On 1/20/2020 5:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 6:22:28 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



    On 1/20/2020 4:51 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 5:27:35 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:



        On 1/20/2020 3:29 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
        > IF it has a beginning, it didn't exist prior to that
        beginning, so it
        > couldn't ever be infinite thereafter because the expansion
        occurs at a
        > finite rate

        There's an implicit assumption that it could not have come into
        existence as infinite...but it could have come into existence as
        finite.  Why is the latter OK but not the former?

        Brent


    If it was finite or infinite at T = 0, it "began" before T = 0. AG

    Now you're obfuscating.  Nobody said anything about T=0 which you
    now throw out with no definition.


Call it what you like. It's a symbol for the start or beginning. AG

One might think so, but then you explicitly say it began before T=0...whatever that means.

    The question is why do think something finite can come into
    existence but something infinite can't.


It if were finite or infinite "at the beginning", it existed before then, as finite or infinite.

Why? You're just making up axioms out your intuition...just like an Aristotelian.

I am assuming that it didn't exist before it began! You want to have your cake and eat it. AG

    You're just prejudiced against infinite things?


No. I just don't believe finite processes in finite times can have infinite results.

OK. But why can't something exist without a process. You seem fine with assuming finite things exist without growing from zero by some process.

Brent

This is really so simple. Why can't you see it? Voting for Trump?. AG

|But if that's the answer, why allow for anything infinite, either in time or rate or extent?

|You seem to want to argue that only a closed, positively curved universe is possible.

No. If our universe didn't have a beginning, it wouldn't necessarily be closed and positively curved. AG

|If you simply reject the possibility of infinite extent then you can conclude that...

I don't .What I'm rejecting is a universe with a beginning AND infinite in spatial extent. AG

|not need to argue about beginnings or rate of expansion or anything else.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0b3ed03d-dd0e-4d12-a28c-ed153c8b385a%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0b3ed03d-dd0e-4d12-a28c-ed153c8b385a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5E265941.1000406%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to