Not when I was there 85-87
________________________________ From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Share, Judy and Robin, was J gets another fact wrong and S apologizes to R RICHARD! I think I'm doing pretty dang good with the boundary setting but YMMV. Go figure and LOL too! Actually I think MIU did have some certificate programs for cooking and woodworking and ayurveda teching and such. PS I admit that after my posts to Doc this morning I'm worried that Robin will henceforth be known in cyberspace as he who psychologically raped a Seriously Excitable Vegetable. ________________________________ From: Richard J. Williams <rich...@rwilliams.us> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:21 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Share, Judy and Robin, was J gets another fact wrong and S apologizes to R Share Long: > Richard, is this there one of them there red > herrings or Aunt Sallys or straw individuals? > No, just free advice so you don't get your mind raped. LoL! > And hopefully by now MJ realizes that you love > to taunt him about allegedly being an MIU student. > Never heard of a college student that didn't take English or History. There's no 'MJ' Share, it's just another anonymous informant, poioning the well. Nobody I know ever heard of him up there, baking or otherwise. So, we haven't heard the full story, obviously. After reading TM discussion groups for fifteen years, I can say without the least hesitation, there's always an untold story. Take the example of Lon P. Stacks or Steve Perino. Why anyone would want to be a 'baker' up at MIU and not pursue a degree in cookin is beyond me. Curtis got a degree in Philosophy up there and Kirk Bernhardt got a degree in English from MIU, so I know it can be done. So, what's the point? Alex don't need no stinkin' MUM degree because he's already living in Heaven on Earth out there. Go figure. > > Ok, Judy, apologies accepted, thank you. > > > When someone says they believe they can tell > you what to think, you have the right to tell > them you believe you have the right to tell > them where to go. LoL! > > > Moving on, you think I was wrong when I said > > psychologically raped to Robin. I think I > > was emotionally upset, as well as overwhelmed > > by many other inputs. I think I was lacking > > in psychological development. I think I was > > lacking in certain communication skills. > > > > Nonetheless I think my POV is more accurate and > > inclusive of the whole truth than yours. And my > > inner Xeno is smiling wryly about that. > > > > My statements on and about Sept 6 were all > > genuine expressions of how I was feeling when I > > wrote them. Even now I assess those posts as > > accurately reporting that I was very upset with > > Robin and also giving him the benefit of the > > doubt because I wanted to see if there was a > > way to continue being friends. It is true that > > I was experiencing a mix and range of physical > > and emotional states from grumpiness to feeling > > psychologically raped. > > > > Mix and range of inner experiences is something > > humans experience. Though evidently not all > > humans recognize this fact. > > > > In addition, every time Xeno, Curtis, Steve, > > feste and others write about this, their clarity > > and greater objectivity has helped me understand > > what was often subjective and emotionally > > challenging for me. So I am grateful to them all > > for helping me find the words to understand events > > and individuals that I'm still trying to understand. > > And I continue to incorporate their understandings > > and wordings into my thinking and writing about it. > > EMILY, take note, my incorporating of the insights > > of others will continue to happen. > > > > Judy, it's not that I keep going lower and lower. > > It's that your assessment of your POV keeps going > > higher and higher. Indicating only that it's all > > relative. > > > > As for your concern about Robin's reputation, as > > one poster recently said here, what I said was a blip > > on the screen in comparison to Robin's own posts. > > I'd add that the postings of many of his supporters > > also affects his reputation negatively, as difficult > > as that might be for them to acknowledge. > > > > Reasonable people everywhere will consider all that > > is pertinent. Or maybe ignore the whole thing. > > Beyond that it is the workings of karma. > > > > > > > > Poor archives, still being selectively eschewed by Judy. > > > Correcting Judy: I joined FFL in May 2012 and Robin > > > rejoined in June 2012. > > > > > You are absolutely right, my mistake, and my apologies. > > > > Robin *first* joined FFL in June 2011, left in January > > 2012, and returned in June. You joined in May 2012, > > as you say. Apparently I conflated the two June dates. > > I should have double-checked. > > > > However, my point stands: You were not new either to FFL > > or to Robin at the time he made the remarks that you > > decided four weeks later constituted "psychological rape." > > You had been on FFL for three-and-a-half months, and your > > conversations with Robin had begun in early July, two > > months previously. > > >