2015-01-10 23:12 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-10 22:10 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>> But trade need an environment where some force and some love are
>>>> necessary. Trade without enforcement of contracts does not work.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There's plenty of evidence to the contrary.
>>>
>>
>> I would like to know. I have a long experience in discussions with anarco
>> capitalists, since I was one of them for a time
>>
>>>
>>> Take Silk Road. By it's very nature it could not resort to any of the
>>> law enforcement or judicial systems maintained by the state. It didn't even
>>> use the state's currency. Yet it had a large number of happy buyers and
>>> sellers. It worked perfectly well under self-regulation.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Neither work without some sincere love for what one does and for the
>>>> well being of the client.  trade without force need an utopic quantity of
>>>> love.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It might only need rational agents: one's reputation is more valuable in
>>> the long run than immediate profit, one should due one's due diligence
>>> before entering large trades. Again, this is how any successful illegal
>>> market operates. And many do.
>>>
>>> A rational agent is a gangster, or a swindler. No intention to be
>> sarcastic here. Both are perfect rational agents, and both will be present
>> in any market environment ready to destroy the win-win game of the market.
>> That is the reason why force and love are necessary.
>>
>
> If there are enough rational agents in the market, cooperation becomes
> more profitable than misbehaviour. Rational agents will be careful about
> who they enter large transaction with. So the access to high transactions
> becomes dependent on reputation, and reputation becomes more valuable than
> the profits from misbehaving on smaller trades.
>
> This is why Silk Road worked, even though people could send flour instead
> of cocaine, and the buyer would have no recourse to the police or the
> courts.
>

Did you mean violence did not exists ? the recourse was simple... killing,
coercion... if that is an example of "free" market... then I'll prefer not
to be part of it.

Anarcho-capitalism is a non-sense and an hijacking of the meaning of
anarchism... anarchism cannot be capitalistic... that's a non-sequitur.

Quentin


>
>
>>
>> It is so evident for me that I would be very very surprised to find that
>> you convince me after years of arguing with anarco-capitalists
>>
>>
>>> Telmo.
>>>
>>>
>>>> trade without love need big quantity of force.
>>>>
>>>> It is a pity to see all these  modern ideologies that are nothing but
>>>> simplifications and adaptations of Christian concepts.  No political system
>>>> is better than other. The Christian call for a personal revolution, called
>>>> conversion, to change what is around and have a better society, not a
>>>> political change.  Paul called for the obedience of the Cesar, and the
>>>> Cesar at that time was Nero. Only by the example or testimony of each one
>>>> that changes the people around, the system will mutate to a better one.
>>>> Even if formally does not change. And the contrary the better political
>>>> system will decay if the people do evil. No society will be free from
>>>> corruption since it is in human nature.
>>>>
>>>> In contrast the liberal sectarians of the ilustration and the french
>>>> revolution though that a political change would change fundamentally the
>>>> society for a better one without previously changing the people. That does
>>>> not work.
>>>>
>>>> After that, the socialist sectarians fo the comunist revolution though
>>>> that a violent social change would create a new Man. That didn't work too.
>>>>
>>>> What is next? the sectarian culturalist though....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All of them are bad and cheap copies of the Christian conception of
>>>> salvation, escatology etc.
>>>>
>>>> But it is better to call things by his name. Democracy is an
>>>> ideological lie. There is no such thing as democracy. There is the law of
>>>> majority. and the result is not what the majority think, but what the elite
>>>> -that they admire and obey- think. At the end the formal system does not
>>>> matter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-10 19:40 GMT+01:00 John Clark <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:08 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything
>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Functioning anarchy would require a level of individual ethics that
>>>>>> does not yet exist
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it's socialism that won't work unless everybody is a saint, and
>>>>> that's why socialist are always observed to be in a constant state of
>>>>> righteous indignation; people aren't behaving as he wants then to behave
>>>>> and as they must behave for his system to function. In general I can only
>>>>> think of 3 ways to get anybody to do anything, force, love, or trade. I
>>>>> think most of us would agree that all else being equal force is the least
>>>>> desirable of the three. Love is very nice and it works for some things but
>>>>> any economic system that must rely on people loving each other is just not
>>>>> going to work. So unless somebody knows of a fourth way that I haven't
>>>>> thought of there is only one thing left.
>>>>>
>>>>> The farmer grows my food, the trucker moves my food and the grocer
>>>>> sells my food, I didn't make them do it and none of these people love me,
>>>>> yet the free market plunges them into a conspiracy to put food on my
>>>>> table. Capitalism can efficiently create wealth even if everybody is just
>>>>> looking out for themselves, I know of no other economic system that can do
>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>>   John K Clark
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alberto.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alberto.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to