On Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:52:56 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 05 Mar 2014, at 18:45, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
>
> Brent was right but the explanation could use some examples to show you 
> what's happening.  The strangeness that you noticed occurs because you're 
> looking at cases where the proportion is *exactly* 50%.  
>
> binopdf(2,4,0.5)=0.375
> binopdf(3,6,0.5)=0.3125
> binopdf(4,8,0.5)=0.2374
> binopdf(8,16,0.5)=0.1964
> binopdf(1000,2000,0.5)=0.0178
> binopdf(1e6,2e6,0.5)=0.0006
>
> Instead let's look at cases which are in some range close to 50%.
>
> binocdf(5,8,0.5)-binocdf(3,8,0.5)=0.4922
> binocdf(10,16,0.5)-binocdf(6,16,0.5)=0.6677
> binocdf(520,1000,0.5)-binocdf(480,1000,0.5)=0.7939
> binocdf(1001000,2e6,0.5)-binocdf(999000,2e6,0.5)=0.8427
> binocdf(1000050000,2e9,0.5)-binocdf(999950000,2e9,0.5)=0.9747
>
> Basically, as you flip a coin more and more times, you get a growing 
> number of distinct proportions of heads and tails that can come up, so any 
> exact proportion becomes less likely.  But at the same time, as you flip 
> the coin more and more times, the distribution of proportions starts to 
> cluster more and more tightly around the expected value.  So for tests when 
> you do two million flips of a fair coin, only about 0.06% of the tests come 
> up exactly 50% heads and 50% tails, but 84.27% of the tests come up between 
> 49.95% and 50.05%.
>
>
>
> Good. So you agree with step 3? What about step 4? (*). I am interested to 
> know.
>
> the FPI is just the elementary statistics of the "bernouilly épreuve" (in 
> french statistics), and that is pretty obvious when you grasp the 
> definitions given of 1p and 3p.
>
> Bruno
>
> (*) 
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHALAbstract.html
>
>
Did you mean to address me, or did you mean to address Chris? 

I don't object to any step in UDA.  It seems internally consistent and 
plausible to me.  I'm unsure what level of confidence I would assign to it 
being actually true, although my gut feeling is in the vicinity of 25%.  I 
have much formal logic to learn before I have any meaningful opinion about 
AUDA.

-Gabe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to