On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 Stephen Paul King <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I disagree, I think it is very clear. If things need to be that precise,
>> if a change in a quantum state destroys our identity then we die about
>> 10^44 times a second; and a consciousness that never changes is not a
>> consciousness.
>>
>
> > Do you see consciousness as a thing or as a process?
>

A process.

>> The real question is about our minds, and despite what some like Roger
>> Penrose say I think our minds are probably entirely classical.
>>
>
> > Why? If minds are classical then they are easy to copy, in principle.
> Why then are there not lots of John Clarks running around?
>

Because the difference between in principle and in practice can be huge.
There is no scientific or philosophical reason there are not lots of John
Clarks running around , it's purely technological; in less than a hundred
years, probably less than 50, things will be very different .

 John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to