On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> chris peck wrote: >> There is no contradiction here as Clark has pointed out with excruciating >> and what must amount to inhuman patience over many many years. Neither >> duplicate would conclude that P(W & M) was 0 for their mutual ancestor and >> the fact they only see one city wouldn't be considered by either of them to >> be evidence that he was wrong. > > > > > Only by dismissing the question asked, and confusing the third person > description of the first person experience and their explicit content. > I said it before I'll say it again, when talking about the future in a world with people duplicating machines there is no such thing as "*THE*" first person experience , there is only "*A*" first person experience; and specifying that the one who deserves the grand title "*THE*" is the one "*HE*" experiences does not make things one bit less ambiguous. Not that the future, or the lack of one, has anything to do with present consciousness or the feeling of a unique self. > > you seem to painfully imitate John Clark's persistent confusion > Bruno, have you ever considered the possibility that maybe just maybe you are the one who is confused? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
