On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > T > he probability of he (or anyone, actually) **experiencing** one and only > one city is *one*. >
If you want that statement to be true then "he" can't mean somebody who remembers being a man in Helsinki, you're going to have to change what "he" means to something else. But of course ICT1PWT3P, > > Proof: let do the experience and ask after the duplication has been > completed to all the guys---who remembers being the guy who was in Helsinki > before the duplication---how many cities they have seen behind the door. > OK, "he" will say one city, Moscow. And "he" will say one city, Washington. So if 1+1 =2, and I really think it is, then "he" saw 2 cities. If you want that statement to be false then "he" can't mean somebody who remembers being a man in Helsinki, you're going to have to change what "he" means to something else. But of course ICT1PWT3P, > > > From a first person view, a duplication does not duplicate, > If that first person wants to discuss what will happen to "him" after the people duplicator has been turned on that discussion will be gibberish unless it is realized that the first person view has been duplicated. But of course ICT1PWT3P, > The only way to confirm the expectations is in interviewing the copies, about their experience I agree but one interview is not sufficient to confirm or refute the expectation, two are required. Not that expectations, correct ones or incorrect ones, have anything to do with consciousness or the unique feeling of self. But of course ICT1PWT3P, John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
