On 23 January 2014 12:25, Stephen Paul King <[email protected]>wrote:
> > And the logical process, at least, re-presents the physical process. We > get a closed loop if we have full algebraic closure and a bijection between > the two sides of the proverbial coin. > > I don't know what this means. The obvious inference from the term "closed loop" is that there is some sort of feed-forward from the abstract entity that is, say, the number 2 to the physical representation of it. So the abstract entity somehow created the physical representation. And then feed back to the abstract from the physical... (Isn't that a bit like saying that me typing "I just saw a cat" created the cat?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
