington, and a 100%
> chance that the first person view of the Helsinki Man will be a view ONLY
> of Helsinki because otherwise the first person view of the Helsinki Man
> would not be the first person view of the Helsinki man.
This is uncontraversially, one might say trivially correct, but it doesn't
refute anything about the first person indeterminacy, which occurs in
quantum measurements as well as hypothetical teleporters. Is there
something wrong with quantum indeterminacy?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.