On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 5:27:35 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: > > > > On 1/20/2020 3:29 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > IF it has a beginning, it didn't exist prior to that beginning, so it > > couldn't ever be infinite thereafter because the expansion occurs at a > > finite rate > > There's an implicit assumption that it could not have come into > existence as infinite...but it could have come into existence as > finite. Why is the latter OK but not the former? > > Brent >
If it was finite or infinite at T = 0, it "began" before T = 0. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dc4932e3-0f29-45f4-80e6-a155bcac3abd%40googlegroups.com.
