what robert describes or what i describe?
* alex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> you don't think having a single body with london.pm representation whose
> responsibilities would be exam delivery, assessment and certificaiton
> would be more efficient/effective than what you describe?
>
> alex
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
> > > I think a lot of this will be about signing up to a charter or code
> > > of conduct. What we will need is an actual exam, i was thinking about
> > > this last night, and my thoughts were to write a web interface were
> > > certified certifiers could request 10 tests, by filling the names
> > > of the recipients in first. Then a script would select questions
> > > from a database of categorised questions and make up a PDF seperately
> > > for each of the recipients, the certifier would then supervise
> > > the recipient completing the test in the allotted time and afterwards
> > > they would mark it and return it (original hardcopy) to the main body.
> > > This main body may check one or two, more to ensure that their
> > > is consistency across certifiers, and assuming that the tests
> > > were all fine, the certifier would get a nice shiny PDF for each
> > > of the recipients of the test.
> > >
> >
> > As TIMTOWTDI in Perl, marking could be extremely difficult unless we have
> > multiple choice questions. Is MSCS multiple choice? SAP is.
> >
> > /Robert
> >
> >
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________
> alex nunes | t 020 7603 5723 | f 020 7603 2504
> director | read the NEW story @ http://codix.net/
> codix.net | 107 shepherd's bush road, london w6 7lp
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
