On 1/20/2020 5:10 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
I explained it several times. There's a singularity implied it it had a start AND was infinite. If it's infinite, it never had a beginning or start. AG
Why isn't a singularity implied if it had a start and was /finite/? That was exactly the standard argument for a supernatural beginning...something (finite) from nothing was a violation of nature and reason. You seem to be stuck in Aristotelian philosophy. Physicist tend to use mathematics to cover a domain up to the point it produces an infinity or infinitesimal and then just look at that as the end of applicability...not a point to start drawing inferences from what "infinity" implies.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5E2614EF.8020604%40verizon.net.
